Beveled-Tip Versus(vs) Standard-Tip Vitrectomy Probe
High-speed Beveled Tip Versus Standard Tip Vitrectomy Probe: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency of the new Utravit High-Speed 10000 cpm Beveled Probe to the current standard vitrector probe- Alcon (non-beveled) Ultravit 7500 cpm. Study Design: This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe with the current Alcon vitrector probe in a cohort of patients undergoing routine vitrectomy surgery. Hypothesis: The Advanced Ultravit high-speed beveled probe will show non-inferiority to the standard, Alcon (non-beveled) Ultravit 7500 cpm with regards to time to completion of vitrectomy and surgical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 21, 2022
CompletedOctober 21, 2022
September 1, 2022
2.3 years
August 29, 2019
August 11, 2022
September 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Completion of Core Vitrectomy and Shave of Vitreous Base
Intraoperative efficiency of vitrectomy surgery regarding time to completion of core vitrectomy and shave of vitreous base
Time to completion of core vitrectomy and shave of vitreous base (12 ± 3 minutes )
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Intraoperative Complications
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Alcon Advanced Ultravit High-Speed Vitrectomy Probe
ACTIVE COMPARATOROn the day of surgery, patients will be randomized to the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe or the current non-beveled Alcon Probe. All patients will undergo routine vitrectomy surgery as scheduled; patients will be unaware of the vitrector probe used. Time to completion of vitrectomy and time to completion of vitreous base shave will be recorded by study staff unaware of the vitrector probe used. All examination will be repeated as regularly scheduled postoperative visits by a reader unaware of which probe was used. Safety will be assessed at each visit by evaluation for any adverse events.
Alcon Non-Beveled Tip Vitrectomy Probe
ACTIVE COMPARATOROn the day of surgery, patients will be randomized to the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe or the current non-beveled Alcon Probe. All patients will undergo routine vitrectomy surgery as scheduled; patients will be unaware of the vitrector probe used. Time to completion of vitrectomy and time to completion of vitreous base shave will be recorded by study staff unaware of the vitrector probe used. All examination will be repeated as regularly scheduled postoperative visits by a reader unaware of which probe was used. Safety will be assessed at each visit by evaluation for any adverse events.
Interventions
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe with the current Alcon vitrector probe in a cohort of patients undergoing routine vitrectomy surgery.
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the Ultravit High-Speed Beveled Probe with the current Alcon vitrector probe in a cohort of patients undergoing routine vitrectomy surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The study population will be male and female patients 18 years old or older with the presence of pathology requiring routine vitreoretinal surgery (vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, vitreomacular traction, macular hole, epiretinal membrane) without previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Ability to consent to procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous incisional intraocular surgery other than uncomplicated cataract surgery with intraocular lens placement
- Inability to consent for procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centerlead
- Alcon Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marybeth Carter
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shriji N Patel, MD
Vanderbilt Eye Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization and data storage will occur in RedCap. Patients will be randomized the day of surgery by a masked study coordinator. The randomization numbers will be generated using the following procedure to ensure that treatment assignment is unbiased and concealed from patients and investigator staff. A patient randomization list will be produced by the IRT provider using a validated system that automates the random assignment of patient numbers to randomization numbers. These randomization numbers are linked to the different treatment arms. The randomization scheme for patients will be reviewed and approved by a member of the Randomization Group.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2019
First Posted
September 3, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 21, 2022
Results First Posted
October 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share