Comparing Dry Needling to Manual Therapy for Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Use of Dry Needling to Manual Therapy for Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a comparative study to determine if there is a difference in pain reduction and disability between dry needling and manual therapy for patients with low back pain. Subjects will be seen two times per week for 3 weeks (6 visits) and will receive either dry needling or manual mobilizations along with patient education and a home exercise program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Dec 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 17, 2018
September 1, 2018
3.7 years
November 24, 2014
September 13, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index (change over time)
The ODI is a ten question self report measure that assesses the impact of the patient's pain on their ability to perform everyday activities and is currently considered the gold standard for measuring degree of disability and estimating quality of life in a person with low back pain.
The ODI will be recorded at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, and discharge/3 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (change over time)
The NPRS will be recorded at baseline, immediately following treatment, at 1 week, 2 weeks, and discharge/3 weeks.
Pain pressure threshold (change over time)
The NPRS will be recorded at baseline, immediately following treatment, at 1 week, 2 weeks, and discharge/3 weeks.
Percentage of recovery (one time assessment at the end of the 3 weeks)
3 weeks or Discharge
Patient Specific Functional Scale Score
PSFS score collected at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks or discharge
Study Arms (2)
Dry Needling
EXPERIMENTALA total of 30 subjects will be randomized to this experimental arm. If randomized to this arm, subjects will receive dry needling, patient education, and a home exercise program.
Manual Therapy
EXPERIMENTALA total of 30 subjects will be randomized to this experimental arm. If randomized to this arm, subjects will receive manual therapy, patient education, and a home exercise program.
Interventions
The therapist will locate the involved segment using passive accessory intervertebral movements. The segment will be localized to the level, which provokes the patient's symptoms most easily, and this segment will be determined to be the involved level. Once this level has been identified, the therapist will compare central glides over the spinous process or a unilateral glide over the facet joint to determine which is more provocative. Whichever is most provocative will be the location of the treatment. The therapist will provide 3 bouts lasting 45 seconds just easing into the patient's symptoms at the most provocative level with approximately 45 seconds rest between each bout.
Dry needling involves inserting a dry, mono-filament needle through the skin and into an area of symptomatic soft tissue. The two-inch needles will be placed segmentally and into the lower extremities following peripheral nerve patterning by the treating physical therapist. Following initial penetration into the skin over the tender area, the therapist carefully advances the needle into the tissue below the skin. After the needle has reached the desired depth, the therapist will insert the subsequent needles. Needles will be placed along the segmental levels of the lumbar spine above and below the tender area identified and into the lower extremity in areas that correlate with a peripheral nerve map. Needles will remain in the tissue for up to 5 minutes, removed, and appropriately disposed of.
A home exercise program will be given to each subject to be completed in the clinic and at home 1x/day. The exercises will consist of active range of motion exercises and core stabilization exercises. The program is standardized for all subjects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- There will be 72 subjects participating in this study that present with mechanical low back pain, ranging from 18-70 years old. The 72 subjects includes a 20% attrition rate 12 additional subjects. The total needed for analysis is 60 subjects, 30 per group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Youngstown state university
Youngstown, Ohio, 44406, United States
Related Publications (3)
Furlan AD, van Tulder M, Cherkin D, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes B, Berman B. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):944-63. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158941.21571.01.
PMID: 15834340BACKGROUNDZiaeifar M, Arab AM, Karimi N, Nourbakhsh MR. The effect of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and disability in patients with a myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
PMID: 24725800BACKGROUNDCook C, Learman K, Showalter C, Kabbaz V, O'Halloran B. Early use of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust manipulation: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther. 2013 Jun;18(3):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PMID: 23040656BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ken Learman, PhD
Faculty
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W Griswold, Doctorate
Faculty
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2014
First Posted
December 9, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09