Continous Popliteal Block for Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction in Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery
Does Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block Improve Pain Management for Patients Undergoing Major Maxilla or Mandible Resection With Microvascular Reconstruction Using a Free Fibula Graft
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to assess the effects of a continuous popliteal block on postoperative pain and recovery after major ear, nose and throat surgery with microvascular free flap reconstruction using a fibula graft.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 head-and-neck-cancer
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for phase_4 head-and-neck-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 6, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2021
CompletedApril 8, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.6 years
June 20, 2018
April 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain assessed by VAS (ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)).
Change in pain in the operated leg, measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), between the two study groups (the two study arms described above). VAS assesses self-perceived pain. The scale ranges from 0 (meaning no pain at all) to 10 (meaning worst possible pain). Low VAS scores (representing no to low pain) are better than high VAS scores (representing severe pain).
Assessment of pain using VAS three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up at the first office visit three months after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative nausea, assessed by VAS (ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst possible nausea)), and vomiting (yes/no).
Assessment of nausea using VAS and occurence of vomiting (yes/no) three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment of nausea at the first office visit three months after surgery.
Postoperative sensory and motor function in the operated leg assessed by a simplified scale (ranging from 0 to 2, see description below).
Assessment of sensory and motor function using the scale described above three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.
Ability of postoperative mobilization (sitting/standing/walking, with or without tools/aids).
Assessment of level of mobilization (sitting/standing/walking) three times a day during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.
Opioid consumption in the postoperative period.
Notation of the amount of opioids (preparation, route and dose) consumed is noted daily during the first seven postoperative days, with follow-up assessment at the first office visit three months after surgery.
Study Arms (2)
Local anesthetic
ACTIVE COMPARATORLevobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORSaline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as in the active substance arm.
Interventions
Active substance. Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.
Placebo. Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as the active substances.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients at Skåne University hospital department of ear, nose and throat surgery undergoing major resection of maxilla or mandible and reconstruction using free fibula graft.
- Preoperatively able to walk (with or without aid).
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological disease or peripheral neuropathy affecting the donor leg of the fibula graft.
- Conditions of coagulopathy, or treatment with anticoagulant drugs, that contraindicates peripheral nerve block according to local guidelines.
- Local anesthetic allergy.
- Inability to understand study information or answer questions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
Study Sites (1)
Skane University Hospital Lund, Divison of Anaestesia and Intensive Care
Lund, Skåne County, 22185, Sweden
Related Publications (5)
Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017.
PMID: 26944243BACKGROUNDRagbir M, Brown JS, Mehanna H. Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S191-S197. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000621.
PMID: 27841135BACKGROUNDDort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, Simon C, Uppington J, Zygun D, Ljungqvist O, Harris J. Optimal Perioperative Care in Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction: A Consensus Review and Recommendations From the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):292-303. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981.
PMID: 27737447BACKGROUNDBorgeat A, Blumenthal S, Lambert M, Theodorou P, Vienne P. The feasibility and complications of the continuous popliteal nerve block: a 1001-case survey. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):229-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d.
PMID: 16790658BACKGROUNDWhite PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.
PMID: 14570643BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louise Walther Sturesson, MD, PhD
Skåne University hospital, Region Skåne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2018
First Posted
July 31, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 6, 2021
Study Completion
April 7, 2021
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share