NCT06553651

Brief Summary

Pancreatic necrosis is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis involves the irreversible death of pancreatic tissue, which can lead to severe health issues, including infections and an increased risk of death. An endoscopic procedure called direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is typically performed to remove this necrotic pancreatic tissue as a minimally invasive treatment. This procedure is performed using a thin, flexible, lighted tube called an endoscope and endoscopic instruments that are used with working channels through the scope. Current methods for removing necrotic tissue involve using endoscopic devices such as snares, baskets, nets, and forceps. However, these standard methods are often not very effective because the necrotic tissue can be sticky and hard to grasp. This DEN procedure is part of regular clinical care to treat this condition and remove necrotic tissue from the pancreas. For this research study, the same DEN procedure will be followed with the exception of the device used for the removal of the necrotic tissue. Instead of using forceps, snares, or other traditional tools, a cryoprobe will be used. Cryoprobes work by using extremely cold temperatures to freeze and adhere to the necrotic tissue, making it easier to remove. This method might be better because it can secure larger tissue samples and potentially reduce complications associated with traditional methods. Cryotechnology is successfully used in endoscopy to remove necrotic tissue, foreign bodies and more, but has not been extensively tested in pancreatic necrosis. Cryoprobes are FDA approved medical devices with an established safety record. They are used successfully in very sensitive areas such as the lungs. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryotechnology for DEN.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Apr 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress6%
Apr 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2024

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 2, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 26, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy (DEN)Endoscopic NecrosectomyPancreatic NecrosectomyNecrosectomyCryotherapyCryotechnology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Technical Success Rate

    To evaluate the effectiveness of cryotechnology for the removal of necrotic pancreatic tissue. Achievement of at least 70% removal of necrotic debris from the pancreatic collection being treated, as determined by change in computed tomography (CT) evaluation from baseline to 21 days post-treatment.

    Baseline, Follow-up Visit Day 21

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Safety and Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Procedure Day 0, Follow-up Visit Day 21

  • Mean Total Procedure Time

    Procedure Day 0, Reintervention (if needed)

  • Total Number of Reinterventions

    From Procedure Day 0 through Follow-up Visit Day 21

  • Clinical Improvement within 72 Hours

    Baseline, Procedure Day 0, up to 3 days post-procedure

  • Duration of Hospital Stay

    From Procedure Day 0 through date of discharge

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Cryotechnology Necrosectomy Procedure

EXPERIMENTAL

Enrolled subjects will undergo direct endoscopic necrosectomy using 1.7 mm single use, flexible cryoprobes, aimed at effectively removing necrotic tissue within the pancreatic cavity.

Device: Cryotechnology Necrosectomy Procedure

Interventions

Subjects undergo necrosectomy with 1.7 mm flexible cryoprobes, either concurrently with stent placement or post-placement, at the Investigator's discretion. The cryoprobe will freeze the necrotic tissue and extracted en-bloc. A maximum of 4 cryotechnology procedures will be performed, with each procedure aiming for significant debris removal and clinical improvement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) symptoms.

Also known as: Cryotherapy
Cryotechnology Necrosectomy Procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects aged 18 years and above, inclusive of both males and females.
  • Patients with symptomatic pancreatic necrosis resulting from acute pancreatitis, indicated for endoscopic necrosectomy following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage.
  • Imaging indicative of ≥30% necrotic material within the pancreas.
  • Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) size ≥6 cm.
  • Subjects able to tolerate repeated endoscopic procedures.
  • Capacity for providing informed consent.
  • Understanding of study requirements, provision of written informed consent, and willingness and ability to attend required follow-up assessments through 21 (+/- 7) days.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Unwillingness to undergo repeated endoscopies.
  • Presence of documented Pseudoaneurysm \> 1cm within the WOPN.
  • Intervening gastric varices or unavoidable blood vessels within the access tract.
  • Use of dual antiplatelet therapy or therapeutic anticoagulation that cannot be temporarily discontinued.
  • Any condition deemed by the investigator to compromise the safety of undergoing an endoscopic procedure.
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or absence of reliable contraception in women of childbearing potential.
  • Current enrollment in another investigational trial with potential to interfere with this study's endpoint analyses.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (29)

  • Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J, Badaoui A, Bali MA, Barthet M, Besselink M, Deviere J, Oliveira Ferreira A, Gyokeres T, Hritz I, Hucl T, Milashka M, Papanikolaou IS, Poley JW, Seewald S, Vanbiervliet G, van Lienden K, van Santvoort H, Voermans R, Delhaye M, van Hooft J. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):524-546. doi: 10.1055/a-0588-5365. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

    PMID: 29631305BACKGROUND
  • Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068.

