Necrosectomy With Cryotechnology for Accelerated Removal
NECTAR
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pancreatic necrosis is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis involves the irreversible death of pancreatic tissue, which can lead to severe health issues, including infections and an increased risk of death. An endoscopic procedure called direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is typically performed to remove this necrotic pancreatic tissue as a minimally invasive treatment. This procedure is performed using a thin, flexible, lighted tube called an endoscope and endoscopic instruments that are used with working channels through the scope. Current methods for removing necrotic tissue involve using endoscopic devices such as snares, baskets, nets, and forceps. However, these standard methods are often not very effective because the necrotic tissue can be sticky and hard to grasp. This DEN procedure is part of regular clinical care to treat this condition and remove necrotic tissue from the pancreas. For this research study, the same DEN procedure will be followed with the exception of the device used for the removal of the necrotic tissue. Instead of using forceps, snares, or other traditional tools, a cryoprobe will be used. Cryoprobes work by using extremely cold temperatures to freeze and adhere to the necrotic tissue, making it easier to remove. This method might be better because it can secure larger tissue samples and potentially reduce complications associated with traditional methods. Cryotechnology is successfully used in endoscopy to remove necrotic tissue, foreign bodies and more, but has not been extensively tested in pancreatic necrosis. Cryoprobes are FDA approved medical devices with an established safety record. They are used successfully in very sensitive areas such as the lungs. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryotechnology for DEN.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
March 2, 2026
February 1, 2026
1 year
August 12, 2024
February 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Technical Success Rate
To evaluate the effectiveness of cryotechnology for the removal of necrotic pancreatic tissue. Achievement of at least 70% removal of necrotic debris from the pancreatic collection being treated, as determined by change in computed tomography (CT) evaluation from baseline to 21 days post-treatment.
Baseline, Follow-up Visit Day 21
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Safety and Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Procedure Day 0, Follow-up Visit Day 21
Mean Total Procedure Time
Procedure Day 0, Reintervention (if needed)
Total Number of Reinterventions
From Procedure Day 0 through Follow-up Visit Day 21
Clinical Improvement within 72 Hours
Baseline, Procedure Day 0, up to 3 days post-procedure
Duration of Hospital Stay
From Procedure Day 0 through date of discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Cryotechnology Necrosectomy Procedure
EXPERIMENTALEnrolled subjects will undergo direct endoscopic necrosectomy using 1.7 mm single use, flexible cryoprobes, aimed at effectively removing necrotic tissue within the pancreatic cavity.
Interventions
Subjects undergo necrosectomy with 1.7 mm flexible cryoprobes, either concurrently with stent placement or post-placement, at the Investigator's discretion. The cryoprobe will freeze the necrotic tissue and extracted en-bloc. A maximum of 4 cryotechnology procedures will be performed, with each procedure aiming for significant debris removal and clinical improvement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects aged 18 years and above, inclusive of both males and females.
- Patients with symptomatic pancreatic necrosis resulting from acute pancreatitis, indicated for endoscopic necrosectomy following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage.
- Imaging indicative of ≥30% necrotic material within the pancreas.
- Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) size ≥6 cm.
- Subjects able to tolerate repeated endoscopic procedures.
- Capacity for providing informed consent.
- Understanding of study requirements, provision of written informed consent, and willingness and ability to attend required follow-up assessments through 21 (+/- 7) days.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Unwillingness to undergo repeated endoscopies.
- Presence of documented Pseudoaneurysm \> 1cm within the WOPN.
- Intervening gastric varices or unavoidable blood vessels within the access tract.
- Use of dual antiplatelet therapy or therapeutic anticoagulation that cannot be temporarily discontinued.
- Any condition deemed by the investigator to compromise the safety of undergoing an endoscopic procedure.
- Pregnancy, lactation, or absence of reliable contraception in women of childbearing potential.
- Current enrollment in another investigational trial with potential to interfere with this study's endpoint analyses.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSclead
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Related Publications (29)
Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J, Badaoui A, Bali MA, Barthet M, Besselink M, Deviere J, Oliveira Ferreira A, Gyokeres T, Hritz I, Hucl T, Milashka M, Papanikolaou IS, Poley JW, Seewald S, Vanbiervliet G, van Lienden K, van Santvoort H, Voermans R, Delhaye M, van Hooft J. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):524-546. doi: 10.1055/a-0588-5365. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
PMID: 29631305BACKGROUNDYadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068.
PMID: 23622135BACKGROUNDTrikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC, Mallery S, Freeman M, Besselink MG. Current Concepts in Severe Acute and Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Approach. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(7):1994-2007.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PMID: 30776347BACKGROUNDPinto S, Bellizzi S, Badas R, Canfora ML, Loddo E, Spada S, Khalaf K, Fugazza A, Bergamini S. Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy: Timing and Technique. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 28;57(12):1305. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121305.
