Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS With Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway
TheraPPP
3 other identifiers
interventional
920
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Treatment of patients with Hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is complex. Therapies that have been shown to save the lives of patients with HRF and ARDS are available but they are not always provided. To reduce practice variation and improve adherence to evidence-informed therapies, the investigators developed the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HRF) and ARDS with Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway. The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedJune 18, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.6 years
August 22, 2019
June 15, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
FEASIBILITY (Fidelity) Fidelity of the intervention using a composite fidelity score
The composite fidelity score is measured daily for each patient. It is scored out of 5 and awards 1 point for each fidelity indicator (listed below) that investigators are able to measure, 1. If ventilated ≥24 hours, is a height measured (step 1) 2. If arterial to inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2 ratio or PF ratio) ≤300, is the medial tidal volume ≤8mL/kg stratified by volume and pressure control (step2/3) 3. If PF ratio ≤300, is a plateau pressure measured (step 3) 4. IF patient has HRF and PF ratio ≤150, was neuromuscular blockade used in that 24 hour period (step 4) 5. If the patient has HRF and PF ratio ≤150 and FiO2 ≥0.6, did the patient receive prone ventilation (step 5).
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
FEASIBILITY (Economic) Cost per safe ventilation day
Cost per safe ventilation day from the perspective of the health care system
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
ACCEPTABILITY Pathway Acceptability measured using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA)
The primary outcome for acceptability is the proportion of seven TFA constructs (7 constructs of acceptability) graded with a median score of 5 or above from a 7-point Likert scale, indicating agreement.
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
The proportion of ventilated patients with a height measured
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
The proportion of ventilated patients with a height measured within 1 hour of admission
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
The proportion of patients ventilated ≥24 hours with a height measured
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
The median time to height measurement from admission
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
The proportion of patient days with arterial to inspired oxygen ratio(PaO2:FiO2 ratio or PF ratio) ≤300 with a tidal volume ≤8mL/kg stratified by volume and pressure control
4 months (after the post-implementation period)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
TheraPPP Pathway
EXPERIMENTALWe will perform a before and after study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HRF and ARDS Pathway during its pilot implementation. All mechanically ventilated patients will enter the pathway during the one month implementation and one year post-implementation periods. To assess Pathway feasibility we will collect patient data for approximately two years and one month: one year immediately prior to implementation, one month during, and one year following implementation. To assess acceptability of the pathway we will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.
Interventions
TheraPPP Steps: Step 1. All mechanically ventilated patients will have a height measured and documented. Step 2. Screening for HRF. Step 3. Initiate Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV). Step 4. Paralysis. Step 5. Prone Positioning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Foothills Medical Center Intensive Care Unit (Pod A)
- Invasively mechanically ventilated
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Alberta Health servicescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Foothills Hospital Intensive Care Unit
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ken Parhar, MD MSc
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Intensivist & Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2019
First Posted
August 28, 2019
Study Start
August 23, 2019
Primary Completion
March 16, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
June 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share