    PMID: 23622135BACKGROUND
  • Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC, Mallery S, Freeman M, Besselink MG. Current Concepts in Severe Acute and Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Approach. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(7):1994-2007.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

    PMID: 30776347BACKGROUND
  • Pinto S, Bellizzi S, Badas R, Canfora ML, Loddo E, Spada S, Khalaf K, Fugazza A, Bergamini S. Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy: Timing and Technique. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 28;57(12):1305. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121305.

    PMID: 34946249BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Lakhtakia S, Thakkar S, Buxbaum JL, Waxman I, Sutton B, Memon SF, Singh S, Basha J, Singh A, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S; United States Pancreatic Disease Study Group. Upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or step-up endoscopic approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis (DESTIN): a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;9(1):22-33. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00331-X. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

    PMID: 37980922BACKGROUND
  • van Brunschot S, Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Baron TH, Beger HG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bruno MJ, Carter R, French JJ, Coelho D, Dahl B, Dijkgraaf MG, Doctor N, Fagenholz PJ, Farkas G, Castillo CFD, Fockens P, Freeman ML, Gardner TB, Goor HV, Gooszen HG, Hannink G, Lochan R, McKay CJ, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Parks RW, Peev MP, Raraty M, Rau B, Rosch T, Rovers M, Seifert H, Siriwardena AK, Horvath KD, van Santvoort HC. Minimally invasive and endoscopic versus open necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis: a pooled analysis of individual data for 1980 patients. Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):697-706. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313341. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

    PMID: 28774886BACKGROUND
  • Mohamadnejad M, Anushiravani A, Kasaeian A, Sorouri M, Djalalinia S, Kazemzadeh Houjaghan A, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic or surgical treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E420-E428. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-9229. eCollection 2022 Apr.

    PMID: 35433210BACKGROUND
  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee; Saumoy M, Trindade AJ, Bhatt A, Bucobo JC, Chandrasekhara V, Copland AP, Han S, Kahn A, Krishnan K, Kumta NA, Law R, Obando JV, Parsi MA, Trikudanathan G, Yang J, Lichtenstein DR; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee Chair. Summary: endoscopic therapies for walled-off necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jun;97(6):1001-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Apr 26. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37115165BACKGROUND
  • van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Lameris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen MS, Buskens E, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.

    PMID: 20410514BACKGROUND
  • Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Buskens E, Dejong CH, van Eijck CH, van Goor H, Hofker SS, Lameris JS, van Leeuwen MS, Ploeg RJ, van Ramshorst B, Schaapherder AF, Cuesta MA, Consten EC, Gouma DJ, van der Harst E, Hesselink EJ, Houdijk LP, Karsten TM, van Laarhoven CJ, Pierie JP, Rosman C, Bilgen EJ, Timmer R, van der Tweel I, de Wit RJ, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Minimally invasive 'step-up approach' versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg. 2006 Apr 11;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-6-6.

    PMID: 16606471BACKGROUND
  • Yachimski P, Landewee CA, Campisano F, Valdastri P, Obstein KL. The waterjet necrosectomy device for endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis: design, development, and preclinical testing (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):770-775. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

    PMID: 32334018BACKGROUND
  • Yan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, Shariaha RZ, Binmoeller KF, Adler DG, DeSimone M, Berzin T, Swahney M, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Diehl DL, Wang L, Ghulab A, Butt N, Siddiqui AA. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):172-179. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_108_17.

    PMID: 29882517BACKGROUND
  • Giri M, Huang G, Puri A, Zhuang R, Li Y, Guo S. Efficacy and Safety of Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Lung Tumors, and Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;9:840702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.840702. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35372452BACKGROUND
  • Wirsing L, Linzenbold W, Jaeger SU, Stahl P, Ott G, Leibold T, Enderle M, Albert J, Peveling-Oberhag J. A new tool for bile duct tissue sampling: ex vivo clinical evaluation of intraductal cryobiopsy for cholangioscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E809-E814. doi: 10.1055/a-1797-8966. eCollection 2022 Jun.

    PMID: 35692925BACKGROUND
  • Klein JT, Berger F, Linzenbold W, Jager L, Enderle MD, Bosmuller H, Mundhenk J, Schwentner C, Bolenz C. Cryobiopsy in the Upper Urinary Tract: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Device. Urology. 2019 Jan;123:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

    PMID: 30312669BACKGROUND
  • Behr J, Gunther A, Bonella F, Dinkel J, Fink L, Geiser T, Geissler K, Glaser S, Handzhiev S, Jonigk D, Koschel D, Kreuter M, Leuschner G, Markart P, Prasse A, Schonfeld N, Schupp JC, Sitter H, Muller-Quernheim J, Costabel U. S2K Guideline for Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respiration. 2021;100(3):238-271. doi: 10.1159/000512315. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

    PMID: 33486500BACKGROUND
  • Aboudara M, Maldonado F. Transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung diseases: evidence that demands a (favorable) verdict. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(20):1324. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2995. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33209904BACKGROUND
  • Hetzel J, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ, Petermann C, Reichle G, Freitag L, Dobbertin I, Franke KJ, Stanzel F, Beyer T, Moller P, Fritz P, Ott G, Schnabel PA, Kastendieck H, Lang W, Morresi-Hauf AT, Szyrach MN, Muche R, Shah PL, Babiak A, Hetzel M. Cryobiopsy increases the diagnostic yield of endobronchial biopsy: a multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):685-90. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00033011. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

    PMID: 21852332BACKGROUND
  • Herth FJ, Mayer M, Thiboutot J, Kapp CM, Sun J, Zhang X, Herth J, Kontogianni K, Yarmus L. Safety and Performance of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy for Parenchymal Lung Lesions. Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1512-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 May 7.