PMID: 34946249BACKGROUNDBang JY, Lakhtakia S, Thakkar S, Buxbaum JL, Waxman I, Sutton B, Memon SF, Singh S, Basha J, Singh A, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S; United States Pancreatic Disease Study Group. Upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or step-up endoscopic approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis (DESTIN): a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;9(1):22-33. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00331-X. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
PMID: 37980922BACKGROUNDvan Brunschot S, Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Baron TH, Beger HG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bruno MJ, Carter R, French JJ, Coelho D, Dahl B, Dijkgraaf MG, Doctor N, Fagenholz PJ, Farkas G, Castillo CFD, Fockens P, Freeman ML, Gardner TB, Goor HV, Gooszen HG, Hannink G, Lochan R, McKay CJ, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Parks RW, Peev MP, Raraty M, Rau B, Rosch T, Rovers M, Seifert H, Siriwardena AK, Horvath KD, van Santvoort HC. Minimally invasive and endoscopic versus open necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis: a pooled analysis of individual data for 1980 patients. Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):697-706. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313341. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
PMID: 28774886BACKGROUNDMohamadnejad M, Anushiravani A, Kasaeian A, Sorouri M, Djalalinia S, Kazemzadeh Houjaghan A, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic or surgical treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E420-E428. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-9229. eCollection 2022 Apr.
PMID: 35433210BACKGROUNDAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee; Saumoy M, Trindade AJ, Bhatt A, Bucobo JC, Chandrasekhara V, Copland AP, Han S, Kahn A, Krishnan K, Kumta NA, Law R, Obando JV, Parsi MA, Trikudanathan G, Yang J, Lichtenstein DR; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee Chair. Summary: endoscopic therapies for walled-off necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jun;97(6):1001-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Apr 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 37115165BACKGROUNDvan Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Lameris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen MS, Buskens E, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.
PMID: 20410514BACKGROUNDBesselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Buskens E, Dejong CH, van Eijck CH, van Goor H, Hofker SS, Lameris JS, van Leeuwen MS, Ploeg RJ, van Ramshorst B, Schaapherder AF, Cuesta MA, Consten EC, Gouma DJ, van der Harst E, Hesselink EJ, Houdijk LP, Karsten TM, van Laarhoven CJ, Pierie JP, Rosman C, Bilgen EJ, Timmer R, van der Tweel I, de Wit RJ, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG; Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Minimally invasive 'step-up approach' versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg. 2006 Apr 11;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-6-6.
PMID: 16606471BACKGROUNDYachimski P, Landewee CA, Campisano F, Valdastri P, Obstein KL. The waterjet necrosectomy device for endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis: design, development, and preclinical testing (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):770-775. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
PMID: 32334018BACKGROUNDYan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, Shariaha RZ, Binmoeller KF, Adler DG, DeSimone M, Berzin T, Swahney M, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Diehl DL, Wang L, Ghulab A, Butt N, Siddiqui AA. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):172-179. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_108_17.
PMID: 29882517BACKGROUNDGiri M, Huang G, Puri A, Zhuang R, Li Y, Guo S. Efficacy and Safety of Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Lung Tumors, and Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;9:840702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.840702. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35372452BACKGROUNDWirsing L, Linzenbold W, Jaeger SU, Stahl P, Ott G, Leibold T, Enderle M, Albert J, Peveling-Oberhag J. A new tool for bile duct tissue sampling: ex vivo clinical evaluation of intraductal cryobiopsy for cholangioscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E809-E814. doi: 10.1055/a-1797-8966. eCollection 2022 Jun.
PMID: 35692925BACKGROUNDKlein JT, Berger F, Linzenbold W, Jager L, Enderle MD, Bosmuller H, Mundhenk J, Schwentner C, Bolenz C. Cryobiopsy in the Upper Urinary Tract: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Device. Urology. 2019 Jan;123:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
PMID: 30312669BACKGROUNDBehr J, Gunther A, Bonella F, Dinkel J, Fink L, Geiser T, Geissler K, Glaser S, Handzhiev S, Jonigk D, Koschel D, Kreuter M, Leuschner G, Markart P, Prasse A, Schonfeld N, Schupp JC, Sitter H, Muller-Quernheim J, Costabel U. S2K Guideline for Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respiration. 2021;100(3):238-271. doi: 10.1159/000512315. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
PMID: 33486500BACKGROUNDAboudara M, Maldonado F. Transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung diseases: evidence that demands a (favorable) verdict. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(20):1324. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2995. No abstract available.
