Bolus Versus Continuous Enteral Tube Feeding
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stress metabolisms induced by severe trauma, large abdominal surgery procedures, sepsis, etc. leads to metabolic changes, which increase energy expenditure, enhanced protein catabolism, insulin resistance. Muscle proteolysis is massively stimulated. Critically ill patients pay for survival with a loss of muscles. Enteral nutrition, especially protein delivery to critically ill, is very important for optimizing their outcome. Standard enteral feeding regiments are generally based on continuous feeding, which is thought to be better tolerated by critically ill patients with easier glycaemic control by continuous infusion of insulin, translated in less glycaemic variability. But this approach is not physiological, continuous feeding does not allow protein synthesis. Optimal protein synthesis requires a pulsatile increase in branched-chain amino acids. Bolus feeding activates the entrohormonal axis (bioactive peptides, insulin), and stimulates skeletal muscle synthesis to the maximum extent. The question is, whether bolus enteral feeding in critically ill patients with limited gastrointestinal function delivers a greater amount of protein, improves nutritional parameters, with higher quadriceps muscle layer thickness (QMLT) and muscle strength.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedDecember 7, 2022
December 1, 2022
2 years
September 3, 2019
December 6, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in nutritional parameters - serum albumin
The development of the serum albumin levels in g/dL will be observed.
7 days
Change in nutritional parameters - prealbumin
The development of the serum albumin levels in mg/dL will be observed.
7 days
Change in inflammatory parameters - C-reactive protein (CRP)
The development of inflammatory parameters in mg/L will be observed.
7 days
Change in muscle mass
The development of muscle mass (circumference in centimetres) will be measured.
7 days
Change in muscle strength
The development of muscle strength (in kilograms) will be measured.
7 days
Study Arms (2)
Bolus enteral feeding
EXPERIMENTALThe patients randomized into this study arm will receive bolus enteral feeding. The study subjects will undergo the following interventions: * Quadriceps Muscle Layer Fitness measurement * Muscle Strength measurement * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation * Sequential Organ Failure Assessment * Nutritional Risk Screening * Energy and Protein Intake
Continuous enteral feeding
EXPERIMENTALThe patients randomized into this study arm will receive bolus enteral feeding. The study subjects will undergo the following interventions: * Quadriceps Muscle Layer Fitness measurement * Muscle Strength measurement * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation * Sequential Organ Failure Assessment * Nutritional Risk Screening * Energy and Protein Intake
Interventions
The QMLF examination will be performed in all study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding.
All study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding, will undergo measurement of the muscle strength using dynamometer.
All study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding, will undergo the APACHE evaluation.
All study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding, will undergo the SOFA assessment.
All study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding, will undergo the NSR screening.
The amount of energy and protein supplied to the study subjects will be observed daily in all study subjects, with both bolus and continuous enteral feeding, the percentage of the planned daily intake will be analyzed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- polytrauma
- major abdominal surgery
- sepsis
- ICU stay
- enteral feeding tube
- artificial ventilation
You may not qualify if:
- contraindication of enteral feeding
- infaust prognosis
- prolonged shock (more than 24 hours)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 70852, Czechia
Related Publications (4)
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
PMID: 23303884BACKGROUNDSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 22019563BACKGROUNDFetterplace K, Deane AM, Tierney A, Beach L, Knight LD, Rechnitzer T, Forsyth A, Mourtzakis M, Presneill J, MacIsaac C. Targeted full energy and protein delivery in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a pilot randomised control trial (FEED Trial). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 20;4:52. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0249-9. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29484196BACKGROUNDTillquist M, Kutsogiannis DJ, Wischmeyer PE, Kummerlen C, Leung R, Stollery D, Karvellas CJ, Preiser JC, Bird N, Kozar R, Heyland DK. Bedside ultrasound is a practical and reliable measurement tool for assessing quadriceps muscle layer thickness. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Sep;38(7):886-90. doi: 10.1177/0148607113501327. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
PMID: 23980134BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcela Káňová, MD,PhD
University Hospital Ostrava
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking will be used in the study.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
December 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.