Effects of Two Different Dry-Needling Techniques for Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although dry-needling with or without manipulation has shown to be a useful technique to reduce pain in patients with low back pain (LBP), it is unclear which of these two dry-needling techniques would have a greater effect on the lumboscaral multifidus (LM) muscle activation, which is essential in LBP rehabilitation. Therefore, the purposes of the study are: 1) to investigate whether or not dry-needling would change muscle activity of the LM muscles in asymptomatic healthy adults and in individuals with LBP, respectively, and 2) to compare the effects of two dry-needling techniques on LM muscle activation and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic healthy adults and individuals with LBP, respectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedMay 31, 2019
May 1, 2019
2.3 years
September 22, 2017
May 30, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change of Muscle activity
An electroencephalographic (EMG) system with 4 wireless surface electrodes will be used to obtain muscle activities of the right and left lumbar multifidus muscles at the L5 and S2 levels.
Before intervention, immediately after intervention and one week after intervention
Change of Pressure pain threshold
A hand-held computerized pressure algometer will be used to determine the pressure pain threshold on the same 4 sites of EMG recording.
Before intervention, immediately after intervention and one week after intervention
Study Arms (2)
Needle Manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant will receive dry needling intervention with manipulation.
In Situ
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant will receive dry needling intervention without manipulation.
Interventions
For the needle manipulation technique, the needle will be pulled in and out (sparrow pecking) and redirected in small angles (coning) for 5-10 seconds. For the in situ technique, the needles will stay (in situ) in the left and right lumbar multifidus muscles for 10 minutes after the insertion of the needle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking adults and are 18 years of age or older.
- For asymptomatic healthy adults: no existing low back pain (LBP) and no LBP in the past 6 months.
- For individuals with LBP: existing LBP near the L5-S1 level with an average pain intensity score ≥ 2/10 in the past 24 hours (numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain)
You may not qualify if:
- Bleeding disorders (e.g. hemophilia)
- Use of anti-coagulants (e.g. Coumadin)
- Previous low back surgery, systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
- Cancer of the lower quadrant,
- Neurological disorders
- Allergic reaction to adhesive tape
- Inability to obtain testing positions (prone lying)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Texas Woman's University
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Related Publications (1)
Wang-Price S, Zafereo J, Couch Z, Brizzolara K, Heins T, Smith L. Short-term effects of two deep dry needling techniques on pressure pain thresholds and electromyographic amplitude of the lumbosacral multifidus in patients with low back pain - a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Dec;28(5):254-265. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1714165. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
PMID: 31960773DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharon Wang-Price
Texas Woman's University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2017
First Posted
May 31, 2019
Study Start
September 22, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
May 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share