NCT04090931

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using heat-activated NiTi with superelastic NiTi archwires during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment. Primary Objective: To compare the difference in the amount of crowding in the lower incisors after 4 and 8 weeks from the start of treatment. Secondary Objectives:

  1. 1.To compare the amount of orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) in the apical region of mandibular central incisors between the two groups of archwires
  2. 2.To compare the amount of pain perception between the two groups of archwires during the 1st week after each wire placement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 3, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 26, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 9, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 9, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary outcome (Alignment efficiency)

    The study models, which should be free from any inconsistency (such as bubbles), were used to measure the Little's irregularity index (Little, 1975). This was calculated using a digital Vernier caliper to measure the extent of mesial and distal contact displacement from the mesial contact point of lower canine to that on the other side (to the nearest 0.01mm).

    2 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Root resorption

    2 months

  • Pain perception

    2 months

Study Arms (2)

Heat-Activated Nickel-Titanium Archwires

EXPERIMENTAL

Heat-activated NiTi (HANT) Group (TruFlex™ Thermal Nickel-Titanium, Ortho Technology, USA): * 0.014-inch HANT * 0.016-inch HANT

Procedure: Orthodontic treatment

Superelastic Nickel-Titanium Archwires

EXPERIMENTAL

Superelastic NiTi (SENT) Group (TruFlex™ Nickel-Titanium, Ortho Technology, USA): * 0.014-inch SENT * 0.016-inch SENT

Procedure: Orthodontic treatment

Interventions

leveling and aligning stage in orthodontics

Heat-Activated Nickel-Titanium ArchwiresSuperelastic Nickel-Titanium Archwires

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients indicated for fixed appliance orthodontic treatment who have a moderate crowding (3-6mm) according to the Little's irregularity index (LII).
  • Full set of lower permanent dentition excluding the third molars.
  • No history of trauma or root resorption in the lower incisors.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Less than 3mm of lower incisor crowding (LII) or with spaced incisors.
  • Severe crowding in the lower arch (greater than 7mm) which requires extraction.
  • Blocked-out teeth that cannot be engaged with the aligning archwire.
  • Patients with periodontally compromised teeth.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yassir A. Yassir

Baghdad, 00964, Iraq

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Nabbat SA, Yassir YA. A clinical comparison of the effectiveness of two types of orthodontic aligning archwire materials: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Dec 2;42(6):626-634. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz102.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Congenital Abnormalities

Interventions

Orthodontics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dentistry

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinding to treatment allocation was possible only for the investigator and data analyst because the clinicians could know the type of archwiers from their flexibility. All the trial documents were labeled with the study ID number, which was used for participant identification and data collection without unmasking the allocation group. This allowed the investigator to complete data collection and measurements blindly.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Orthodontic patients
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Orthodontics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2019

First Posted

September 16, 2019

Study Start

January 3, 2019

Primary Completion

April 26, 2019

Study Completion

September 9, 2019

Last Updated

September 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Materials, Methods, Results

Locations