Study Stopped
Intervention includes tasks that encourage participants to interact with the social environment which is unethical due to the outbreak of COVID-19.
New in Town-Internet Intervention for Migrants
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
New in Town is an internet intervention for migrants that aims at increasing social self-efficacy. The study aim is to evaluate its effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2020
CompletedNovember 13, 2020
November 1, 2020
3 months
August 6, 2019
November 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change on Social Self-Efficacy
Social self-efficacy will be measured with the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES). The measure consists of two subscales for measuring 1) generalized beliefs about self-efficacy (17 test items) and 2) beliefs about self-efficacy in establishing and maintaining relationships with others (6 test items). The remaining test items (7) are buffer theorems. The respondents give answers on a scale 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). In the trial, the investigators will use one subscale, which is beliefs about self-efficacy in establishing and maintaining relationships with others. Social self-efficacy will be indicated by the total sum of 6 items scores. The higher total score represents higher social self-efficacy.
Change from baseline on Social Self-Efficacy (3 weeks)
Change on Social Self-Efficacy
Social self-efficacy will be measured with the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES). The measure consists of two subscales for measuring 1) generalized beliefs about self-efficacy (17 test items) and 2) beliefs about self-efficacy in establishing and maintaining relationships with others (6 test items). The remaining test items (7) are buffer theorems. The respondents give answers on a scale 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). In the trial, the investigators will use one subscale, which is beliefs about self-efficacy in establishing and maintaining relationships with others. Social self-efficacy will be indicated by the total sum of 6 items scores. The higher total score represents higher social self-efficacy.
Change from baseline on Social Self-Efficacy (8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change on Loneliness
Change from baseline on Loneliness (3 weeks)
Change on Loneliness
Change from baseline on Loneliness (8 weeks)
Change on Social support
Change from baseline on Social support (3 weeks)
Change on Social support
Change from baseline on Social support (8 weeks)
Change on Satisfaction with life
Change from baseline on Satisfaction with life (3 weeks)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
System usability
3-week post-test (only experimental group)
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants gain access to the internet intervention after the baseline measurement (pre-test).
Waitlist control group
OTHERParticipants gain access to the internet intervention 8 weeks after the baseline measurement (pre-test).
Interventions
New in Town is an internet intervention for migrants that aims at increasing social self-efficacy. Exercises in the intervention are based on the principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and relate to four sources of self-efficacy beliefs-mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasions, and emotional and physiological states (Bandura, 1997).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age of at least 18 years
- having changed the place of residence in the last 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- \- no access to a internet
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Warsaw, Warszawa, 03-815, Poland
Related Publications (12)
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
BACKGROUNDConnolly, J. (1989). Social self-efficacy in adolescence: Relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 21(3), 258.
BACKGROUNDConstantine MG, Okazaki S, Utsey SO. Self-concealment, social self-efficacy, acculturative stress, and depression in African, Asian, and Latin American international college students. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004 Jul;74(3):230-241. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.74.3.230.
PMID: 15291700BACKGROUNDDiener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
PMID: 16367493BACKGROUNDGierveld, J. D. J., & Van Tilburg, T. (1999). Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methodology.
BACKGROUNDŁuszczyńska, A., Mazurkiewicz, M., Kowalska, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). Berlińskie skale wsparcia społecznego (BSSS): Wyniki wstępnych badań nad adaptacją skal i ich własnośnciami psychometrycznymi = Berlin social support scales (BSSS): Polish version of BSSS and preliminary results on its psychometric properties. Studia Psychologiczne, 44(3), 17-27.
BACKGROUNDSherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671.
BACKGROUNDSmith, H. M., & Betz, N. E. (2000). Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 8(3), 283-301.
BACKGROUNDSchrepp, M., Pérez Cota, M., Gonçalves, R., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Adaption of user experience questionnaires for different user groups. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 629-640.
BACKGROUNDUnited Nations (2017). 2017 International Migration Report.
BACKGROUNDMaj A, Matynia M, Michalak N, Bis A, Andersson G. New in Town-An internet-based self-efficacy intervention for internal migrants: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299638. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38452136DERIVEDRogala A, Szczepaniak M, Michalak N, Andersson G. Internet-based self-help intervention aimed at increasing social self-efficacy among internal migrants in Poland: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2020 Apr 23;21:100322. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100322. eCollection 2020 Sep.
PMID: 32328440DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Rogala, PhD
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2019
First Posted
September 12, 2019
Study Start
January 14, 2020
Primary Completion
April 3, 2020
Study Completion
May 8, 2020
Last Updated
November 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share