Verify if Amelogenins Had Some Benefits in Improving Lower 2nd Molar Periodontal Healing After 3rd Molar Extraction
Usefulness of Amelogenins in the Treatment of Periodontal Defects on the Distal Surface of the Lower Second Molar After Adjacent Third Molar Extraction: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
5
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Prevention of periodontal defects after the extraction of lower third molars remains a challenge. Various methods have been proposed in the literature, but there are no studies which evaluated the effectiveness of amelogenins. Methods: A single-blind split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was performed on 5 patients to verify if amelogenins had some benefits in improving lower second molar periodontal healing after adjacent third molar extraction. A PPD ≥ 8 mm associated with a radiographic bone defect of at least 5 mm were the main inclusion criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 24, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2020
CompletedMarch 19, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.1 years
March 10, 2020
March 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
CAL (Clinical attachment level) pre operative
baseline, pre-surgery
CAL (Clinical attachment level) post operative
7 days after surgery
CAL (Clinical attachment level) 3 months
3 months after surgery.
CAL (Clinical attachment level) 12 months
12 months after surgery.
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) pre operative
baseline, pre-surgery
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) post operative
7 days after surgery
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) 3 months
3 months after surgery.
PPD (Periodontal probing dept) 12 months
12 months after surgery.
REC (recession) pre operative
baseline, pre-surgery
REC (recession) post operative
7 days after surgery
REC (recession) 3 months
3 months after surgery.
REC (recession) 12 months
12 months after surgery.
Radiographic bone Level pre operative
An endoral x-ray was taken baseline, pre-surgery
Radiographic bone Level post operative
An endoral x-ray was taken 7 days after surgery
Radiographic bone Level 3 months
An endoral x-ray was taken 3 months after surgery.
Radiographic bone Level 12 months
An endoral x-ray was taken 12 months after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Adverse Events pre operative
pre-operative
Adverse Events post operative
7 days after surgery
Adverse Events 3 months
3 months after surgery.
Adverse Events 12 months
12 months after surgery.
Study Arms (2)
amelogenins group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study involved enrolling 5 periodontitis free patients, to which the extraction of both lower third molars was prescribed. A bone defect at the distal surface of the second molar ≥ 5 mm, had to be present on the intraoral periapical radiography, bilaterally. Amelogenins effect was evaluated by applying them only in the test site and comparing healing results with those obtained on the contra-lateral site
placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe study involved enrolling 5 periodontitis free patients, to which the extraction of both lower third molars was prescribed. A bone defect at the distal surface of the second molar ≥ 5 mm, had to be present on the intraoral periapical radiography, bilaterally. In this group (control site) the conventional treatment was performed, and healing was ensured only by the simple blood clot
Interventions
amelogenins applied on the distal surface of the lower second molar after adjacent third molar extraction
placebo applied on the distal surface of the lower second molar after adjacent third molar extraction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \< 27, for which the extraction of both lower third molars was indicated
- Bilateral total (bone or osteo-mucosal) third molar impaction
- Bilateral bone defect ≥ 5mm distal to the lower second molars, evaluated on pre- operative periapical radiographs performed with Rinn's film holders
- PPD ≥ 8mm distal to the second lower molars, in at least one of the following probing sites: buccal, disto-buccal, disto-central, disto-lingual
- Intra-operative integrity of both third molar buccal and lingual alveolar cortices
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking habit
- Systemic disorders with serious immunologic impairment
- Taking cortisone or other drugs that might interfere with healing process
- Allergy to penicillins
- Previous periodontal treatment
- Less than 2 mm of adherent gingiva at second molar level
- Second molars with a prosthetic crown
- Previous endodontic treatment of second molars
- Furcation involvement of the second molars
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roberto Pippi, MDDS
University of Roma La Sapienza
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MDDS, associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2020
First Posted
March 19, 2020
Study Start
March 24, 2016
Primary Completion
April 20, 2018
Study Completion
April 20, 2018
Last Updated
March 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share