NCT04011436

Brief Summary

Introduction: The patellofemoral pain syndrome (SPF) is one of the most frequent pathologies generated by the knee joint. Conservative treatment with physiotherapy exercises reduces pain and improves functional capacity in the short and medium term. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of combining a program of muscle strengthening exercises for the core, hip and knee on anterior knee pain in non-athletic patients with SPF. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trial clinical trial, designed to evaluate the effect of two muscle strengthening programs in people with SPF (Group A: exercises for core, hip and knee, Group B: exercises for hip and knee), during eight weeks of intervention in people between 15 and 40 years of age, with a clinical diagnosis of SPF, with a level of mild to moderate physical activity. The Kujala test was used to measure pain and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 13, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 13, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2019

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2019

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 23, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 23, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 21, 2019

Results QC Date

May 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

anterior knee painpatellofemoral pain syndrome AND treatmentpatellofemoral pain AND diagnosispatellofemoral pain syndrome AND exercisepatellofemoral pain AND physiotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Assessment of Change in Pain and Function Before and After Treatment With Kujala´s Test: Presented as Percentages and 95% Confidence Interval.

    The Kujala patellofemoral pain scale, is an assessment tool developed to assesses pain and function in patients with disorders of the patellofemoral joint and consists of 13 questions, each with three to five response options, scored from 0 to 5, or 0 to 10, depending on the question. The lowest possible total value is 0 and corresponds to patients who are in a worse functional health condition. The highest possible total value is 100, for those that do not have any alteration and are in optimal condition. The results below, are presented as percentages and 95% confidence interval.

    The next table shows the distribution of the 13 domains of the Kujala´Test by intervention group at baseline (Time point 1, one day before intervention). "Assessed at baseline and after treatment, only baseline pre-specified to be reported".

  • Assessment of Change in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a numeric scale from 0 to 10 to measure pain (been 0 no pain and 10 worse pain).

    The pain assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Patellofemoral Misalignment With Q Angle´s Exam

    The Q angle assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention).

  • Change in Core Strength With McGill´s Exam

    The Core strength assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)

  • Change in Quadriceps and Gluteus Strength With Squat´s Test

    Quadriceps and gluteus Strength assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)

  • Change in Static Balance With Single Leg Stance

    Static Balance assesment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)

  • Change in the Total Amount (Work, Transport, Home and Recreation) of Physical Activity Reported in Minutes and Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form

    Physical Activity will be measured at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)

Study Arms (2)

Core, Hip and knee.

EXPERIMENTAL

Physical Exercises to strengthen the core, hip and knee.

Other: Strengthening program

Hip and Knee

SHAM COMPARATOR

Physical Exercises to strengthen the hip and knee.

Other: Strengthening program

Interventions

Both protocols lasted eight (8) weeks, the anatomical conditioning phase was carried out in two weeks of intervention, followed by 4 weeks of strengthening or strength increase and two additional weeks as a final or maintenance phase, at the end of which performed the final evaluations to identify if there were differences in the groups after the physiotherapeutic intervention. Group A: 28 exercises Group B: 24 exercises

Core, Hip and knee.Hip and Knee

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral misalignment with knee CT, aged between 15 and 40 years.
  • Patients with clinical signs of retropatellar pain at rest or in the following activities: going up or down stairs, jumping, running, doing squats, kneeling, or sitting for a long time.
  • Pain or apprehension to the mobilization of the patella.
  • Crepitus with pain when performing squats.
  • Confirmatory CT of unilateral or bilateral patellofemoral misalignment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinical history or clinical evidence of patellofemoral dislocation, subluxation or osteoarthrosis of the knees.
  • Dysfunction of the ligaments, bursa, meniscus, patellar tendon or synovial plica of the knee.
  • Traumatic lesions of ligaments or meniscus or patients with osteoarthrosis secondary to congenital conditions.
  • Clinical history of orthopedic surgery in lower limbs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Bogotá, 111321, Colombia

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Fulkerson JP. A Practical Guide to Understanding and Treating Patellofemoral Pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Mar/Apr;46(2):101-103.

    PMID: 28437495BACKGROUND
  • Witvrouw E, Sneyers C, Lysens R, Victor J, Bellemans J. Reflex response times of vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis in normal subjects and in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Sep;24(3):160-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1996.24.3.160.

    PMID: 8866275BACKGROUND
  • Van Der Heijden RA, Lankhorst NE, Van Linschoten R, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Van Middelkoop M. Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: an abridged version of Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;52(1):110-33. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

    PMID: 26158920BACKGROUND
  • Selfe J, Janssen J, Callaghan M, Witvrouw E, Sutton C, Richards J, Stokes M, Martin D, Dixon J, Hogarth R, Baltzopoulos V, Ritchie E, Arden N, Dey P. Are there three main subgroups within the patellofemoral pain population? A detailed characterisation study of 127 patients to help develop targeted intervention (TIPPs). Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):873-80. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094792. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

    PMID: 26834185BACKGROUND
  • Grelsamer RP. Patellar nomenclature: the Tower of Babel revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jul;(436):60-5.

    PMID: 15995421BACKGROUND
  • Bloomer BA, Durall CJ. Does the Addition of Hip Strengthening to a Knee-Focused Exercise Program Improve Outcomes in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome? J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Nov;24(4):428-33. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2014-0184. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

    PMID: 25365356BACKGROUND
  • De Blaiser C, Roosen P, Willems T, Danneels L, Bossche LV, De Ridder R. Is core stability a risk factor for lower extremity injuries in an athletic population? A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Mar;30:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.08.076. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

    PMID: 29246794BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Interventions

Resistance Training

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Conditioning, HumanExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pt. Luisa Prieto
Organization
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Study Officials

  • Juan Alzate Granados

    Universidad Nacional de Colombia

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
SNOSE: Sequentially Numbered, Opaque Sealed Envelopes. The forty subjects of the experimental procedure were assigned to the two intervention groups from three steps: 1. A paper / charcoal sheet was placed on an Assignation paper marked with Group A or Group B, 2. Then they were lined with aluminum foil, also rectangular and 3. They were finally inserted in a white envelope which was sealed with glue. Forty of these envelopes were made, twenty for Group A and the other half for Group B, after that, they were mixed in a cardboard box and then enumerated one by one at random until the 40 envelopes were completed. Each envelope was delivered in order of numbering to each of the patients who were entering the treatment. The investigator directed the strengthening program and another Physical Therapist addressed the tests.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Experimental study type controlled clinical trial, designed to evaluate the effect of two muscle strengthening programs in people with patellofemoral pain syndrome (Group A: Exercises for core, hip and knee and Group B: exercises for hip and knee).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physical Therapist and Master´ candidate in Physical Therapist in Sport and Physical Activity

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2019

First Posted

July 8, 2019

Study Start

August 15, 2018

Primary Completion

January 13, 2019

Study Completion

April 13, 2019

Last Updated

November 23, 2021

Results First Posted

November 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigators are not yet sure of sharing the IPD (individual participant data) of this study because they want to publish an article first and then decide.

Locations