The Acute Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Cervical Range of Motion, Strength and Proprioception.
RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
2
Brief Summary
the aim of the study was to investigate the immediate influence of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on cervical range of motion, strength and proprioception
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2019
CompletedAugust 29, 2019
July 1, 2019
3 months
August 1, 2019
August 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cervical Proprioception: Joint position accuracy method using cervical range of motion instrument.
Joint position accuracy method using cervical range of motion instrument. Participants were asked to sit and put on the CROM instrument, then they were instructed to start moving their head to one of directions then the assessor stopped them at 30 degrees and told them to feel the amount of movement and muscle tension, this was repeated 3 times as a reference, then they were asked to do the movement with the eyes closed until they reach the target angle, this was repeated for 3 times, this was done for each direction and the assessor recorded the results. Cervical proprioception was done for flexion, extension, right side bending, left side bending, right and left rotation
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Range Of Motion
1 day
Muscle strength
1 day
Study Arms (3)
PNF pattern
EXPERIMENTALPNF patterns were performed using Dynamic of reversals technique which is characterized as active motion alternating from one direction (agonist) to the opposite (antagonist) without relaxing. The cervical patterns consisted of 1. Cervical flexion with right rotation followed by extension with left rotation. 2. Cervical flexion with left rotation followed by extension with right rotation.
PNF stretching
EXPERIMENTALPNF stretching was done using contract-relax-antagonist contract (CRAC) technique for cervical flexors, extensors, right and left lateral flexors, right rotators and left rotators.
control
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants allocated to the control group received ineffective passive ROM.
Interventions
The participants were asked to sit on a chair, the therapist performed the pattern of movement himself then passively applied the pattern on the participant then asked the participant to perform the pattern, and the therapist observed and corrected the movement if it was done improperly.Then participants were told that the therapist will resist their movement, they were also told to keep breathing normally and to report any discomfort and/or pain.After mastering the pattern,the therapist placed one hand on the participant's mandibular and the other hand approximately between parietal and occipital bones to apply resistance through out the ROM, each pattern performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 1-2-minute rest between sets.
was done for 6 repetitions with hold for 6 seconds in position of stretch and sub maximal isometric contraction for 6 seconds, 1-2-minute rest was given before changing the target muscle group
ineffective passive ROM for 10 repetitions for flexion, extension, right and left side bending and right and left rotation, it was done from neutral position to the limit of motion without causing any stretch to the muscle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Neck disability index score of 5 or less
- Able to understand and follow instructions
- Above 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical trauma
- History of cervical inter-vertebral disc pathology
- Rheumatic diseases
- Whiplash syndrome
- History of surgeries to the neck, face and shoulders
- History of systemic diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yeditepe Universitylead
- Bahçeşehir Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Yeditepe University
Ataşehir, Istanbul, 34755, Turkey (Türkiye)
Bahcesehir University
Beşiktaş, Istanbul, 34353, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
SULE DEMIRBASISTANBUL
Yeditepe University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2019
First Posted
August 5, 2019
Study Start
February 20, 2019
Primary Completion
May 27, 2019
Study Completion
May 27, 2019
Last Updated
August 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share