Urology San Antonio MRI/MicroUS Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares micro-ultrasound image targeted prostate biopsy with multi-parametric MRI targeted biopsy in men indicated for prostate biopsy due to suspicion of prostate cancer. Both imaging techniques will be applied to each subject and compared, along with systematic biopsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 4, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 21, 2021
CompletedApril 21, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
November 27, 2018
March 2, 2021
March 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Cancer
Comparison of subject-level detection rate of clinically significant cancer (csPCa, defined as Grade Group 2 or higher) between micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy and mpMRI targeted biopsy.
At time of biopsy
Study Arms (2)
Micro-Ultrasound Biopsy
EXPERIMENTALMRI Targeted Biopsy
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Micro-ultrasound targeted biopsy using the ExactVu micro-ultrasound system
Multiparametric MRI targeted biopsy using software assisted MRI/US fusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men presenting for prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
- years old
- Available mpMRI images and report, performed according to the PI-RADS v2 standard
You may not qualify if:
- Men with anorectal abnormalities preventing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy
- Men who are unable to provide their own informed consent
- Prostate volume on MRI \> 100cc
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Exact Imaginglead
Study Sites (1)
Urology San Antonio - Pasteur Plaza Surgery Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to issues with marking of targeted samples the primary endpoint was modified to distinguish between the two devices used in the arms rather than biopsy annotations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Brian Wodlinger
- Organization
- Exact Imaging
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David R Talley, MD
Urology San Antonio
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Investigator performing the micro-ultrasound biopsy will be blinded to the MRI report, and the investigator performing the MRI targeted biopsy will be blinded to the micro-ultrasound images and targets.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2018
First Posted
December 4, 2018
Study Start
November 28, 2018
Primary Completion
November 4, 2019
Study Completion
November 4, 2019
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Results First Posted
April 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share