NCT04075448

Brief Summary

This study investigates the effect of acute walnut consumption on the cognitive behaviour, mood, brain activation, and markers of inflammation in young adults. In a within subjects design participants will receive a 50 g walnut or placebo intervention in a randomised order with a one week washout between interventions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2019

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 8, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 20, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

August 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

FlavonoidOmega 3 Fatty Acid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (30)

  • Delayed Recall

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    2 hours following intervention.

  • Delayed Recall

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    4 hours following intervention.

  • Delayed Recall

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    6 hours following intervention.

  • Word Recognition

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    2 hours following intervention.

  • Word Recognition

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    4 hours following intervention.

  • Word Recognition

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

    6 hours following intervention.

  • Response interference accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    2 hours following intervention.

  • Response interference accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    4 hours following intervention.

  • Response interference accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    6 hours following intervention.

  • Response interference reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    2 hours following intervention

  • Response interference reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    4 hours following intervention

  • Response interference reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

    6 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task Accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

    2 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task Accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

    4 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task Accuracy

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

    6 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

    2 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

    4 hours following intervention

  • Switching Task reaction time

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

    6 hours following intervention

  • N2

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

    2 hours following intervention

  • N2

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

    4 hours following intervention

  • N2

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

    6 hours following intervention

  • P3

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

    2 hours following intervention

  • P3

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

    4 hours following intervention

  • P3

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

    6 hours following intervention

  • Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

    2 hours following intervention

  • Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

    4 hours following intervention

  • Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

    6 hours following intervention

  • BDNF

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

    2 hours following intervention

  • BDNF

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

    4 hours following intervention

  • BDNF

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

    6 hours following intervention

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    2 hours following intervention.

  • Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    4 hours following intervention.

  • Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    6 hours following intervention.

  • EEG Spectral Analysis.

    2 hours following intervention.

  • EEG Spectral Analysis.

    4 hours following intervention.

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control - 50g Walnut

EXPERIMENTAL

Control condition followed by experimental condition.

Other: ControlOther: 50 g Walnut

50 g Walnut - Control

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental condition followed by control condition.

Other: ControlOther: 50 g Walnut

Interventions

ControlOTHER

100 grams breakfast cereal

50 g Walnut - ControlControl - 50g Walnut

50 grams walnuts mixed with 50 gram breakfast cereal.

50 g Walnut - ControlControl - 50g Walnut

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy
  • Normal or corrected hearing and vision

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoker.
  • Allergic to treatment contents.
  • Currently on medication which may interfere with the treatment
  • Anaemic

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Reading

Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Bell L, Lamport DJ, Butler LT, Williams CM. A Review of the Cognitive Effects Observed in Humans Following Acute Supplementation with Flavonoids, and Their Associated Mechanisms of Action. Nutrients. 2015 Dec 9;7(12):10290-306. doi: 10.3390/nu7125538.

    PMID: 26690214BACKGROUND
  • Carey AN, Fisher DR, Joseph JA, Shukitt-Hale B. The ability of walnut extract and fatty acids to protect against the deleterious effects of oxidative stress and inflammation in hippocampal cells. Nutr Neurosci. 2013 Jan;16(1):13-20. doi: 10.1179/1476830512Y.0000000023. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

    PMID: 23321679BACKGROUND
  • Fisher DR, Poulose SM, Bielinski DF, Shukitt-Hale B. Serum metabolites from walnut-fed aged rats attenuate stress-induced neurotoxicity in BV-2 microglial cells. Nutr Neurosci. 2017 Feb;20(2):103-109. doi: 10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000150. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

    PMID: 25153536BACKGROUND
  • Gomez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):568-78. doi: 10.1038/nrn2421.

    PMID: 18568016BACKGROUND
  • Haider S, Batool Z, Tabassum S, Perveen T, Saleem S, Naqvi F, Javed H, Haleem DJ. Effects of walnuts (Juglans regia) on learning and memory functions. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011 Nov;66(4):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s11130-011-0260-2.

