Comparison of Dry Needling and Sustained Pressure in Para-spinal Muscles Trigger Points
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effect of dry needling and sustained pressure in the lumbar Paraspinal trigger points in terms of pain threshold and muscle length. There will be two groups ; experimental and control. Half of study group will receive dry needling session along with stretching and strengthening exercises and half of study group will receive sustained pressure technique along with stretching and strengthening exercises .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2019
CompletedAugust 2, 2019
August 1, 2019
3 months
July 30, 2019
August 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Changes from the base line, The Oswestry Disability Index is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools.At the end score is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total (50) multiplied by 100.As one question(section 8) was dropped in all participants ,so total score was considered as 45 instead of 50.
up to 2 weeks
Para-spinal muscle length
Changes from the base line, Muscle length assessment technique is use to measure available range of muscle. In paraspinal muscles length assessment patient would be sitting position. Palpate anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) bilaterally and instruct the patient to flex forward producing posterior pelvic tilt. Feel when ASIS starts to move this is the end of thoracolumbar flexion and initiation of posterior pelvic tilt. , Patient forehead would come 10 inches of the knees normally.
up to 2 weeks
Visual analog scale
Changes from the base line, The visual analogue scale is one dimensional measure of pain intensity in adults inclusive those with chronic pain. The intensity of pain experienced by the patients on this scale range from no pain (score 0) to very severe pain (score 100). It is marked by paper and pencil on a line consist of horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) comprised of 10centimeters (100mm) in length.
up to 2 weeks
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT).
Changes from the base line, Algometer is a device used to recognize the minimum pressure or force which induce pain pressure threshold (PPT). It is uncomplicated portable tool with a spring install in it. Peak force or pressure provided by this device is kilopond (kp) = 10 N, Newton = 100 kilopascal (kPa).
up to 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Dry Needling
EXPERIMENTALDry needling (04 Sessions) and exercises
Sustain Pressure
ACTIVE COMPARATORsustained pressure and Exercises
Interventions
stretching exercises :single knee to chest (15 reps x 3 sets) double knee to chest(15 reps x 3 sets) strengthening exercises: extension exercises (15 reps x 3 sets)
Sustain Pressure (Number of repetition and hold according to trigger point chronic level) \+ Hot pack 10 to 15 minutes + Active muscle stretching exercise (10 repetition twice daily)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 20-50.
- Patient of acute, sub acute, chronic Low back pain (LBP), Mechanical Low back pain (MLBP) and radiculopathies up to one year.
- Patients having active (spontaneously painful) or latent (requiring palpation to reproduce the characteristic pain) MTrPs.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that were using any medication to reduce the pain and/or have any effect in the skeletal muscle including analgesics, anticoagulants and muscular relaxants.
- Taking other treatment in the same period of the research.
- Pregnant female.
- Patients with Chronic Disease (kidney disease, Diabetic, and osteoporosis) and spinal diseases (herniated disc, spondylolisthesis) will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Bron C, Dommerholt JD. Etiology of myofascial trigger points. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Oct;16(5):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0289-4.
PMID: 22836591BACKGROUNDFernandez-de-las-Penas C, Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points: peripheral or central phenomenon? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):395. doi: 10.1007/s11926-013-0395-2.
PMID: 24264721BACKGROUNDKalichman L, Vulfsons S. Dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):640-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090296.
PMID: 20823359BACKGROUNDBishwajit G, Tang S, Yaya S, Feng Z. Participation in physical activity and back pain among an elderly population in South Asia. J Pain Res. 2017 Apr 15;10:905-913. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S133013. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28450787BACKGROUNDKoppenhaver SL, Walker MJ, Su J, McGowen JM, Umlauf L, Harris KD, Ross MD. Changes in lumbar multifidus muscle function and nociceptive sensitivity in low back pain patient responders versus non-responders after dry needling treatment. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
PMID: 25801100BACKGROUNDUemoto L, Nascimento de Azevedo R, Almeida Alfaya T, Nunes Jardim Reis R, Depes de Gouvea CV, Cavalcanti Garcia MA. Myofascial trigger point therapy: laser therapy and dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Sep;17(9):357. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0357-4.
PMID: 23904202BACKGROUNDDesai MJ, Bean MC, Heckman TW, Jayaseelan D, Moats N, Nava A. Treatment of myofascial pain. Pain Manag. 2013 Jan;3(1):67-79. doi: 10.2217/pmt.12.78.
PMID: 24645933BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Ghafoor Sajjad, PhD*
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- this study is randomized control trail, participants are randomly allocated through sealed envelope method
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2019
First Posted
August 2, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
May 30, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
August 2, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share