Cor Adv Flap Plus Ac Derm Matrix in Thin Phenotype Multiple Recessions
Coronally Advanced Flap and Envelope Type of Flap Plus Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft for the Treatment of Thin Phenotype Multiple Recession Defects
1 other identifier
interventional
22
4 countries
4
Brief Summary
Clinical evaluation of conventional and modified coronally advanced flaps combined with acellular dermal matrix graft
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2019
CompletedMarch 27, 2019
March 1, 2019
1 year
March 17, 2019
March 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Complete root coverage
Complete defect coverage was calculated as the percentage of patients with defects having complete coverage achieved as the gingival margin at cemento-enamel junction or coronal level.
12 months
Root coverage esthetic score
Root coverage esthetic score (RES) was used as a scoring system to assess the esthetic outcomes following root coverage procedures on Miller Class I \& II gingival recession defects through the evaluation of clinical cases. Gingival margin level, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment and gingival color were evaluated without magnification. Zero, 3 and 6 points were used for the evaluation of the position of the gingival margin, whereas a score 0 or 1 point was used for each of the other variables.
12 months
Patient satisfaction score
Each patient was questioned about his/her satisfaction with regard to the following patient-centered criteria: Root coverage attained, relief from dentinal hypersensitivity, color of gums, shape and contour of gums, surgical procedure in terms of pain during surgery and the discomfort experienced related to the duration of the procedure and handling by the operator, post surgical phase in terms of the pain, swelling, and postoperative complications; and cost effectiveness in terms of the time and money spent for the treatment. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a three-point rating scale: fully satisfied (3 points); satisfied (2 points); and unsatisfied (1 point).
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Plaque Index
12 months
Gingival Index
12 months
Bleeding on Probing
12 months
Probing Depth
12 months
Clinical Attachment Level
12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn CAF group, after local anesthesia oblique beveled vertical incisions were made at the most mesial and distal line angles of the recessions. These two incisions were connected with an intra-sulcular and interdental sub-marginal incisions in order to create the external surgical papillae. Then the flap was elevated as a split-full-split approach. The apical portion of the flap was reflected as close to the periosteum as possible by mesio-distal and apical sharp dissection parallel to the mucosa to release residual muscle tension and extended beyond the muco-gingival junction to facilitate the passive coronal replacement of the flap over the defects. In both groups ADMG was used as a sub-epithelial graft considering the manufacturer's instructions. The graft was positioned at the level of cemento-enamel junction and extended to the surrounding bone in the apical direction with full closure of the exposed root surfaces.
Modified coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graft
EXPERIMENTALTest group received CAF avoiding vertical releasing incisions (mCAF).
Interventions
Evaluation of the effectiveness of vertical incisions in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Miller Class I\&II ≥3 mm) treated with coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal matrix graft
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy patients
- Miller Class I \& II multiple buccal recession defects ≥ 3 mm on maxillary incisors, canines or premolars
- Esthetic indication for root coverage
- Probing depth \< 3mm at the recession sites
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Pregnancy
- Bruxism and occlusal trauma
- Previous root coverage procedure
- Endodontically treated teeth at the recession sites
- Caries or restorations at the recession sites
- Use of antibiotics over the previous 3 months prior to treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctorslead
- Altinbas Universitycollaborator
- Universidade Ibirapueracollaborator
- Universidad El Bosque, Bogotácollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors
Baku, Azerbaijan
Ibirapuera University
São Paulo, Brazil
El Bosque University
Bogotá, Colombia
Altinbas University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cavid Ahmedbeyli, PhD
Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- A computer program was used to randomize 22 volunteers to treatment groups by a person who was not involved in the study. The result of this randomization process was written on a paper and then put in the sealed opaque envelope by a blinded examiner, in which the treatment procedure for the specific patient was defined. The envelope was opened by surgeon, immediately before starting the surgical procedure.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2019
First Posted
March 20, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 15, 2015
Last Updated
March 27, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share