NCT04024189

Brief Summary

Since the 2015 Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board ruling, the consent process in the UK has had to change. In practice, this means that doctors must ask themselves whether the patient knows about the material risks of the treatment being proposed, alternatives to the treatment, and whether reasonable care has been taken to ensure the patient actually knows this. This study aims to determine patients' perspectives of consent for major cancer surgery in light of the Lanarkshire ruling.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 14, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patients understanding of the risks associated with the procedure they will be having and the alternatives available to them was assessed using a study specific questionnaire.

    Was the patient made aware by the clinical care team of the risks associated with their procedure and the alternatives available to them. Were they able to make an informed choice. This will be measured using a patient questionnaire

    6 weeks

  • Patients views and feelings regarding their experiences in relation to support from healthcare professionals was assessed using a study specific patient questionnaire.

    Did patients feel that healthcare professionals provided them with sufficient information and support to make an informed decision in respect of their procedure. This will be measured using a questionnaire completed by patients.

    6 week

Interventions

SurveyOTHER

Patients were given a questionnaire/survey to complete in respect of their satisfaction of the consent process for their surgical procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients undergoing surgery during a 6 week period at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

You may qualify if:

  • All patients who have been admitted and undergone surgery within a 6 week period between April - June 2018.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any patient who could not complete the survey questionnaire i.e. English was not their first language or to unwell to complete.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Omer Aziz

    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2019

First Posted

July 18, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

August 10, 2018

Last Updated

July 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share individual participant data with other researchers.

Locations