Influence of HFNO on Spontaneous Ventilation in Patients of Different ASA Risk During Analgo-sedation for Vitrectomy
Influence of High-flow Nasal Oxygenation on Spontaneous Ventilation in Patients of Different Anesthesia Risk Class During Analgo-sedation for Vitrectomy, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pars plana vitrectomy is minimally invasive endoscopic procedure which is usually performed in moderate analgo-sedation given by anesthesiologist combined with topical anesthesia and retrobulbar or Subtenon block performed by surgeon. Intravenously applied anesthetics can often lead to slower breathing rate or cessation of breathing which introduces risk of low blood oxygen level despite careful adjustment of anesthetics' dose and application of standard low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO). Respiratory instability is often accompanied by circulatory instability manifested by disturbances of heart rate and blood pressure. LFNO provides maximally 40% inspired fraction of oxygen and can cause discomfort of a patient due to coldness and dryness of inspired gas. On the other hand, high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) can bring up to 100% of inspired oxygen fraction to patient, providing noninvasive pressure support of 3-7 cmH2O in patients' upper airway which ensures better oxygenation especially in higher anesthesia risk patients. Because of carrying warmed and humidified air/oxygen mixture via soft nasal cannula, HFNO is better tolerated by patients. In this trial investigators will compare effect of HFNO to LFNO during intravenously applied standardized analgo-sedation given for vitrectomy in normal weight patients of low and high anesthesia risk. Investigators hypothesize that normal weight patients of low and high anesthesia risk, whose breathing pattern is preserved, receiving HFNO vs. LFNO during standardized analgo-sedation for vitrectomy will be more respiratory and circulatory stable, preserving normal blood O2 and CO2 level, breathing pattern, heart rate and blood pressure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 13, 2019
August 1, 2019
6 months
August 2, 2019
August 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Maintaining oxygenation above the level of hypoxemia. Measure: peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) before application of LFNO or HFNO.
Normal range \>92% Acceptable deflection from normal values of peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) significant for hypoxemia is ≤92%, while all values above will be considered normal. SpO2 will be observed during procedure so that we can confirm or exclude differences connected with practical application of LFNO and HFNO.
Time 0=before oxygenation
Maintaining oxygenation above the level of hypoxemia. Measure: peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) 15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO.
Normal range \>92% Acceptable deflection from normal values of peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) significant for hypoxemia is ≤92%, while all values above will be considered normal. SpO2 will be observed during procedure so that we can confirm or exclude differences connected with practical application of LFNO and HFNO.
Time 1=15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO
Maintaining oxygenation above the level of hypoxemia. Measure: peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) 5 minutes after discontinuing analgo-sedation and oxygenation (LFNO and HFNO).
Normal range \>92% Acceptable deflection from normal values of peripheral blood saturation (SpO2) significant for hypoxemia is ≤92%, while all values above will be considered normal. SpO2 will be observed during procedure so that we can confirm or exclude differences connected with practical application of LFNO and HFNO.
Time 2=5 minutes after discontinuing analgo-sedation and oxygenation (LFNO and HFNO)
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Maintaining of expiratory efficiency of spontaneous breathing below hypercapnia value. Measure: expiratory level of CO2 (expCO2) before oxygenation by LFNO or HFNO.
Time 0=before oxygenation by LFNO or HFNO
Maintaining of expiratory efficiency of spontaneous breathing below hypercapnia value. Measure: expiratory level of CO2 (expCO2) 15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO.
Time 1=15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO
Maintaining of expiratory efficiency of spontaneous breathing below hypercapnia value. Measure: expiratory level of CO2 (expCO2) 5 minutes after discontinuing analgo-sedation and oxygenation (LFNO or HFNO).
Time 2=5 minutes after discontinuing analgo-sedation and oxygenation (LFNO or HFNO).
Maintaining of normopnoea and spontaneous ventilation: frequency of breathing. Measure: frequency of breathing before oxygenation by LFNO or HFNO.
Time 0=before oxygenation by LFNO or HFNO.
Maintaining of normopnoea and spontaneous ventilation: frequency of breathing. Measure: frequency of breathing 15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO.
Time 1=15 minutes after institution of LFNO or HFNO.
