NCT04079465

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to examine if automated oxygen delivery with O2matic allows for faster weaning from oxygen supply and better oxygen control than manually controlled oxygen therapy for patients admitted to the emergency department with acute hypoxemia. Furthermore it will be tested if O2matic compared to manual control allows for earlier discharge.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 6, 2019

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2019

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

September 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

closed-loopoxygen treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Probability of weaning from oxygen within 24 hours

    Fraction of patients weaned from oxygen supplementation within 24 hours

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Probability of weaning from oxygen within 12 hours

    12 hours

  • Duration of admission

    30 days

  • Time within SpO2 target interval

    24 hours

  • Time with minor hypoxemia

    24 hours

  • Time with severe hypoxemia

    24 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

O2matic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual care plus O2matic controlled oxygen therapy for a maximum of 24 hours or until weaning from oxygen supplementation

Device: O2matic

Manual

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care plus manual controlled oxygen therapy by nursing staff. O2matic is used in monitoring mode to measure SpO2 continuously.

Interventions

O2maticDEVICE

O2matic controls oxygen supply with a closed-loop feedback from a pulse oximeter. The aim is to maintain SpO2 within a predefined target interval according to guidelines for the specific condition causing hypoxemia, with the lowest possible supplementation of oxygen.

O2matic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admission with hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • Age \>= 18 years
  • Expected duration of admission \> 24 hours
  • Need for oxygen supplementation to maintain SpO2 \>= 88 % (patients at risk of hypercapnia) or SpO2 \>= 94 % (other patients)
  • Cognitively able to participate in the study
  • Willing to participate and give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Need or anticipated need for mechanical ventilation (intermittent Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is allowed)
  • Patients with CO-poisoning or other condition with unreliable SpO2.
  • Patients in need of oxygen supplementation at more than 10 liters/min
  • Pregnancy
  • Cognitive or language barriers for participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Amager Hospital

Copenhagen, 2300, Denmark

Location

Hvidovre Hospital

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 May 15;4(1):e000170. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000170. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28883921BACKGROUND
  • Cornet AD, Kooter AJ, Peters MJ, Smulders YM. The potential harm of oxygen therapy in medical emergencies. Crit Care. 2013 Apr 18;17(2):313. doi: 10.1186/cc12554.

    PMID: 23635028BACKGROUND
  • Chu DK, Kim LH, Young PJ, Zamiri N, Almenawer SA, Jaeschke R, Szczeklik W, Schunemann HJ, Neary JD, Alhazzani W. Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1693-1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30479-3. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

    PMID: 29726345BACKGROUND
  • Hansen EF, Hove JD, Bech CS, Jensen JS, Kallemose T, Vestbo J. Automated oxygen control with O2matic(R) during admission with exacerbation of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 14;13:3997-4003. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S183762. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30587955BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory InsufficiencyHypoxia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ove Andersen, DMSc

    Hvidovre University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Open label randomized controlled parallel study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2019

First Posted

September 6, 2019

Study Start

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

October 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations