Written vs Electronic Safety Planning Study
Written Safety Planning vs the Safety Net App: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Safety planning is a brief, ED-feasible intervention which has been demonstrated to save lives and has been universally recommended by every recent expert consensus panel on suicide prevention strategies. In one popular version of the safety plan developed by Stanley et al, the patient is encouraged to write out the following items: identifying personal signs of a crisis; helpful internal coping strategies; social contacts or settings which may distract from a crisis; using family members or friends for help when in crisis; mental health professionals who can be contacted when in crisis; and restricting access to lethal means. This study aims to find out how valuable an electronic safety plan is compared to a traditional paper safety plan. People who are visiting the emergency department for thoughts of self-harm will be asked to participate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 16, 2021
CompletedMarch 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
3 months
July 18, 2019
June 23, 2021
March 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Acceptability of Intervention
The number of patients approached who agree to allow trained non-clinical staff to assist with safety planning.
Up to 12 hours
Length of Stay
The length of stay in the ED for patients approached who agree to allow trained non-clinical staff to assist with safety planning.
Up to 12 hours
Satisfaction With Safety Planning
Evaluate patient satisfaction with safety planning. This will be assessed by having the patient rate their experience with the safety planning process on a 7-point Likert scale (1 - strongly disagree; 2 - disagree; 3 - moderately disagree; 4 - neutral; 5 - moderately agree; 6 - agree; 7 - strongly agree). A Likert scale measures how much someone disagrees or agrees with a particular statement.
Up to 12 hours
Study Arms (2)
Written Safety Plan
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will complete a traditional written suicide safety plan.
Electronic Safety Plan
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete a suicide safety plan in the Safety Net app using a tablet.
Interventions
The Safety Net app is an electronic version of a safety plan and it is available for download in Apple's App Store. A preview of the app is available at: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/stanley-brown-safety-plan/id695122998. This app is owned by Two Penguins Studios, LLC. It was developed in partnership with the New York State Office of Mental Health. Unlike the paper version, the Safety Net app allows participants to email a copy of their safety plan to whomever they wish. It also allows patients to dial 911 or the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline from the app.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting for suicidal ideation (SI) or after a suicide attempt to the UAMS ED
- Willingness to engage in safety planning with trained non-clinical staff
- Have not already filled out a safety plan at the current visit
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 or \>89 years of age
- Incarcerated or in police custody
- Non-English-speaking or Non-English-writing (as translators will not be available for this study)
- Critically-ill (or appear to be critically-ill)
- Intoxicated with alcohol or other substance(s)
- ED staff objection to patient enrollment in study
- Unwilling or unable to complete the safety plan electronically
- Unwilling or unable to use a tablet device to complete the safety plan
- Unwilling or unable to show/email the safety plan to clinical and research staff
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Wilson
- Organization
- UAMS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael P Wilson, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Arkansas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2019
First Posted
July 19, 2019
Study Start
September 15, 2020
Primary Completion
December 28, 2020
Study Completion
December 28, 2020
Last Updated
March 21, 2023
Results First Posted
August 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share