An Implementation Model for Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Prescribing
Development and Validation of an Integrated Implementation Model for Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Prescribing
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this proposal is to compare clinical outcomes, implementation metrics (i.e., patient reach and clinician adoption), and clinician preferences of two designs (customized vs. commercial) of a clinical decision support (CDS). Beta blocker prescribing for patients with heart failure will be used as a test case. The best practices in CDS design, including the user-centered design will be incorporated into the customized CDS and compared to a commercially-available CDS in the electronic health record using a cluster randomized trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 23, 2019
CompletedMay 6, 2022
May 1, 2022
3 months
July 8, 2019
May 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in prescription of Beta blocker (BB)
Number of prescriptions of an evidence based BB during a primary care office visit.
6 months post CDS implementation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Reach
6 months post CDS implementation
Clinician Adoption
6 months post CDS implementation
Factors Influencing Clinician Adoption of the CDS per Qualitative Interviews
6 months post CDS implementation
Study Arms (2)
Customized CDS
EXPERIMENTALThe customized CDS will be designed and implemented with comprehensive application of known best practice principles in CDS design. The recommendation will be to initiate an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure.
Commercial CDS
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe commercial CDS is available to all institutions using the Epic electronic health record vendor, but violates some CDS design best practices, notably not being tailored to the end users of a given health system. The recommendation will be to initiate an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure.
Interventions
Active computerized clinical decision support alert within the electronic health record that recommends initiation of an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prescribing primary care clinicians at University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) who provide care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Health
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Related Publications (1)
Trinkley KE, Kroehl ME, Kahn MG, Allen LA, Bennett TD, Hale G, Haugen H, Heckman S, Kao DP, Kim J, Matlock DM, Malone DC, Page Nd RL, Stine J, Suresh K, Wells L, Lin CT. Applying Clinical Decision Support Design Best Practices With the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model Versus Reliance on Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 22;9(3):e24359. doi: 10.2196/24359.
PMID: 33749610DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katy E Trinkley, PharmD
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2019
First Posted
July 22, 2019
Study Start
June 24, 2019
Primary Completion
September 23, 2019
Study Completion
September 23, 2019
Last Updated
May 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share