Bupivacaine in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain of Impacted Third Molar Extraction
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The third molars are the teeth that are most frequently included and impacted, extraction is one of the most performed treatments by maxillofacial surgeons in their clinical practice. Its surgical extraction is accompanied by an inflammatory process, which generates pain, edema and trismus. The use of alternatives that offer prolonged analgesia, like the use of bupivacaine, reduce the pain of the patient after an extraction of third molars, allows the reduction of morbidity and the rapid return to daily activities. In addition, it allows a better experience in the dental consultation. Investigators hypothesis is: Irrigation of the alveolus with 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine is effective for the reduction of post-operative pain in extraction of impacted lower third molars
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedMay 18, 2020
May 1, 2020
7 months
May 9, 2019
May 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Intensity Measure: pain visual analog scale
To identify the analgesia obtained with the alveolus irrigation with bupivacaine at 4, 12 and 24 postoperative hours, by applying the analogous visual pain scale in each third molar object of study. Postoperative pain will be evaluated at 4, 12 and 24 hours after surgery, using the Likert pain visual analog scale from 1 to 10. There being 1 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.
4, 12 and 24 postoperative hours
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine solution
EXPERIMENTALIn all patients, both impacted lower third molars are surgically removed in one session, beginning the extractions in the right side. Subsequently, one of the alveolus will be irrigated with 4ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline vasoconstrictor 1: 200,000 (BUPIROP® 0.5% ROPSOHN THERAPEUTICS SAS), the contralateral alveolus will be irrigated with 4 ml of saline solution 0.9% (Baxter laboratories) prior to the placement of the suture for the closure of the surgical wound, using the aspiration to avoid the exit of the medication out of the alveolus.
Saline solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn all patients, both impacted lower third molars are surgically removed in one session, beginning the extractions in the right side. Subsequently, one of the alveolus will be irrigated with 4ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline vasoconstrictor 1: 200,000 (BUPIROP® 0.5% ROPSOHN THERAPEUTICS SAS), the contralateral alveolus will be irrigated with 4 ml of saline solution 0.9% (Baxter laboratories) prior to the placement of the suture for the closure of the surgical wound, using the aspiration to avoid the exit of the medication out of the alveolus.
Interventions
BUPIROP® 0.5% ROPSOHN THERAPEUTICS S.A.S
Saline solution 0.9% (Baxter laboratories).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lower third molars impacted bilaterally requiring an osteotomy for their extraction and which are located spatially within the following positions or classes according to Pell \& Gregory (1933).
- Position B (occlusal plane of the impacted tooth between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the second molar).
- Position C (tooth impacted below the cervical line of the second molar).
- Class II (space between the second molar and the mandibular branch smaller than the distal mesial diameter of the third molar).
- Class III (All or most of the third molar is inside the mandibular branch).
- Systemically healthy patients (ASA I-II).
You may not qualify if:
- We exclude patients who present a history of infectious processes in the abscess area of third molars or who, for medical reasons, chronically use some type of analgesia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CES Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
CES University
Medellín, Colombia
Related Publications (2)
Khorshidi Khiavi R, Pourallahverdi M, Pourallahverdi A, Ghorani Khiavi S, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Mokhtari H. Pain control following impacted third molar surgery with bupivacaine irrigation of tooth socket: a prospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010 Fall;4(4):105-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2010.027. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
PMID: 23346335RESULTBrajkovic D, Biocanin V, Milic M, Vucetic M, Petrovic R, Brkovic B. Quality of analgesia after lower third molar surgery: A randomised, double-blind study of levobupivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 Jan;72(1):50-6. doi: 10.2298/vsp1501050b.
PMID: 26043591RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pablo Emilio Correa Echeverri
CES University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The decision to use another substance for the irrigation of the alveolus will be taken in a randomized manner.Through numerical assignment according to the order of surgical scheduling. The patients with even numbers are irrigated on the right side with bupivacaine and on the left side with saline. Patients with odd numbers will be irrigated in the opposite way. Patients will be considered blinded to the drug of choice, and they will not know what type of solution will be administered on each side.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Posgraduates Programs of Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2019
First Posted
May 15, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The disclosure of the data obtained in this study will be made through the publication of the trial in a scientific journal