NCT03981809

Brief Summary

Development and internal validation of an easy-to-use tool for clinical pain assessment. The tool has to be applicable in any clinical practice and without the need for expensive and complicated hospital tools to identify the source of persistent pain after the treatment of cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2019

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 13, 2019

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 21, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

PainCancerChronic painPersistent pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (16)

  • Douleur Neuropathic 4 questions (DN4) questionnaire

    Neuropathic pain: pain that arises from a damaged nerve is assessed with a questionnaire (1)

    2 minutes

  • Quantitative sensory testing

    Neuropathic pain: pain that arises from a damaged nerve is assessed by measuring thermal thresholds (2)

    20 minutes

  • Pain mapping

    Neuropathic pain: pain that arises from a damaged nerve is assessed by painting affected areas on a body chart (3)

    1 minute

  • Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) questionnaire

    Central sensitization pain: pain caused by changes in the central nervous system is assessed with a questionnaire (1)

    5 minutes

  • Conditioned pain modulation

    Central sensitization pain: pain caused by changes in the central nervous system is assessed with a thermal test (2)

    10 minutes

  • Temporal summation

    Central sensitization pain: pain caused by changes in the central nervous system is assessed with a series of touch stimuli (3)

    2,5 minutes

  • Diffuse pain

    Central sensitization pain: pain caused by changes in the central nervous system is assessed by painting affected areas on a body chart (4)

    0,5 minute

  • Manual palpation

    Central sensitization pain: pain caused by changes in the central nervous system is assessed by applying pressure with manual palpation (5)

    3 minutes

  • Evaluation of skin

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by visual evaluation of the skin condition (1)

    20 seconds

  • Lymphedema

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by examining the presence of lymphedema by measuring the circumference of the arm (2)

    4 minutes

  • Joint pain

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by examining if several joints are sore, especially in the morning (3)

    30 seconds

  • Active mobility

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by examining the movements the patient can perform (4)

    2,5 minutes

  • Passive mobility

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by examining the movements the clinician can perform on the patient (5)

    3,5 minutes

  • Strength

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by the strength the patient can perform in a specific movement (6)

    1,5 minutes

  • Scar tissue

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by examining the elasticity of the scar tissue by manual palpation of the clinician (7)

    2 minutes

  • Axillary web syndrome

    Nociceptive pain: pain that arises from a damaged tissue is assessed by visually examining the presence of lymph cords in the axilla (8)

    2 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Pain catastrophizing scale

    6 minutes

  • Depression, anxiety and stress

    7 minutes

  • Pain Self-efficacy and Expectations: questionnaire

    5 minutes

  • Pain character: questionnaire

    4 minutes

  • Pain disability: Pain Disability Index

    3 minutes

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

Easy-to-use screening tool to identify the dominant pain mechanism by using quick clinical tests and compare their accuracy and validity with complicated reference tests.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Cancer patients older than 18, in complete remission, who experience pain scored with a minimum of 3/10 (0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain imaginable). The patients do not have metastasis and are not in a palliative status, nor are they pregnant or diagnosed with a cancer type other than breast, prostate, lung/bronchus, colon/rectum or gynecologic cancer.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient treated for primary cancer: breast, prostate, lung/bronchus, colon/rectum, gynecologic (uterus or ovary)
  • Complete remission
  • Curative treatment finished
  • Ongoing hormonal and targeted treatment permitted
  • Patient experiences pain (NRS minimum 3/10 during the past week)

You may not qualify if:

  • Active metastasis
  • Palliative status
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Leuven

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cancer PainPainNeoplasmsChronic Pain

Interventions

Diagnostic Tests, Routine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Nele Devoogdt, Prof.

    UZ Leuven

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator An De Groef

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2019

First Posted

June 11, 2019

Study Start

June 13, 2019

Primary Completion

December 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 30, 2022

Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations