NCT03883438

Brief Summary

Clinical evaluation of conventional and modified coronally advanced flaps combined with acellular dermal matrix graft

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Geographic Reach
4 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2015

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 17, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 17, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Gingival recessionTherapySurgeryTooth rootSurgical flapsAcellular dermis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Complete root coverage

    Complete defect coverage was calculated as the percentage of patients with defects having complete coverage achieved as the gingival margin at cemento-enamel junction or coronal level.

    12 months

  • Root coverage esthetic score

    Root coverage esthetic score (RES) was used as a scoring system to assess the esthetic outcomes following root coverage procedures on Miller Class I \& II gingival recession defects through the evaluation of clinical cases. Gingival margin level, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment and gingival color were evaluated without magnification. Zero, 3 and 6 points were used for the evaluation of the position of the gingival margin, whereas a score 0 or 1 point was used for each of the other variables.

    12 months

  • Patient satisfaction score

    Each patient was questioned about his/her satisfaction with regard to the following patient-centered criteria: Root coverage attained, relief from dentinal hypersensitivity, color of gums, shape and contour of gums, surgical procedure in terms of pain during surgery and the discomfort experienced related to the duration of the procedure and handling by the operator, post surgical phase in terms of the pain, swelling, and postoperative complications; and cost effectiveness in terms of the time and money spent for the treatment. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a three-point rating scale: fully satisfied (3 points); satisfied (2 points); and unsatisfied (1 point).

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Plaque Index

    12 months

  • Gingival Index

    12 months

  • Bleeding on Probing

    12 months

  • Probing Depth

    12 months

  • Clinical Attachment Level

    12 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In CAF group, after local anesthesia oblique beveled vertical incisions were made at the most mesial and distal line angles of the recessions. These two incisions were connected with an intra-sulcular and interdental sub-marginal incisions in order to create the external surgical papillae. Then the flap was elevated as a split-full-split approach. The apical portion of the flap was reflected as close to the periosteum as possible by mesio-distal and apical sharp dissection parallel to the mucosa to release residual muscle tension and extended beyond the muco-gingival junction to facilitate the passive coronal replacement of the flap over the defects. In both groups ADMG was used as a sub-epithelial graft considering the manufacturer's instructions. The graft was positioned at the level of cemento-enamel junction and extended to the surrounding bone in the apical direction with full closure of the exposed root surfaces.

Procedure: Modified coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal matrix graft

Modified coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graft

EXPERIMENTAL

Test group received CAF avoiding vertical releasing incisions (mCAF).

Procedure: Modified coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal matrix graft

Interventions

Evaluation of the effectiveness of vertical incisions in the management of multiple gingival recessions (Miller Class I\&II ≥3 mm) treated with coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal matrix graft

Coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graftModified coronally advanced flap and acellular dermal graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemically healthy patients
  • Miller Class I \& II multiple buccal recession defects ≥ 3 mm on maxillary incisors, canines or premolars
  • Esthetic indication for root coverage
  • Probing depth \< 3mm at the recession sites

You may not qualify if:

  • Smokers
  • Pregnancy
  • Bruxism and occlusal trauma
  • Previous root coverage procedure
  • Endodontically treated teeth at the recession sites
  • Caries or restorations at the recession sites
  • Use of antibiotics over the previous 3 months prior to treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors

Baku, Azerbaijan

Location

Ibirapuera University

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

El Bosque University

Bogotá, Colombia

Location

Altinbas University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Study Officials

  • Cavid Ahmedbeyli, PhD

    Aziz Aliyev Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
A computer program was used to randomize 22 volunteers to treatment groups by a person who was not involved in the study. The result of this randomization process was written on a paper and then put in the sealed opaque envelope by a blinded examiner, in which the treatment procedure for the specific patient was defined. The envelope was opened by surgeon, immediately before starting the surgical procedure.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A total of 22 patients with 55 recessions were included in this single blind randomized controlled trial. Each patient had at least two recessions with a depth of ≥ 3 mm (Miller Class I\&II) in the upper jaw. The entry criteria were esthetic indication for root coverage; absence of caries or restorations at the selected sites; no history of previous mucogingival therapy; being a non-smoker and a systemically healthy patient.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2019

First Posted

March 20, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2015

Study Completion

February 15, 2015

Last Updated

March 27, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations