NCT03987880

Brief Summary

To assess the improvement in refractive error and the corneal endothelial safety with a customized corneal crosslinking treatment regimen for low grade myopia. The study compares two treatment protocols, a 4.0-mm central ring-shaped zone with a 3.5-mm central ring-shaped zone in high oxygen environment without corneal epithelial debridement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 22, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline in uncorrected visual acuity

    Change from baseline in distance uncorrected visual acuity

    1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

  • Change from baseline in spherical equivalent

    Change from baseline in spherical equivalent on subjective distance refraction

    1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline in corneal endothelial cell density

    12 and 24 months after treatment

  • Change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity

    1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

Study Arms (2)

4.0 mm zone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PiXL treatment with UV irradiation in a central 4.0-mm ring-shaped zone of the cornea. The area consist of three rings with a central 2-mm zone that is left untreated. The energy is higher towards the periphery of the ring-shaped area, reaching its maximum at 2-mm from the corneal centre. Pulsed UV-light, 1s on / 1s off; 30mW. For myopia of less than 0.75D, 10 J/cm2 is used, for higher levels of myopia 15J/cm2 is used.

Procedure: 4.0 mm treatment

3.5 mm zone

EXPERIMENTAL

PiXL treatment with UV irradiation in a central ring-shaped 3.5-mm zone of the cornea, with a central 1.5 mm zone that is left untreated. The illumination area consists of three rings, where the outer and inner ring are thinner than the middle ring. The maximum energy is distributed in the middle ring. Pulsed UV-light, 0.5s on / 1s off; 45mW. For myopia of less than 0.75D, a maximum of 10 J/cm2 is used, for higher levels of myopia a maximum of 15J/cm2 is used.

Procedure: 3.5 mm treatment

Interventions

PiXL treatment with UV irradiation in a central 4.0-mm ring-shaped zone of the cornea.

4.0 mm zone

PiXL treatment with UV irradiation in a central 3.5-mm ring-shaped zone of the cornea.

3.5 mm zone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Spherical equivalent on distance subjective refraction between -0.50D and -2.50D.
  • Astigmatism ≤ 0.75D
  • Stable myopia. Maximum change in refraction of 0.50D in the last 2 years.
  • Best corrected visual acuity of at least 0.00 logMAR (ETDRS chart).
  • Thinnest pachymetry reading ≥ 440 μm.
  • No previous ocular surgery.
  • No cognitive insufficiency interfering with the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of or current condition, disease, surgery or medication with ocular effects that could affect the outcomes of the treatment.
  • Allergy to any substance or device used in the study.
  • Cognitive insufficiency interfering with the informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Umeå University

Umeå, 901 85, Sweden

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaRefractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Interventions

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Anders Behndig, MD, PhD

    Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The participants are not aware which eye will receive the 4.0-mm ring-shaped zone treatment and which eye will receive the 3.5-mm ring-shaped zone treatment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, single-masked intraindividually comparing randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to receive ultraviolet (UV) light according to protocol A in one eye and protocol B in the other, which is masked to the participant. Both eyes will be treated during the same visit. Participants are randomized utilizing a computer list of unique random numbers between 1 and 27; an even number will be treated with the 4.0-mm zone in the right eye; an uneven number with the 4.0-mm zone in the left eye.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Posted

June 17, 2019

Study Start

January 22, 2018

Primary Completion

October 15, 2020

Study Completion

October 15, 2020

Last Updated

December 10, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations