Therapeutic Effect of Two Muscle Strengthening Programs in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: The patellofemoral pain syndrome (SPF) is one of the most frequent pathologies generated by the knee joint. Conservative treatment with physiotherapy exercises reduces pain and improves functional capacity in the short and medium term. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of combining a program of muscle strengthening exercises for the core, hip and knee on anterior knee pain in non-athletic patients with SPF. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trial clinical trial, designed to evaluate the effect of two muscle strengthening programs in people with SPF (Group A: exercises for core, hip and knee, Group B: exercises for hip and knee), during eight weeks of intervention in people between 15 and 40 years of age, with a clinical diagnosis of SPF, with a level of mild to moderate physical activity. The Kujala test was used to measure pain and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 23, 2021
CompletedNovember 23, 2021
October 1, 2021
5 months
June 21, 2019
May 26, 2021
October 22, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of Change in Pain and Function Before and After Treatment With Kujala´s Test: Presented as Percentages and 95% Confidence Interval.
The Kujala patellofemoral pain scale, is an assessment tool developed to assesses pain and function in patients with disorders of the patellofemoral joint and consists of 13 questions, each with three to five response options, scored from 0 to 5, or 0 to 10, depending on the question. The lowest possible total value is 0 and corresponds to patients who are in a worse functional health condition. The highest possible total value is 100, for those that do not have any alteration and are in optimal condition. The results below, are presented as percentages and 95% confidence interval.
The next table shows the distribution of the 13 domains of the Kujala´Test by intervention group at baseline (Time point 1, one day before intervention). "Assessed at baseline and after treatment, only baseline pre-specified to be reported".
Assessment of Change in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a numeric scale from 0 to 10 to measure pain (been 0 no pain and 10 worse pain).
The pain assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Patellofemoral Misalignment With Q Angle´s Exam
The Q angle assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention).
Change in Core Strength With McGill´s Exam
The Core strength assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)
Change in Quadriceps and Gluteus Strength With Squat´s Test
Quadriceps and gluteus Strength assessment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)
Change in Static Balance With Single Leg Stance
Static Balance assesment will be done at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)
Change in the Total Amount (Work, Transport, Home and Recreation) of Physical Activity Reported in Minutes and Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form
Physical Activity will be measured at two different time points (Time point 1 is baseline, one day before intervention and Time point 2 is 8 weeks post-intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Core, Hip and knee.
EXPERIMENTALPhysical Exercises to strengthen the core, hip and knee.
Hip and Knee
SHAM COMPARATORPhysical Exercises to strengthen the hip and knee.
Interventions
Both protocols lasted eight (8) weeks, the anatomical conditioning phase was carried out in two weeks of intervention, followed by 4 weeks of strengthening or strength increase and two additional weeks as a final or maintenance phase, at the end of which performed the final evaluations to identify if there were differences in the groups after the physiotherapeutic intervention. Group A: 28 exercises Group B: 24 exercises
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral misalignment with knee CT, aged between 15 and 40 years.
- Patients with clinical signs of retropatellar pain at rest or in the following activities: going up or down stairs, jumping, running, doing squats, kneeling, or sitting for a long time.
- Pain or apprehension to the mobilization of the patella.
- Crepitus with pain when performing squats.
- Confirmatory CT of unilateral or bilateral patellofemoral misalignment.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical history or clinical evidence of patellofemoral dislocation, subluxation or osteoarthrosis of the knees.
- Dysfunction of the ligaments, bursa, meniscus, patellar tendon or synovial plica of the knee.
- Traumatic lesions of ligaments or meniscus or patients with osteoarthrosis secondary to congenital conditions.
- Clinical history of orthopedic surgery in lower limbs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Bogotá, 111321, Colombia
Related Publications (7)
Fulkerson JP. A Practical Guide to Understanding and Treating Patellofemoral Pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Mar/Apr;46(2):101-103.
PMID: 28437495BACKGROUNDWitvrouw E, Sneyers C, Lysens R, Victor J, Bellemans J. Reflex response times of vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis in normal subjects and in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Sep;24(3):160-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1996.24.3.160.
PMID: 8866275BACKGROUNDVan Der Heijden RA, Lankhorst NE, Van Linschoten R, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Van Middelkoop M. Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: an abridged version of Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;52(1):110-33. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
PMID: 26158920BACKGROUNDSelfe J, Janssen J, Callaghan M, Witvrouw E, Sutton C, Richards J, Stokes M, Martin D, Dixon J, Hogarth R, Baltzopoulos V, Ritchie E, Arden N, Dey P. Are there three main subgroups within the patellofemoral pain population? A detailed characterisation study of 127 patients to help develop targeted intervention (TIPPs). Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):873-80. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094792. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
PMID: 26834185BACKGROUNDGrelsamer RP. Patellar nomenclature: the Tower of Babel revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jul;(436):60-5.
PMID: 15995421BACKGROUNDBloomer BA, Durall CJ. Does the Addition of Hip Strengthening to a Knee-Focused Exercise Program Improve Outcomes in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome? J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Nov;24(4):428-33. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2014-0184. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25365356BACKGROUNDDe Blaiser C, Roosen P, Willems T, Danneels L, Bossche LV, De Ridder R. Is core stability a risk factor for lower extremity injuries in an athletic population? A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Mar;30:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.08.076. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
PMID: 29246794BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pt. Luisa Prieto
- Organization
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Juan Alzate Granados
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- SNOSE: Sequentially Numbered, Opaque Sealed Envelopes. The forty subjects of the experimental procedure were assigned to the two intervention groups from three steps: 1. A paper / charcoal sheet was placed on an Assignation paper marked with Group A or Group B, 2. Then they were lined with aluminum foil, also rectangular and 3. They were finally inserted in a white envelope which was sealed with glue. Forty of these envelopes were made, twenty for Group A and the other half for Group B, after that, they were mixed in a cardboard box and then enumerated one by one at random until the 40 envelopes were completed. Each envelope was delivered in order of numbering to each of the patients who were entering the treatment. The investigator directed the strengthening program and another Physical Therapist addressed the tests.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physical Therapist and Master´ candidate in Physical Therapist in Sport and Physical Activity
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2019
First Posted
July 8, 2019
Study Start
August 15, 2018
Primary Completion
January 13, 2019
Study Completion
April 13, 2019
Last Updated
November 23, 2021
Results First Posted
November 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators are not yet sure of sharing the IPD (individual participant data) of this study because they want to publish an article first and then decide.