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
ASA I/LFNO
ACTIVE COMPARATORLow-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) O2 flow 5L/min, FiO2 40%
ASA II/LFNO
ACTIVE COMPARATORLow-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) O2 flow 5L/min, FiO2 40%
ASA III/LFNO
ACTIVE COMPARATORLow-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) O2 flow 5L/min, FiO2 40%
ASA I/HFNO
EXPERIMENTALHigh Flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) O2 flow 40L/min, FiO2 40%
ASA II/HFNO
EXPERIMENTALHigh Flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) O2 flow 40L/min, FiO2 40%
ASA III/HFNO
EXPERIMENTALHigh Flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) O2 flow 40L/min, FiO2 40%
Interventions
Active comparator LFNO: O2 flow 5 L/min, FiO2 40%
Active comparator LFNO: O2 flow 5 L/min, FiO2 40%
Active comparator LFNO: O2 flow 5 L/min, FiO2 40%
Experimental HFNO: O2 flow 40 L/min, FiO2 40%
Experimental HFNO: O2 flow 40 L/min, FiO2 40%
Experimental HFNO: O2 flow 40 L/min, FiO2 40%
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- normal weight ASA patients of risk class I, II and III
- moderate intravenous analgo-sedation
- pars plana vitrectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Conventional vitrectomy
- Obese
- Diseases of peripheral blood vessels
- Hematological diseases
- Psychiatric diseases
- Sideropenic anaemia
- Patient's refusal
- Ongoing chemotherapy or irradiation
- Remifentanyl and Xomolix allergies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University clinical hospital centre Zagreb, Croatia
Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
Related Publications (8)
Mehta S, Blinder KJ, Shah GK, Grand MG. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;46(3):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 27.
PMID: 21784208BACKGROUNDBecker DE, Haas DA. Management of complications during moderate and deep sedation: respiratory and cardiovascular considerations. Anesth Prog. 2007 Summer;54(2):59-68; quiz 69. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2007)54[59:MOCDMA]2.0.CO;2.
PMID: 17579505BACKGROUNDFrat JP, Goudet V, Girault C. [High flow, humidified-reheated oxygen therapy: a new oxygenation technique for adults]. Rev Mal Respir. 2013 Oct;30(8):627-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 29. French.
PMID: 24182650BACKGROUNDBooth AWG, Vidhani K, Lee PK, Thomsett CM. SponTaneous Respiration using IntraVEnous anaesthesia and Hi-flow nasal oxygen (STRIVE Hi) maintains oxygenation and airway patency during management of the obstructed airway: an observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):444-451. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew468.
PMID: 28203745BACKGROUNDNagata K, Morimoto T, Fujimoto D, Otoshi T, Nakagawa A, Otsuka K, Seo R, Atsumi T, Tomii K. Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Decreased Use of Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1390-6. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04026. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PMID: 26106206BACKGROUNDNi YN, Luo J, Yu H, Liu D, Ni Z, Cheng J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. Can High-flow Nasal Cannula Reduce the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):764-775. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
PMID: 28089816BACKGROUNDMorris K. Revising the Declaration of Helsinki. Lancet. 2013 Jun 1;381(9881):1889-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60951-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 23734387BACKGROUNDMoher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):2-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-002-0188-x. Epub 2003 Jan 31.
PMID: 12673431BACKGROUND
Related Links
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). ASA physical status classification system 2014 Oct \[internet\]. schaumburg, Illinois, USA: ASA;2014.
- Interactive Statistical Pages \[internet\]. USA: Statpages.net;c2019 \[cited 2019 Aug1\]
- Programiz \[internet\]. Kupandole, Nepal: Parewa Labs Pvt. Ltd \[cited 2019 Aug 1\]. Flowchart in programming.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Anesthesiologist who interviews and examines patients scheduled for PPV under analgo-sedation will enroll eligible participants and offer procedure explanation with possibility to sign uniformed written consent. Unique personal hospital admission number (UPHAN) will be assigned to all eligible participants. Participants will be randomized to control or intervention group by using random numbers generator. Anesthesiologist who implements anesthesia will receive nontransparent envelope with assigned intervention provided by independent investigator and will not decide which participant will receive LFNO or HFNO. However, attending anesthesiologist and participants will unavoidably be aware of type of oxygenation applied. Collected data are objective measures. Investigator who collects data after procedure will be unaware of study protocol and will enter data to formatted database. Participants' data will be noted under UPHAN. Outcome assessors will be unaware of intervention applied.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, specialist of anesthesiology, reanimatology and intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2019
First Posted
August 13, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share