Development and Application of Portable Multisensory Stimulation Device
4 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study to develop the vibroacustic devices, and to compare the effects between vibroacustic device therapy and music therapy in adults with dementia or with neck pain. The immediate effect and long-term training effect would be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2019
CompletedJuly 16, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.5 years
May 30, 2019
July 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the electroencephalographic (EEG) activities ncluding Alpha, Beta, Theta, and Delta signals will be assessed in persons with mild to moderate dementia and healthy subjects.after sensory stimulation. .
The EEG was recorded by EMOTIV EPOC+ mobile headset (Bioinformatics Company, USA). The wireless 14-EEG channels on the skull were located at anterior frontal (AF), frontal (F), frontal central (FC), temporal (T), parietal (P) and occipital (O) areas,The frequency analysis of brain waves includinh Alpha, Beta, Theta, and Delta signals before, during and after sensory stimulation will be recorded and analyzed.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The pressure pain threshold following multisensory stimulation will be assessed around cervical region.
one year
Study Arms (4)
Comparison between unisensory and multisensory stimulation
EXPERIMENTALThe same person receive unisensory and multisensory stimulation on separate day.
The treatment effect of multisensory stimulation
EXPERIMENTALThe persons living in long-term care facility would receive multisensory stimulation for one month.
Multisensory stimulation and virtual reality.
EXPERIMENTALThe subjects would receive vibroacoustic therapy or virtual reality.
Vibroacustic therapy on neck pain.
EXPERIMENTALThe subjects would receive either vibroacustic therapy or music therapy.
Interventions
the participants will receive the vibroacustic device or music therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- mild to moderate Dementia
- age-matched healthy subjects
You may not qualify if:
- can not follow order
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kwan-Hwa Lin
Hualien City, 97004, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Beinert K, Englert V, Taube W. After-effects of neck muscle vibration on sensorimotor function and pain in neck pain patients and healthy controls - a case-control study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Aug;41(16):1906-1913. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1451925. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
PMID: 29558836BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chich-Haung Yang, PhD
Tzu Chi University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2019
First Posted
July 2, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share