NCT04081636

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the difference between 2 prostate biopsy methods, transrectal (through the rectal wall) and transperineal (through the skin) needle biopsy. Men who are in need of prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicions of prostate cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either transrectal or transperineal approach. This research study will scientifically determine if one biopsy method is better than the other in reducing complications and improving cancer detection.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
840

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2019

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 23, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

September 5, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate biopsyPSAinfectionbleeding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of infectious complications

    Whether or not patient had an infection after the biopsy

    30 days

  • Clinically significant cancer detection rate

    The rate of grade group 2 prostate cancer detected in each study arm

    14 days

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Rate of Bleeding complications

    30 days

  • Tolerability under local anesthesia

    30 days

  • Patient reported urinary function measures using IPSS questionaire

    30 days

  • Cost of the procedures

    30 days

  • Patient reported sexual function measures using IIEF questionaire

    30 days

Study Arms (4)

Systematic Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ultrasound guided; needle inserted through the rectum to reach the prostate

Procedure: Systematic Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

Targeted Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

MRI-guided; needle inserted through the rectum to reach the prostate

Procedure: Targeted Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

Systematic Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound guided; needle inserted directly through the skin to reach the prostate

Procedure: Systematic Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

Targeted Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

EXPERIMENTAL

MRI-guided; needle inserted directly through the skin to reach the prostate

Procedure: Targeted Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

Interventions

Through the rectum

Also known as: ultrasound guided
Systematic Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

Through the rectum

Also known as: MRI guided
Targeted Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)

Through the perineal skin

Also known as: ultrasound guided
Systematic Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

Through the perineal skin

Also known as: MRI guided
Targeted Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients who are scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer as part of their regular medical care
  • Either with or without an MRI

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with no access to rectum (due to previous rectal surgery)
  • Any abnormalities of the perineal skin (e.g. infection)
  • Patients whose procedure requires sedation or general anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Albany Medical College

Albany, New York, 12208, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Choi YH, Kang MY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Chang Jeong B, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

    PMID: 30415878BACKGROUND
  • Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.

    PMID: 29552975BACKGROUND
  • Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouviere O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

    PMID: 28336078BACKGROUND
  • Wu YP, Li XD, Ke ZB, Chen SH, Chen PZ, Wei Y, Huang JB, Sun XL, Xue XY, Zheng QS, Xu N. Risk factors for infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Sep 17;11:1491-1497. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S171162. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30271182BACKGROUND
  • Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E, Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W, Loeb S. Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

    PMID: 27543165BACKGROUND
  • Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V, Stroup SP. An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy. J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.103. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

    PMID: 28363690BACKGROUND
  • Saade EA, Suwantarat N, Zabarsky TF, Wilson B, Donskey CJ. Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli Infections After Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Pathog Immun. 2016;1(2):243-257. doi: 10.20411/pai.v1i2.123.

    PMID: 27774521BACKGROUND
  • Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb 13;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1573-0.

    PMID: 30760274BACKGROUND
  • Skouteris VM, Crawford ED, Mouraviev V, Arangua P, Metsinis MP, Skouteris M, Zacharopoulos G, Stone NN. Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison. Rev Urol. 2018;20(1):19-25. doi: 10.3909/riu0785.

    PMID: 29942197BACKGROUND
  • Roberts MJ, Bennett HY, Harris PN, Holmes M, Grummet J, Naber K, Wagenlehner FME. Prostate Biopsy-related Infection: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Prevention Strategies, and Management Approaches. Urology. 2017 Jun;104:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

    PMID: 28007492BACKGROUND
  • Altok M, Kim B, Patel BB, Shih YT, Ward JF, McRae SE, Chapin BF, Pisters LL, Pettaway CA, Kim J, Demirel HC, Davis JW. Cost and efficacy comparison of five prostate biopsy modalities: a platform for integrating cost into novel-platform comparative research. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):524-532. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0056-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

    PMID: 29988098BACKGROUND
  • Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A; Collaborators. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000156.

    PMID: 30835607BACKGROUND
  • Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA. Initial Experience Performing In-office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Urology. 2018 May;115:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

    PMID: 29409845BACKGROUND
  • Mian BM, Kaufman RP Jr, Berstein A, Fisher HAG. Letter: Complications Following Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Results of the ProBE-PC Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2024 Sep;212(3):511-512. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004081. Epub 2024 Jun 7. No abstract available.

  • Mian BM, Feustel PJ, Aziz A, Kaufman RP Jr, Bernstein A, Fisher HAG. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2024 Jul;212(1):21-31. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003979. Epub 2024 May 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsInfectionsHemorrhage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Badar M Mian, MD

    Albany Medical College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized 1:1 to either trans-rectal needle biopsy (TR-Bx) or Trans-perineal biopsy (TP-Bx) of the prostate. Both arms, either with or without MRI guided biopsy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Posted

September 9, 2019

Study Start

September 2, 2019

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

December 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations