NCT04033614

Brief Summary

The open abdomen can occur as a result of various diseases. After infections of the abdomen, compartment syndromes or traumata, it is essential for survival (1). This condition of the open abdomen lasts from days to months. Within a very short time, the fascia and abdominal wall structures retract in such a way that direct abdominal closure is often impossible. In addition, there is a pronounced intraabdominal oedema, which additionally increases the space required by the abdominal organs. Therefore, it is clinically indispensable to increase the space of the intraabdominal organs in this life-threatening situation. After the laparotomy (opening of the abdomen) has been performed, it is therefore not closed. However, the natural traction on the abdominal wall, in particular on the fascia, the attached musculature as well as skin and subcutis, no longer exists in this situation. As a result, these structures retract over the period of the existing laparostoma. In the present study, the CE-certified medical device Fasciotens Abdomen will be used to prove the functionality of this device and the user feasibility. The basic principle of Fasciotens Abdomen is the ventrally directed pulling force on the two fascial edges via an external device with support on the thorax and pelvis. The possibility to apply a traction to the fascia from the moment of opening the abdomen without reducing the intraabdominal space is absolutely new and the rationale of this technique. The objective of this study is to prove the obvious prevention of fascial retraction through the Fasciotens Abdomen device.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
3mo left

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress97%
Aug 2019Aug 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 18, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 5, 2019

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6.7 years

First QC Date

July 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Laparotomy, open abdomen, fascia, retraction, intraabdominal oedema

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Closure rate of the abdominal wall fascia

    The primary endpoint of the study is the closure rate of the fascia.

    Up to 24 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Patients with Laparostoma

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients needing a laparostoma will be treated with the fasciotens abdomen device. The distance between the fasciae will be measured frequently using a ruler. 12 months after the treatment an ultrasound measurement will be performed to assess hernia formation

Device: Fasciotens-Abdomen

Interventions

The basic principle of Fasciotens Abdomen is the ventrally directed pulling force on the two fascial edges via an external device with support on the thorax and pelvis. A commercially available resorbable surgical mesh is sewn into the fascia margin. Commercial surgical sutures attached to this net are then attached to a height-adjustable suspension, which is connected to an external support on the thorax and pelvis. This ensures continuous traction to the two fascial edges. The remaining wound surface can then be treated with conventional dressing material.

Patients with Laparostoma

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Laparostoma with a resorbable net and planned or necessary "second look" operation.
  • Age of majority
  • Signed informed consent form or in the case of patients unable to give consent, signature from the authorised representative/legal carevier or consultant.

You may not qualify if:

  • A Moribund patient with a life expectancy of less than 24 hours despite laparostomy
  • Unstable thorax or known severe skeletal instability which impaires the use of the fasciotens abdomen device.
  • Open wounds or infections at the potential contact points of the Fasciotens abdomen device
  • Known cardiac insufficiency with ejection fraction less than 35%
  • Patients with lung failure (ARDS) and the need for abdominal positioning within the next 24h
  • Persons who are accommodated in a mental hospital or an insititution on official or judicial instruction
  • Persons who are dependent on or have an employment relationship with the principal investigator
  • Other conditions which, at the judgement of the investigator, militate against the use of the investigational product
  • Minority

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N. Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg. 2014 Oct;12(10):1105-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

    PMID: 25174789BACKGROUND
  • Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, Chambers A, Arapova N, Ogston S, Amin AI. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems--historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):e429-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03045.x.

    PMID: 22487141BACKGROUND
  • Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Grendar J, Ball CG, Robertson HL, Ouellet JF, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick AW. Negative-pressure wound therapy for critically ill adults with open abdominal wounds: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):629-39. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c130e.

    PMID: 22929494BACKGROUND
  • Carlson GL, Patrick H, Amin AI, McPherson G, MacLennan G, Afolabi E, Mowatt G, Campbell B. Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy. Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8.

    PMID: 23478532BACKGROUND
  • Cheatham ML, Demetriades D, Fabian TC, Kaplan MJ, Miles WS, Schreiber MA, Holcomb JB, Bochicchio G, Sarani B, Rotondo MF. Prospective study examining clinical outcomes associated with a negative pressure wound therapy system and Barker's vacuum packing technique. World J Surg. 2013 Sep;37(9):2018-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2080-z.

    PMID: 23674252BACKGROUND
  • Cheatham ML, Safcsak K. Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival? Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):402-7. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b9e9b1.

    PMID: 20095067BACKGROUND
  • Miller RS, Morris JA Jr, Diaz JJ Jr, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1365-71; discussion 1371-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196004.49422.af.

    PMID: 16394910BACKGROUND
  • Vidal MG, Ruiz Weisser J, Gonzalez F, Toro MA, Loudet C, Balasini C, Canales H, Reina R, Estenssoro E. Incidence and clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c7a4d.

    PMID: 18520642BACKGROUND
  • Raeburn CD, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Johnson JL, Meldrum DR, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Burch JM. The abdominal compartment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery. Am J Surg. 2001 Dec;182(6):542-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00821-2.

    PMID: 11839314BACKGROUND
  • Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA, Ciraulo DL, Richart CL, Burns RP. Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma. 2000 Feb;48(2):201-6; discussion 206-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00001.

    PMID: 10697075BACKGROUND
  • Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Zarzaur BL, Maish GO 3rd, Minard G, Schroeppel TJ, Fabian TC. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma. 2008 Aug;65(2):337-42; discussion 342-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817fa451.

    PMID: 18695468BACKGROUND
  • De Waele JJ, Leppaniemi AK. Temporary abdominal closure techniques. Am Surg. 2011 Jul;77 Suppl 1:S46-50.

    PMID: 21944452BACKGROUND
  • Hatch QM, Osterhout LM, Podbielski J, Kozar RA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB, Cotton BA. Impact of closure at the first take back: complication burden and potential overutilization of damage control laparotomy. J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1503-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823cd78d.

    PMID: 22182860BACKGROUND
  • Burlew CC, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Bensard DD, Johnson JL, Barnett CC. One hundred percent fascial approximation can be achieved in the postinjury open abdomen with a sequential closure protocol. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):235-41. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318236b319.

    PMID: 22310132BACKGROUND
  • Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, Holcomb JB, Shrestha B, Okoye O, Inaba K, Bee TK, Fabian TC, Whelan J, Ivatury RR; AAST Open Abdomen Study Group. Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):113-20; discussion 1120-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827891ce.

    PMID: 23271085BACKGROUND
  • Lambertz A, Mihatsch C, Roth A, Kalverkamp S, Eickhoff R, Neumann UP, Klink CD, Junge K. Fascial closure after open abdomen: initial indication and early revisions are decisive factors--a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

    PMID: 25447607BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intra-Abdominal HypertensionPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPeritonitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Compartment SyndromesMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPancreatitisPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesIntraabdominal InfectionsInfectionsPeritoneal Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Roman Marius Eickhoff, Dr. med.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Specialist in surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2019

First Posted

July 26, 2019

Study Start

August 5, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations