Usability and Satisfaction With an Electronic Survey Administration Application in General Population
CePRO
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to assess the usability and satisfaction of an electronic patient reported outcomes (e-PRO) mobile application. The secondary aim is to assess and compare response rates between two study groups (e-PRO group vs REDCap survey group). A potential differentiating factor between delivering surveys via smart phone and other electronic modes of delivery is the perceived advantage of being able to conveniently complete survey questionnaires at any time and any location. This could help address certain limitations of the quantitative survey method such as recall bias. Furthermore, the portability, connectivity and ubiquity of smartphones may reduce the amount of training or instructions required for users to complete a survey questionnaire on a smartphone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2020
CompletedSeptember 30, 2019
September 1, 2019
4 months
September 23, 2019
September 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Usability of e-PRO vs. emailed link: survey
A survey will be administered to compare groups on their experiences with the survey-method administration (Investigator developed survey). The following components will be taken into account: acceptability-- participant satisfaction with various aspects of the solution (e.g. content, complexity, comfort, delivery, and credibility). Adoption-- participants' intention to try; perceived barriers and facilitators for uptake. Appropriateness-- participant's perceived relevance to need; suitability to daily patient workflow. Feasibility-- suitability for using daily, weekly etc. This survey is not a scored survey.
At close-out
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survey response rate e-PRO vs emailed link
At close-out
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be enrolled for a period of 4 weeks. At baseline, we will collect demographic information on participants. During the study, participants will be asked to fill out daily and weekly surveys using an electronically link sent via email. Additionally, participants will be asked to fill out one survey once a week during the study period.
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be enrolled for a period of 4 weeks. At baseline, we will collect demographic information on participants. During the study, participants will be asked to fill out daily and weekly surveys using the e-PRO app. Additionally, participants will be asked to fill out one survey once a week during the study period. A subgroup of these participants will be asked to complete an additional interview to collect more information on their experiences using the mobile app.
Interventions
The e-PRO app is designed to further facilitate the delivery of PRO instruments in a convenient manner to participants. Through its computing capability, and user-friendly interface, the e-PRO app can collect data and implement complex scoring requirements, thus supporting the delivery of self-administered survey questionnaires.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy participants over the age of 18-65 years as assessed by the Self-Rated Health Measure.
- Fluency in English language to be able to read, understand study procedures and complete surveys administered during the study.
- Willing to travel to the downtown Boston area to participate in up to two study visits.
- Willing to participate in the research study and sign informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with a "fair" or "poor" rating on the Self-Rated Health Measure.
- Participants with EU citizenship or permanent residency
- Participants with severe cognitive, vision, hearing, or speech problems that may prevent them from answering surveys
- Participants with serious psychiatric conditions (moderate or major depressive disorder that may impair their ability to complete surveys
- Participants with any terminal illness (e.g. cancers)
- Patients with implantable devices, pacemakers or body worn electronic medical devices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Cenduit LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Partners Healthcare
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ramya S Palacholla, MD, MPH
Partners HealthCare
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not know which group (smart phone or embedded link) is the intervention vs. control group.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Partners Healthcare
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 30, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
September 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD available.