    PMID: 33971147BACKGROUND
  • Peveling-Oberhag J, Zimmermann C, Linzenbold W, Ott G, Enderle M, Albert JG. Bile duct tissue acquisition by cholangioscopy-guided cryobiopsy technique: first-in-human application. VideoGIE. 2023 Feb 15;8(4):158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.12.007. eCollection 2023 Apr.

    PMID: 37095838BACKGROUND
  • Franke KJ, Theegarten D, Hann von Weyhern C, Nilius G, Brueckner C, Hetzel J, Hetzel M, Ruhle KH, Enderle MD, Szyrach MN. Prospective controlled animal study on biopsy sampling with new flexible cryoprobes versus forceps: evaluation of biopsy size, histological quality and bleeding risk. Respiration. 2010;80(2):127-32. doi: 10.1159/000287251. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

    PMID: 20160432BACKGROUND
  • Thiboutot J, Illei PB, Maldonado F, Kapp CM, DeMaio A, Lee HJ, Feller-Kopman D, Lentz RJ, Sathyanarayan P, Rahman NM, Silvestri GA, Yarmus L; Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group. Safety and Feasibility of a Sheath Cryoprobe for Bronchoscopic Transbronchial Biopsy: The FROSTBITE Trial. Respiration. 2022;101(12):1131-1138. doi: 10.1159/000526876. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

    PMID: 36265451BACKGROUND
  • Thompson CC, Kumar N, Slattery J, Clancy TE, Ryan MB, Ryou M, Swanson RS, Banks PA, Conwell DL. A standardized method for endoscopic necrosectomy improves complication and mortality rates. Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

    PMID: 26748428BACKGROUND
  • Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, Jurgensen C, Will U, Gerlach R, Kreitmair C, Meining A, Wehrmann T, Rosch T. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut. 2009 Sep;58(9):1260-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.163733. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

    PMID: 19282306BACKGROUND
  • Gardner TB, Coelho-Prabhu N, Gordon SR, Gelrud A, Maple JT, Papachristou GI, Freeman ML, Topazian MD, Attam R, Mackenzie TA, Baron TH. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter U.S. series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.053. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

    PMID: 21237454BACKGROUND
  • Ramai D, McEntire DM, Tavakolian K, Heaton J, Chandan S, Dhindsa B, Dhaliwal A, Maida M, Anderloni A, Facciorusso A, Adler DG. Safety of endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy compared with percutaneous and surgical necrosectomy: a nationwide inpatient study. Endosc Int Open. 2023 Apr 4;11(4):E330-E339. doi: 10.1055/a-1994-6214. eCollection 2023 Apr.

    PMID: 37025154BACKGROUND
  • Yasuda I, Nakashima M, Iwai T, Isayama H, Itoi T, Hisai H, Inoue H, Kato H, Kanno A, Kubota K, Irisawa A, Igarashi H, Okabe Y, Kitano M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Mukai T, Sata N, Kida M, Shimosegawa T. Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: The JENIPaN study. Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):627-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344027. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

    PMID: 23807806BACKGROUND
  • Yarmus L, Akulian J, Gilbert C, Illei P, Shah P, Merlo C, Orens J, Feller-Kopman D. Cryoprobe transbronchial lung biopsy in patients after lung transplantation: a pilot safety study. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):621-626. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2290.

    PMID: 23328889BACKGROUND
  • Pajares V, Puzo C, Castillo D, Lerma E, Montero MA, Ramos-Barbon D, Amor-Carro O, Gil de Bernabe A, Franquet T, Plaza V, Hetzel J, Sanchis J, Torrego A. Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease: a randomized trial. Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):900-6. doi: 10.1111/resp.12322. Epub 2014 Jun 1.

    PMID: 24890124BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPancreatitisNecrosis

Interventions

Cryotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc

    Brigham and Womens Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Pilot, single-center, open-label, prospective, single-arm clinical study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Endoscopy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Posted

August 14, 2024

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will be shared on a case by case basis with an Institutional data transfer agreement in place.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
12 months after publication
Access Criteria
IPD requests should be made directly to the PI who will determine feasibility of the request. Institutional data transfer agreement will need to be executed to share data.

Locations