NCT04070053

Brief Summary

Treatment of patients with Hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is complex. Therapies that have been shown to save the lives of patients with HRF and ARDS are available but they are not always provided. To reduce practice variation and improve adherence to evidence-informed therapies, the investigators developed the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HRF) and ARDS with Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway. The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
920

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 23, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 16, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

August 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • FEASIBILITY (Fidelity) Fidelity of the intervention using a composite fidelity score

    The composite fidelity score is measured daily for each patient. It is scored out of 5 and awards 1 point for each fidelity indicator (listed below) that investigators are able to measure, 1. If ventilated ≥24 hours, is a height measured (step 1) 2. If arterial to inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2 ratio or PF ratio) ≤300, is the medial tidal volume ≤8mL/kg stratified by volume and pressure control (step2/3) 3. If PF ratio ≤300, is a plateau pressure measured (step 3) 4. IF patient has HRF and PF ratio ≤150, was neuromuscular blockade used in that 24 hour period (step 4) 5. If the patient has HRF and PF ratio ≤150 and FiO2 ≥0.6, did the patient receive prone ventilation (step 5).

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • FEASIBILITY (Economic) Cost per safe ventilation day

    Cost per safe ventilation day from the perspective of the health care system

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • ACCEPTABILITY Pathway Acceptability measured using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA)

    The primary outcome for acceptability is the proportion of seven TFA constructs (7 constructs of acceptability) graded with a median score of 5 or above from a 7-point Likert scale, indicating agreement.

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • The proportion of ventilated patients with a height measured

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • The proportion of ventilated patients with a height measured within 1 hour of admission

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • The proportion of patients ventilated ≥24 hours with a height measured

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • The median time to height measurement from admission

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • The proportion of patient days with arterial to inspired oxygen ratio(PaO2:FiO2 ratio or PF ratio) ≤300 with a tidal volume ≤8mL/kg stratified by volume and pressure control

    4 months (after the post-implementation period)

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

TheraPPP Pathway

EXPERIMENTAL

We will perform a before and after study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HRF and ARDS Pathway during its pilot implementation. All mechanically ventilated patients will enter the pathway during the one month implementation and one year post-implementation periods. To assess Pathway feasibility we will collect patient data for approximately two years and one month: one year immediately prior to implementation, one month during, and one year following implementation. To assess acceptability of the pathway we will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.

Other: TheraPPP Pathway

Interventions

TheraPPP Steps: Step 1. All mechanically ventilated patients will have a height measured and documented. Step 2. Screening for HRF. Step 3. Initiate Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV). Step 4. Paralysis. Step 5. Prone Positioning.

TheraPPP Pathway

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Foothills Medical Center Intensive Care Unit (Pod A)
  • Invasively mechanically ventilated

You may not qualify if:

  • none

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Foothills Hospital Intensive Care Unit

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Ken Parhar, MD MSc

    University of Calgary

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: We will perform a before and after study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HRF and ARDS Pathway during its pilot implementation. All mechanically ventilated patients will enter the pathway during the one month implementation period and one year post-implementation period. To assess Pathway feasibility we will collect patient data for two years and one month: one year immediately prior to implementation as well as one month during plus one year following implementation. To assess acceptability of the pathway we will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the pathway.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Intensivist & Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2019

First Posted

August 28, 2019

Study Start

August 23, 2019

Primary Completion

March 16, 2021

Study Completion

March 30, 2022

Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations