STRATA: Safe Testing of Risk for AsymptomaTic MicrohematuriA
Use of a Multiplexed Molecular Biomarker Test Cxbladder, in Real World Decision Making to Provide Clinical Utility Using a Randomized Design ("STRATA Study")
1 other identifier
interventional
554
2 countries
12
Brief Summary
To evaluate the clinical utility associated with the integration of Cxbladder into the evaluation of subjects presenting with hematuria for evaluation of urothelial carcinoma (UC) without compromising detection of UC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2024
CompletedMay 31, 2025
May 1, 2025
4.9 years
April 24, 2019
May 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To measure the change in cystoscopy procedure use count between control and test arms when Cxbladder Triage is used in the evaluation
To evaluate the increase in utility as defined by the reduction in cystoscopy procedure count when Cxbladder is used in the evaluation. The comparison will be made when comparing test and control arms on a per subject basis. The gold standard for determination of a confirmed clinical diagnosis is cystoscopy confirmed by pathology, plus imaging or any follow-up investigations relating to the visit.
The outcome measure will be assessed by 6 months after trial completion.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To measure the change in total procedure use (and the invasive procedure sub-group) count between control and test arms when Cxbladder is used in the evaluation.
The outcome measure will be assessed by 6 months after trial completion.
To measure the number of subjects who were incorrectly diagnosed associated with the integration of Cxbladder into the evaluation of subjects (or sub-cohorts on test and control arms) presenting with hematuria for evaluation of UC
The outcome measure will be assessed by 6 months after trial completion.
To clinically validate the performance characteristics and test negative rate of the Cxbladder Detect+ test.
The outcome measure will be assessed by 6 months after trial completion.
Quantify performance characteristics of Cxbladder signatures including for the detection of high grade/stage UC.
The outcome measure will be assessed by 6 months after trial completion.
Study Arms (2)
Test, subjects categorised as "low risk" or "Not low risk"
ACTIVE COMPARATORA clinical risk factor nomogram risk classification will be used in this study. The nomogram categorizes subjects as either "low risk" or "not low risk" categories. "Low risk" subjects satisfy all conditions and "not low risk" satisfies at least one of the conditions.The Cxbladder Triage test result will be provided to physicians for all "low risk" subjects on the test arm. If a "low risk" subject has a Cxbladder Triage negative test result then the indication is to rule out the subject without further assessment. The decision to rule-out or further evaluate is solely that of the physician and subject. If the "low risk" subjects are not Cxbladder Triage negative then a Cxbladder Detect test result will also be provided. The indication is further evaluation as per standard of care. Subjects categorised as "not low risk" will be evaluated as per standard of care. Note that Cxbladder test results will be available for eventual analysis for these subjects.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects on the control arm will be on standard of care. Trial nomogram clinical risk factor categorization for control arm subjects will not be provided to the physician (but appropriate information will be collected on the CRF to enable sub-group analysis) No Cxbladder test results will be provided for control arm subjects. Note that Cxbladder test results will be available for eventual analysis for these subjects.
Interventions
The Cxbladder Triage test result will be provided to physicians for all "low risk" subjects on the test arm. If a "low risk" subject has a Cxbladder Triage negative test result then the indication is to rule out the subject without further assessment. The decision to rule-out or further evaluate is solely that of the physician and subject. If the "low risk" subjects are not Cxbladder Triage negative then a Cxbladder Detect test result will also be provided. The indication is further evaluation as per standard of care. "Not low risk" patients will be evaluated as per standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is undergoing investigation of recent confirmed hematuria, as defined by the AUA/SUFU Guideline (Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline, J Urol 2020; 204:778) (by either flexible or rigid cystoscopy/TURBT), including hematuria subjects referred due to suspicious/positive imaging, in order to determine the presence of urothelial carcinoma.
- Able to provide a voided urine sample of the required minimum volume
- Able to give written consent
- Able and willing to comply with study requirements
- Aged 18 years or older
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of bladder malignancy or pelvic radiotherapy. Prior history prostate or renal cell carcinoma within the last 5 years.
- Prior genitourinary manipulation (flexible or rigid cystoscopy / catheterisation, urethral dilation) in the 14 days before urine collection,
- Known current pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Institute of Urology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90089, United States
Avant Concierge Urology
Winter Garden, Florida, 34787, United States
Accellacare
Chicago, Illinois, 60515, United States
Allina Health Cancer Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407-3799, United States
University of Minnesota, Department of Urology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Division of urology, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850, United States
Carolina Urologic Research Center
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Department of Urology,Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
UTHSA - Mays Cancer Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
The prostate centre- Diamond Health care centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z1M9, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A5W9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tony Lough, PhD
Pacific Edge Pty Ltd
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2019
First Posted
June 17, 2019
Study Start
September 11, 2019
Primary Completion
July 24, 2024
Study Completion
July 24, 2024
Last Updated
May 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share