    PMID: 22048906BACKGROUND
  • Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Clavero P, Toledo E, Estruch R, Salas-Salvado J, San Julian B, Sanchez-Tainta A, Ros E, Valls-Pedret C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Mediterranean diet improves cognition: the PREDIMED-NAVARRA randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;84(12):1318-25. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304792. Epub 2013 May 13.

    PMID: 23670794BACKGROUND
  • Miller MG, Thangthaeng N, Poulose SM, Shukitt-Hale B. Role of fruits, nuts, and vegetables in maintaining cognitive health. Exp Gerontol. 2017 Aug;94:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

    PMID: 28011241BACKGROUND
  • Nooyens AC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, van Boxtel MP, van Gelder BM, Verhagen H, Verschuren WM. Fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive decline in middle-aged men and women: the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Br J Nutr. 2011 Sep;106(5):752-61. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511001024. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

    PMID: 21477405BACKGROUND
  • O'Brien J, Okereke O, Devore E, Rosner B, Breteler M, Grodstein F. Long-term intake of nuts in relation to cognitive function in older women. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 May;18(5):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0014-6.

    PMID: 24886736BACKGROUND
  • Perez-Cano FJ, Castell M. Flavonoids, Inflammation and Immune System. Nutrients. 2016 Oct 21;8(10):659. doi: 10.3390/nu8100659.

    PMID: 27775647BACKGROUND
  • Poulose SM, Bielinski DF, Shukitt-Hale B. Walnut diet reduces accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins and inflammation in the brain of aged rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2013 May;24(5):912-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

    PMID: 22917841BACKGROUND
  • Pribis P, Bailey RN, Russell AA, Kilsby MA, Hernandez M, Craig WJ, Grajales T, Shavlik DJ, Sabate J. Effects of walnut consumption on cognitive performance in young adults. Br J Nutr. 2012 May;107(9):1393-401. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004302. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

    PMID: 21923981BACKGROUND
  • Ros E, Hu FB. Consumption of plant seeds and cardiovascular health: epidemiological and clinical trial evidence. Circulation. 2013 Jul 30;128(5):553-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001119. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23897849BACKGROUND
  • Sanchez-Villegas A, Galbete C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA, Razquin C, Salas-Salvado J, Estruch R, Buil-Cosiales P, Marti A. The effect of the Mediterranean diet on plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels: the PREDIMED-NAVARRA randomized trial. Nutr Neurosci. 2011 Sep;14(5):195-201. doi: 10.1179/1476830511Y.0000000011.

    PMID: 22005283BACKGROUND
  • Valls-Pedret C, Sala-Vila A, Serra-Mir M, Corella D, de la Torre R, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez-Lapiscina EH, Fito M, Perez-Heras A, Salas-Salvado J, Estruch R, Ros E. Mediterranean Diet and Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1094-1103. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1668.

    PMID: 25961184BACKGROUND
  • Willis LM, Shukitt-Hale B, Cheng V, Joseph JA. Dose-dependent effects of walnuts on motor and cognitive function in aged rats. Br J Nutr. 2009 Apr;101(8):1140-4. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508059369.

    PMID: 18778529BACKGROUND
  • Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A. Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jan;24(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083.

    PMID: 10702749BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Claire M Williams, PhD

    University of Reading

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants will be aware the possible contents of each treatment, however, neither the participants or investigators will be aware of which treatment the participants are receiving at the point of testing. All analysis will be performed in relation to a treatment code which will only be revealed once analysis is completed.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants will be assigned to both the walnut and control conditions in a randomised order.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair of Neuroscience

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2019

First Posted

August 30, 2019

Study Start

November 8, 2019

Primary Completion

October 30, 2020

Study Completion

October 30, 2020

Last Updated

August 20, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The full dataset will be anonymized and made available on the University of Reading Research Data Archive.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Data will be become available upon publication of study findings. Once published, the data will remain permanently available.
Access Criteria
The data will be Open Access and licensed as Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Locations