PMID: 33209904BACKGROUNDHetzel J, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ, Petermann C, Reichle G, Freitag L, Dobbertin I, Franke KJ, Stanzel F, Beyer T, Moller P, Fritz P, Ott G, Schnabel PA, Kastendieck H, Lang W, Morresi-Hauf AT, Szyrach MN, Muche R, Shah PL, Babiak A, Hetzel M. Cryobiopsy increases the diagnostic yield of endobronchial biopsy: a multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):685-90. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00033011. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
PMID: 21852332BACKGROUNDHerth FJ, Mayer M, Thiboutot J, Kapp CM, Sun J, Zhang X, Herth J, Kontogianni K, Yarmus L. Safety and Performance of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy for Parenchymal Lung Lesions. Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1512-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 May 7.
PMID: 33971147BACKGROUNDPeveling-Oberhag J, Zimmermann C, Linzenbold W, Ott G, Enderle M, Albert JG. Bile duct tissue acquisition by cholangioscopy-guided cryobiopsy technique: first-in-human application. VideoGIE. 2023 Feb 15;8(4):158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.12.007. eCollection 2023 Apr.
PMID: 37095838BACKGROUNDFranke KJ, Theegarten D, Hann von Weyhern C, Nilius G, Brueckner C, Hetzel J, Hetzel M, Ruhle KH, Enderle MD, Szyrach MN. Prospective controlled animal study on biopsy sampling with new flexible cryoprobes versus forceps: evaluation of biopsy size, histological quality and bleeding risk. Respiration. 2010;80(2):127-32. doi: 10.1159/000287251. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
PMID: 20160432BACKGROUNDThiboutot J, Illei PB, Maldonado F, Kapp CM, DeMaio A, Lee HJ, Feller-Kopman D, Lentz RJ, Sathyanarayan P, Rahman NM, Silvestri GA, Yarmus L; Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group. Safety and Feasibility of a Sheath Cryoprobe for Bronchoscopic Transbronchial Biopsy: The FROSTBITE Trial. Respiration. 2022;101(12):1131-1138. doi: 10.1159/000526876. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
PMID: 36265451BACKGROUNDThompson CC, Kumar N, Slattery J, Clancy TE, Ryan MB, Ryou M, Swanson RS, Banks PA, Conwell DL. A standardized method for endoscopic necrosectomy improves complication and mortality rates. Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
PMID: 26748428BACKGROUNDSeifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, Jurgensen C, Will U, Gerlach R, Kreitmair C, Meining A, Wehrmann T, Rosch T. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut. 2009 Sep;58(9):1260-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.163733. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
PMID: 19282306BACKGROUNDGardner TB, Coelho-Prabhu N, Gordon SR, Gelrud A, Maple JT, Papachristou GI, Freeman ML, Topazian MD, Attam R, Mackenzie TA, Baron TH. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter U.S. series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.053. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
PMID: 21237454BACKGROUNDRamai D, McEntire DM, Tavakolian K, Heaton J, Chandan S, Dhindsa B, Dhaliwal A, Maida M, Anderloni A, Facciorusso A, Adler DG. Safety of endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy compared with percutaneous and surgical necrosectomy: a nationwide inpatient study. Endosc Int Open. 2023 Apr 4;11(4):E330-E339. doi: 10.1055/a-1994-6214. eCollection 2023 Apr.
PMID: 37025154BACKGROUNDYasuda I, Nakashima M, Iwai T, Isayama H, Itoi T, Hisai H, Inoue H, Kato H, Kanno A, Kubota K, Irisawa A, Igarashi H, Okabe Y, Kitano M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Mukai T, Sata N, Kida M, Shimosegawa T. Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: The JENIPaN study. Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):627-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344027. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PMID: 23807806BACKGROUNDYarmus L, Akulian J, Gilbert C, Illei P, Shah P, Merlo C, Orens J, Feller-Kopman D. Cryoprobe transbronchial lung biopsy in patients after lung transplantation: a pilot safety study. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):621-626. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2290.
PMID: 23328889BACKGROUNDPajares V, Puzo C, Castillo D, Lerma E, Montero MA, Ramos-Barbon D, Amor-Carro O, Gil de Bernabe A, Franquet T, Plaza V, Hetzel J, Sanchis J, Torrego A. Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease: a randomized trial. Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):900-6. doi: 10.1111/resp.12322. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
PMID: 24890124BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Brigham and Womens Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Endoscopy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2024
First Posted
August 14, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 12 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- IPD requests should be made directly to the PI who will determine feasibility of the request. Institutional data transfer agreement will need to be executed to share data.
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will be shared on a case by case basis with an Institutional data transfer agreement in place.