Microbiologic Alterations of the Conjunctiva of Hot Tub-soaking Ophthalmologists
MACHO
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are microbiologic alterations of the ocular surface after hot tub exposure. The study will evaluate the number of microbes before and after hot tub use in order to find out whether hot tub exposure has any change on the organisms present on the ocular surface. Participants will be randomized to dunk or not to dunk their head during their time in the hot tub.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 26, 2020
CompletedSeptember 10, 2020
September 1, 2020
10 months
June 5, 2019
September 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quantity of organisms
Genus-species will be identified for each sample, and quantified with an ordinal scale (0-4). The total of this score will be the quantity for that person-time. The primary analyses will be a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (Mann-Whitney) between the two arms at the follow-up time point (randomized comparison of dunk vs no-dunk), and a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test between pre-hot-tub and post-hot-tub (longitudinal comparison of all cases). We estimate that a total of 20 subjects will provide 80% power to detect a 1.25 SD difference in the total quantity score between randomization arms at the post (f/u) time point. We estimate 80% power to detect a .9 SD difference between pre (baseline) and post (f/u) time points in a paired longitudinal analysis.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Richness (number of species per sample) of organisms found in the conjunctiva with hot tub use (post-test comparison)
1 year
Richness (number of species per sample) of organisms found in the conjunctiva with hot tub use (pre versus post)
1 year
Difference in organism profile with hot tub use (pre versus post)
1 year
Difference in organism profile with hot tub use (between arms)
1 year
Quantity comparing pre-hot tub and post-hot tub swabs
1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Head Dunk
EXPERIMENTALSubjects who are assigned to be in this arm are asked to sit in a hot tub for 15 minutes and instructed to submerge his or her head in the hot tub at least once and at least up to the eyebrows during his or her time in the hot tub.
No Head Dunk
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects assigned to this arm are asked to sit in a hot tub for 15 minutes but to keep his or her chin above water during the entire time.
Interventions
If randomized to "Dunk," the subject is asked to submerge his or her head in the hot tub at least up to brow level.
Subjects will be asked to sit in a hot tub for 15 minutes (with an individual timer).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- greater of 18 years of age
- a willing participant
- healthy
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- high or low blood pressure
- active diarrhea
- lymphedema
- heart disease
- seizure disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94122, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gerami D Seitzman, MD
UCSF/Proctor Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A provider is assigned to perform conjunctival swabs; this person is completely masked to exposure. The culture plates, which are randomized, are sent to a microbiology lab and the technicians are completely masked to exposures when reading the plates.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2019
First Posted
June 14, 2019
Study Start
May 27, 2019
Primary Completion
March 26, 2020
Study Completion
March 26, 2020
Last Updated
September 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share