NCT03978286

Brief Summary

Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes is often undiagnosed and remains untreated, leading to poor therapy adherence and ill health-related outcomes. The aim of study was evaluated the effect of vortioxetine versus sertraline in the treatment of depression, diabetes-related distress and control metabolic in subjects with type 2 diabetes and depression. was included patients who were glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 7.5%, 18 to 60 years of age and written consent . Pharmacological treatment for depression was assigned randomly: vortioxetine (10 mg/day) or sertraline (75 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Biochemical parameters, anthropometric measures and depression symptoms were evaluated before and at the and at the 8 weeks after antidepressant treatment.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 30, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 13, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 11, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

depressionType 2 diabetes Mellitusvortioxetinesertraline

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in remission of depression in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The assessment of depression was performed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) validated in the Spanish version. We used a 17-item reduced version, the range of scale was 0-50, includes the following items: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. A score of 8 and above indicates depression and a high levels of anxiety symptoms. Where 14 was the cutoff point of this scale; patients with this score were diagnosed with major depression and included in the study. Depression was screened using HAM-D at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in severity of depression in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The severity of depression was measured with the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale revised in Spanish (CES-DR35). Previous studies in a Mexican population reported a Cronbach α score of 0.9. This questionnaire consists of 35 items, the range of scale was 0-140, among them are: depressed mood, anhedonia, appetite, sleep problem, psychomotor retardation, fatigue, guilt/conscience, thinking, suicidal ideation and social. A score of 16 and above indicates clinically significant symptoms of major depression episode and the severity of depression. Depression was screened using CES-DR35 at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in treatment of diabetes related stress in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. Diabetes related stress was screened using 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5). The scale gives a total score from 0 to 20. A score of 8 and above indicates a high level of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes related stress was screened using PAID-5 at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in fasting plasma glucose level in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The glycemic variable was measured by fasting plasma glucose level in mg/dl. at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in glycemic control in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The glycemic variable was measured by glycosylated hemoglobin A 1c in percentage at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in cholesterol control in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The metabolic variable was measured by cholesterol in mg/dL at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in triglycerides control in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    Two groups of depressed type 2 diabetic patients were involve in the study: one group received sertraline and the second vortioxetine. The metabolic variable was measured by triglycerides in mg/dL at the beginning of the study and at 8 weeks of treatment. Finally the effect of both antidepressant were compared.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in weigh in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in waist circumference in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    8 weeks

  • Effect of antidepressant treatment (sertraline versus vortioxetine) in anthropometric variables in depressed type 2 diabetic patients.

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Vortioxetine therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

patients who gave informed consent and met the inclusion criteria were attended by a psychiatrist. The pharmacological management were randomly assigned: these group of patients received vortioxetine (10 mg/day) for 8 weeks, in addition, the patients maintained their anti-diabetic treatment (oral hypoglycemic or insulin)

Drug: Vortioxetine

Sertraline therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

patients who gave informed consent and met the inclusion criteria were attended by a psychiatrist. The pharmacological management were randomly assigned: these group of patients received sertraline (75 mg / day) for 8 weeks, in addition, the patients maintained their anti-diabetic treatment (oral hypoglycemic or insulin)

Drug: Sertraline

Interventions

10 mg per day

Also known as: Brintellix
Vortioxetine therapy

75 mg per day

Also known as: zoloft
Sertraline therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals had to be between 18 and 85 years of age
  • Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the American Diabetes Association criteria,
  • They had to receive anti-diabetic treatment, Clinical diagnosis of major depressive episode according Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, five edition (DSM-V)
  • Ratings scale score ≥ 14 by means of Hamilton Depression scale (HAM-D)
  • Patients had to give verbal and written informed consent for this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological illness
  • Psychoactive medications
  • Type I diabetes
  • Active suicidal ideation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Petrak F, Herpertz S, Albus C, Hermanns N, Hiemke C, Hiller W, Kronfeld K, Kruse J, Kulzer B, Ruckes C, Zahn D, Muller MJ. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Sertraline in Patients With Depression and Poorly Controlled Diabetes: The Diabetes and Depression (DAD) Study: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 May;38(5):767-75. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1599. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

    PMID: 25690005BACKGROUND
  • Rachdi C, Damak R, Fekih Romdhane F, Ouertani H, Cheour M. Impact of sertraline on weight, waist circumference and glycemic control: A prospective clinical trial on depressive diabetic type 2 patients. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Feb;13(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

    PMID: 30287230BACKGROUND
  • D'Agostino A, English CD, Rey JA. Vortioxetine (brintellix): a new serotonergic antidepressant. P T. 2015 Jan;40(1):36-40.

    PMID: 25628505BACKGROUND
  • Chokka P, Bougie J, Rampakakis E, Proulx J. Assessment in Work Productivity and the Relationship with Cognitive Symptoms (AtWoRC): primary analysis from a Canadian open-label study of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). CNS Spectr. 2019 Jun;24(3):338-347. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918000913. Epub 2018 May 24.

    PMID: 29792585BACKGROUND
  • Kesim M, Tiryaki A, Kadioglu M, Muci E, Kalyoncu NI, Yaris E. The effects of sertraline on blood lipids, glucose, insulin and HBA1C levels: A prospective clinical trial on depressive patients. J Res Med Sci. 2011 Dec;16(12):1525-31.

    PMID: 22973359BACKGROUND
  • Llorca PM, Lancon C, Brignone M, Rive B, Salah S, Ereshefsky L, Francois C. Relative efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus selected antidepressants by indirect comparisons of similar clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2589-606. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.969566. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

    PMID: 25249164BACKGROUND
  • Petrak F, Baumeister H, Skinner TC, Brown A, Holt RIG. Depression and diabetes: treatment and health-care delivery. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Jun;3(6):472-485. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00045-5. Epub 2015 May 17.

    PMID: 25995125BACKGROUND
  • Rosenblat JD, Kakar R, McIntyre RS. The Cognitive Effects of Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jul 25;19(2):pyv082. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv082.

    PMID: 26209859BACKGROUND
  • Tovilla-Zarate CA, Perez-Mandujano A, Ramirez-Gonzalez IR, Fresan A, Suarez-Mendez S, Martinez-Villasenor E, Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Villar-Soto M, Lopez-Narvaez ML, Gonzalez-Castro TB, Ble-Castillo JL, Juarez-Rojop IE. Vortioxetine versus sertraline in metabolic control, distress and depression in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Nov;7(22):656. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.56.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

VortioxetineSertraline

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorDiabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds1-NaphthylamineAminesOrganic ChemicalsNaphthalenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Isela Juarez Rojop, Ph.D

    Universidad Juárez Autonoma de Tabasco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2019

First Posted

June 7, 2019

Study Start

June 30, 2016

Primary Completion

June 30, 2017

Study Completion

June 30, 2018

Last Updated

June 13, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

the information will be available when contacting the correspondence author

Shared Documents
SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Once the article is published, information about the study will be available for a period of 3 years.
Access Criteria
direct contact with the correspondence author