NCT03607227

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to assess the effects of a continuous popliteal block on postoperative pain and recovery after major ear, nose and throat surgery with microvascular free flap reconstruction using a fibula graft.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 head-and-neck-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Typical duration for phase_4 head-and-neck-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2018

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 6, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 7, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

June 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

microsurgical free flapspopliteal nerve blockhead and neck cancerpostoperative pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain assessed by VAS (ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)).

    Change in pain in the operated leg, measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), between the two study groups (the two study arms described above). VAS assesses self-perceived pain. The scale ranges from 0 (meaning no pain at all) to 10 (meaning worst possible pain). Low VAS scores (representing no to low pain) are better than high VAS scores (representing severe pain).

    Assessment of pain using VAS three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up at the first office visit three months after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Postoperative nausea, assessed by VAS (ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst possible nausea)), and vomiting (yes/no).

    Assessment of nausea using VAS and occurence of vomiting (yes/no) three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment of nausea at the first office visit three months after surgery.

  • Postoperative sensory and motor function in the operated leg assessed by a simplified scale (ranging from 0 to 2, see description below).

    Assessment of sensory and motor function using the scale described above three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.

  • Ability of postoperative mobilization (sitting/standing/walking, with or without tools/aids).

    Assessment of level of mobilization (sitting/standing/walking) three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.

  • Opioid consumption in the postoperative period.

    Notation of the amount of opioids (preparation, route and dose) consumed is noted daily during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.

Study Arms (2)

Local anesthetic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.

Drug: Levobupivacaine

Saline

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as in the active substance arm.

Drug: Saline Solution

Interventions

Active substance. Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.

Local anesthetic

Placebo. Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as the active substances.

Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients at Skåne University hospital department of ear, nose and throat surgery undergoing major resection of maxilla or mandible and reconstruction using free fibula graft.
  • Preoperatively able to walk (with or without aid).

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological disease or peripheral neuropathy affecting the donor leg of the fibula graft.
  • Conditions of coagulopathy, or treatment with anticoagulant drugs, that contraindicates peripheral nerve block according to local guidelines.
  • Local anesthetic allergy.
  • Inability to understand study information or answer questions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Skane University Hospital Lund, Divison of Anaestesia and Intensive Care

Lund, Skåne County, 22185, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017.

    PMID: 26944243BACKGROUND
  • Ragbir M, Brown JS, Mehanna H. Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S191-S197. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000621.

    PMID: 27841135BACKGROUND
  • Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, Simon C, Uppington J, Zygun D, Ljungqvist O, Harris J. Optimal Perioperative Care in Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction: A Consensus Review and Recommendations From the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):292-303. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981.

    PMID: 27737447BACKGROUND
  • Borgeat A, Blumenthal S, Lambert M, Theodorou P, Vienne P. The feasibility and complications of the continuous popliteal nerve block: a 1001-case survey. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):229-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d.

    PMID: 16790658BACKGROUND
  • White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.

    PMID: 14570643BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMusculoskeletal PainPain, Postoperative

Interventions

LevobupivacaineSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BupivacaineAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Louise Walther Sturesson, MD, PhD

    Skåne University hospital, Region Skåne

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2018

First Posted

July 31, 2018

Study Start

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion

April 6, 2021

Study Completion

April 7, 2021

Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations