Study Stopped
End of inclusions
Effects of Motor Imagery on Motor Learning and Motor Retention in Octogenarian.
IMAge-8
2 other identifiers
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aging is associated with impairments in cognitive function, particularly motor learning and memorizing, impacting functional capacities. Older adults are still able to learn new skills but at a slower rate, and they forget quickly the new-learned skill because of an alteration in motor memory. Motor imagery, which is a mental simulation of an action without actual execution, has been demonstrated to improve performance in young adults and stabilize performance after a short break in older adults. However, in very old adults (\>80 years old) for whom the decline in motor and cognitive functions is greater, it is unknown whether motor imagery training during a short break is still efficient. Previous studies on old adults were performed on upper limb muscles. Because aging differentially affects upper and lower limb muscles, the present study will aim to explore the effects of motor imagery on motor memorizing in both upper and lower limb muscles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2022
CompletedMarch 15, 2022
March 1, 2022
2.2 years
July 11, 2019
March 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Performance at the manual task (Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)) (s)
Comparison of performance at the manual task (Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)) results in post-test between experimental and control group. Measured in seconds when performing manual task.
Day: 0
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Performance at the motor task (s)
Day: 7
Learning capacity of manual task (Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT))
Day: 0
Learning capacity of motor task (hopscotch)
Day: 7
Test of 6 minutes walking (m)
Day: 0
Test of Get-up-and-Go (s)
Day: 0
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALPatient aged over 80 years old will be included. They will have motor imagery training of manual task and motor imagery training of motor task.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient aged over 80 years old will be included. They will have emotionally neutral film as training of manual task and emotionally neutral film as training of motor task.
Interventions
They will have a motor imagery as training manual task for 30 minutes. They will have 3 tests for performing manual task before training (pretest) and after training (post-test).
They will have a motor imagery as training motor task for 30 minutes before performing this task. They will have 3 tests for performing motor task before training (pretest) and after training (post-test).
They will have to watch an emotionally neutral as training manual task for 30 minutes before performing this task. They will have 3 tests for performing manual task before training (pretest) and after training (post-test).
They will have to watch an emotionally neutral as training motor task for 30 minutes before performing this task. They will have 3 tests for performing motor task before training (pretest) and after training (post-test).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being part of the Proof cohort
- Signed written consent form
- Affiliated to social security
You may not qualify if:
- Pathology or chirurgical intervention causing locomotor disorder
- Neurological or psychic pathology
- Use psychotropic drugs
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) \< 20
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Léonard FEASSON, MD PhD
CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2019
First Posted
July 12, 2019
Study Start
December 9, 2019
Primary Completion
February 14, 2022
Study Completion
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
March 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share