NCT03988621

Brief Summary

Informal caregiving is demanding and stressful. Caregivers of adults with heart failure (HF) report significant stress and poor self-care. Health coaching, a support intervention, may relieve stress and promote self-care in HF caregivers. Few studies have tested the cost-effectiveness of support interventions for caregivers. Even less is known about the effect of caregiver support interventions on HF outcomes. We developed and tested a virtual support intervention (ViCCY ("Vicky")-Virtual Caregiver Coach for you), in HF caregivers. Using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, we enrolled informal HF caregivers with poor self-care (Health Self-Care Neglect scale score\>=2), randomizing them 1:1 to an intervention or control group. Both groups received Health Information (HI) delivered through the Internet, but the ViCCY caregiver group also received 10 health coaching support sessions tailored to individual issues. The control group had access to the same HI resources over the same interval, using the same Internet program, but without coaching support. At baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, we collected self-reported data on self-care, stress, coping, and health status. At 6 months, we compared ViCCY to HI alone to assess intervention efficacy using intent-to-treat analysis. A sample of 250 caregivers (125/arm) was enrolled to provide \>90% power to detect significant differences between the groups on the primary outcome of self-care (Aim 1). We collected quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care resource use in caregivers over 12 months to assess cost-effectiveness of ViCCY (Aim 2). To explore the effect of caregiver outcomes on HF patients' outcomes (hospitalization rates, hospital days, mortality rates, QALYs) over a 12-month period (Aim 3) and knowing that not all HF patients would enroll, we consented a subgroup of 93 HF patients cared for by these caregivers to explore the effect of caregiver self-care on patient outcomes. If shown to be efficacious and cost-effective, our virtual health coaching intervention can easily scaled to support millions of caregivers worldwide. This application addresses the NINR strategic plan and is directly responsive to PA-18-150.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
343

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_2 heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2019

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 23, 2019

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 19, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 19, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2019

Results QC Date

May 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Self-careSelf-efficacyHeart FailureStressSupport Systems

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the Health Self-Care Neglect (HSCN) Scale

    The Health Self-Care Neglect (HSCN) scale measures an individual's neglect of self-care behaviors. It consists of 9 yes or no questions. Scores range from 0-9. Higher scores indicating more self-care neglect.

    The primary outcome was analyzed at 6 months (baseline compared to 6 months) but data were collected at 9- and 12-months to assess sustainability.

  • Change in the Self-Care Inventory, Maintenance Scale

    The Self-Care Inventory is a 20 item inventory with 3 embedded scales (self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management). The outcome used in this study was the 8-item Self-Care Maintenance Scale. Responses are added and standardized to range from 0-100. A higher score indicates better self-care.

    The primary outcome was analyzed at 6 months (baseline compared to 6 months) but data were collected at 9- and 12-months to assess sustainability.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Main analysis was Baseline to 6 months. Data will be analyzed at 12 months to determine sustainability of intervention effect.

  • Change in the Ways of Coping Questionnaire

    The primary analysis was at 6 months (baseline compared to 6 months) but data were collected at 9- and 12-months to assess sustainability.

  • Change in Health Status as Measured by the Short Form-36 (Physical and Mental Health Status)

    Main analysis Baseline to 6 months. Sustainability assessed at 12 months.

  • Change in the Caregivers' SF-6D (Short Form Six-dimension) Scores

    Measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; primary analysis baseline to 12 months

  • Difference in Caregivers' Hospital and Provider Events

    Data were collected at Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary analysis was done using the baseline to 12 month period.

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Difference in Patient Hospitalization Rate

    Count of patient hospitalizations that occurred between 6 and 12 months (following the intervention, which ended at 6 months)

  • Patient Hospitalization Days

    Count of patient hospitalization days which occurred between 6 and 12 month timepoints

  • Patient Mortality Rates

    Patient mortality occurring between months 6-12 of the study (following the intervention period)

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Caregivers randomized to the intervention ViCCY received 10 sessions of virtual health coaching by trained health coaches over 6 months with content based on the theoretical framework (the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping) and prior research. In addition, they received the same health information as that provided to the caregivers in the control arm. Sessions were provided through tablets. We helped caregivers gain the knowledge and skills needed to achieve self-identified health goals through self-care using motivational interviewing. We focused on identifying personal values, solving problems, and transforming goals into action. ViCCY was standardized in a treatment manual. Because stress does not affect all people equally, the intervention was tailored to individual appraisals and the factors most likely to influence demand and perceived burden.

Behavioral: ViCCY

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group received Health Information (HI) delivered through the internet.

Interventions

ViCCYBEHAVIORAL

Virtual Caregiver Coach for You

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pennsylvania Hospital Heart and Vascular Clinic

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Riegel B, Quinn R, Hirschman KB, Thomas G, Ashare R, Stawnychy MA, Bowles KH, Aryal S, Wald JW. Health Coaching Improves Outcomes of Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;17(7):e011475. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011475. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

  • Riegel B, Quinn R, Hirschman KB. A longitudinal comparative analysis of sustained benefit of a self-care intervention for caregivers of adults with heart failure. BMC Nurs. 2025 Nov 22;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-04123-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Limitations include enrollment from a single center although the center receives referrals from a diverse northeastern region of the US. Attrition was larger than anticipated and intervention engagement was variable. Although the sample enrolled was predominately White, female, and well-educated, it was large and diverse in many ways with almost 40% from groups who did not identify as White and almost 15% men.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Barbara Riegel, PhD, RN, Professor
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The investigator was blinded to the assignment of participant to the two different arms in the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study was based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Stressful experiences such as caregiving demand - circumstances that give rise to real or perceived stress - are construed as person-environment transactions. Primary appraisal of demand involves assessment of its significance, which results in perceived burden. Secondary appraisal involves assessment of the resources available to cope with it. These appraisals lead to the coping effort. Without successful coping, self-care is poor, which decreases health status in caregivers. The virtual support intervention \[ViCCY ("Vicky") - Virtual Caregiver Coach for You\] addressed both appraisal and coping.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2019

First Posted

June 17, 2019

Study Start

August 23, 2019

Primary Completion

April 19, 2023

Study Completion

October 19, 2023

Last Updated

February 20, 2025

Results First Posted

October 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Plan to share the data internally with doctoral students and post-doctoral trainees instead of sharing the data widely with external sources. Internal sharing will allow our trainees to complete meaningful studies using secondary analysis techniques and to finish their programs in a timely fashion. When all our analyses have been completed we will share the data through a public source.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication of our major trial data, we will share data with Penn trainees.
Access Criteria
The Principal Investigator will personally review requests from students for use of the data. She will approve requests based on the importance of the questions asked. She will personally oversee progress in analysis and the publication of abstracts and articles based on the data.

Locations