Walking Green: The Effects of Walking in Forested and Urban Areas
NUWG
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research hypothesizes that moderate physical activity in a "green environment" (e.g. a forest preserve path) has increased benefits on psychological measures (stress, anxiety, mood, depression, attention) and on physiological measures (Heart Rate Variability, Blood Glucose, Salivary Cortisol) when directly compared to activity in a "gray environment" (urban or suburban sidewalks). The study design is a randomized crossover design in which each subject is assigned randomly to a group which determines the order in which participants will walk in each location. Subjects will take three 50-minute walks per location in one week, with half of the subjects taking the urban walks first as per group assignment. Control data are collected on days when participants do not walk. Physiological data are taken during walks and control periods (heart rate, heart rate variation). Biomarker samples (saliva, dried blood spots) are taken on selected days. Psychological data are take before and after walks and control periods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2019
CompletedMay 3, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.2 years
May 13, 2019
May 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Psychological Effects - Mood
Change in Positive and Negative Affect scale 0 = never, 4 = very often. Higher Positive Affect scores reflect better reported mood scores. Lower Negative Affect Scores reflect better mood scores. Average values based on age
29 days
Psychological Effects - Anxiety
change in STAI (STAI-TRAIT anxiety) score based on a Likert scale self reported score. Higher scores indicate a higher level of self-reported anxiety.
29 days
Psychological Effects - Attention
change in vBDS (backward digit span) score lower scores indicate a increased inability to properly recall the numbers in the test.
29 days
Psychological Effects - Depression
change in CESD score. Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology. Citation: Radloff LS: The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population.
29 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Physiological Effects - Blood Glucose
29 days
Physiological Effects - Salivary Cortisol
29 days
Physiological Effects - Blood
29 days
Physiological Effects - Heart Rate Variation
29 days
Study Arms (2)
Forest
EXPERIMENTALEach subject is exposed to a 50 minute walk in a "green location" at some point during the crossover experiment. The psychological and physiological measurements taken during these walk location weeks are compared to the measurements from the other location. In addition a 'control' day is assigned for each location (ADL).
Urban
EXPERIMENTALEach subject is exposed to a 50 minute walk in a "gray location" at some point during the crossover experiment. The psychological and physiological measurements taken during these walk location weeks are compared to the measurements from the other location. In addition a 'control' day is assigned for each location (ADL).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- over the age of 18
- under the age of 35
- no current infections / recent infections (\<2weeks)
- PAR-Q+ scores indicative of readiness to engage in physical activity
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Inability to consent
- Incarcerated Persons
- non-adults
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, 60208, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Teresa Horton
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2019
First Posted
May 15, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 14, 2017
Study Completion
December 8, 2017
Last Updated
May 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share