NCT03954028

Brief Summary

The study team proposes to prospectively compare the healing outcomes of autogenous soft tissue connective tissue graft (CTG) and Acellular dermis matrix (ADM) in a split-mouth design study for patients requiring modification of gingival soft tissue biotype. The researchers aim to investigate the earlier phase of graft healing after the grafting surgery by biopsy histology and by examining the alteration of gene profile during the healing of gingival tissue healing by molecular cell biological techniques.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2019

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The histological analysis of the gingival biopsy tissue.

    Histological analysis with standard coloration will assess the epithelium and underneath connective tissue within the gingival biopsy tissue. Signs of inflammation (ulcerations, infiltration of neutrophil cells, vessel structure) will be noted.

    Month 3---after the gingival biopsy procedures

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The immunohistological analysis of the gingival biopsy.

    Month 3---after the gingival biopsy procedures

  • RT-qPCR analysis of gingival biopsy.

    Month 3---after the gingival biopsy procedures

Other Outcomes (2)

  • change in the gingival biotype analysis before and after grafting surgery

    Baseline; Month 3 (before the gingival grafting surgery and before the gingival biopsy which is 3 months after gingival grafting surgery)

  • The healing time of the gingival biopsy sites

    Up to 7 days after gingival biopsy

Study Arms (2)

CTG Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients needing gingival soft tissue augmentation will receive two kinds of gingival tissue graft material in a split-mouth design. In this group, the autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) material will be randomized to transplant to one side of the arch.

Procedure: Gingival Punch Biopsy after healing of Gingival Soft Tissue Augmentation

ADM Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients needing gingival soft tissue augmentation will receive two kinds of gingival tissue graft material in a split-mouth design. In this group, the commercial acellular dermal matrix (ADM) materials will be transplanted to the opposite side of the arch with CTG transplants.

Procedure: Gingival Punch Biopsy after healing of Gingival Soft Tissue Augmentation

Interventions

Patients needing gingival soft tissue augmentation will receive two kinds of gingival tissue graft material in a split-mouth design. The autogenous connective tissue (CTG) graft material will be randomized to apply to one half, and commercial acellular dermal matrix (ADM) materials will be used in the opposite half. After 3 months of healing, a gingival punch biopsy will be performed in both sides to collect the tissues for analysis.

ADM GroupCTG Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • general healthy
  • periodontal healthy (no PD \>3mm, no BOP, no mobility at the test site and control site)
  • patients identified need gingival biotype modification (need for increased tissue thickness) during the periodontal exam or referred from orthodontics

You may not qualify if:

  • current smoker or smoking history
  • taking Antibiotics or medicines within the last 3 months
  • past history of gingival soft tissue augmentation/modification surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1333-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130692. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

    PMID: 24597764BACKGROUND
  • Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005 Feb;76(2):178-86. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.178.

    PMID: 15974840BACKGROUND
  • de Resende DRB, Greghi SLA, Siqueira AF, Benfatti CAM, Damante CA, Ragghianti Zangrando MS. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2470-6. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

    PMID: 29713889BACKGROUND
  • Menceva Z, Dimitrovski O, Popovska M, Spasovski S, Spirov V, Petrushevska G. Free Gingival Graft versus Mucograft: Histological Evaluation. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Mar 27;6(4):675-679. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.127. eCollection 2018 Apr 15.

    PMID: 29731940BACKGROUND
  • Wei PC, Laurell L, Lingen MW, Geivelis M. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 2. A histological comparative study. J Periodontol. 2002 Mar;73(3):257-65. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.257.

    PMID: 11922254BACKGROUND
  • Perotto S, Romano F, Cricenti L, Gotti S, Aimetti M. Vascularization and Innervation of Connective Tissue Grafts in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: A Histologic and Immunohistochemical Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;37(4):551-558. doi: 10.11607/prd.3020.

    PMID: 28609502BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Study Officials

  • Jia Chang, DDS, MS, PhD

    University of Florida College of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The biopsy sites will be coded alphanumerically. The investigator performing the gingival grafts will be different from the examiner performing the gingival biopsies. The examiner performing the gingival biopsies will be blinded to the grafting type source of the biopsy sites.The results from coded samples will be reported to the PI, who will summarize the data.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients needing gingival soft tissue augmentation will receive two kinds of gingival tissue graft material in a split-mouth design. The autogenous connective tissue (CTG) graft material will be randomized to apply to one half, and commercial acellular dermal matrix (ADM) materials will be used in the opposite half.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2019

First Posted

May 17, 2019

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

April 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The individual participant data sets are to be shared include all collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The data will be available once the summary data are published.
Access Criteria
The PI will review requests and criteria for reviewing requests.