Measuring Plasticity in SFC/dACC Following Theta-Burst-Stimulation Using TMS
BTMS
Estimating the Sensitivity of a Mobile Neuro-cognitive Platform ("BrainE") to Detect Neural Plasticity and Cognitive Enhancements Following Theta-burst Stimulation to Superior Frontal/dACC TMS Stimulation.
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study to determine whether particular forms of brain-stimulation, applied to superior frontal cortex/preSMA can affect cognition and associated frontal theta oscillations. To perform this study, the investigators first measure brain activity and cognitive performance using "BrainE", a cognitive task platform that assesses cognition on sustained attention, response inhibition, working memory, interference processing and emotion processing assessments. Next, the investigators apply brain-stimulation over a mid-frontal region associated with these tasks (mid-line frontal activity overlying superior frontal cortex/pre-SMA area). Finally, human subjects perform the "BrainE" task assessments again immediately after the brain-stimulation. The investigators compare the effects of brain stimulation on average frontal activity evoked across the cognitive tasks, and on the cognitive performance averaged across tasks. The investigators primarily compare the effects of two types of brain-stimulation against each other: intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (a protocol designed to excite brain activity) and continuous Theta-Burst-Stimulation (a stimulation protocol designed to inhibit brain activity).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 9, 2021
CompletedMarch 9, 2021
February 1, 2021
6 months
May 7, 2019
September 22, 2020
February 17, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post vs. Pre Change in Mid-frontal Theta Oscillations for iTBS vs. cTBS Stimulation
Change in superior frontal stimulus-evoked theta oscillations were measure on a set of cognitive tasks, specifically selective attention, response inhibition, working memory, interference processing and emotion processing tasks. The evoked EEG response (mid-frontal theta FCz as a source for superior frontal theta) was averaged across all cognitive tasks to yield a global cognitive task-averaged signal that was measured immediately before (Pre) and immediately after (Post) iTBS, and similarly immediately before (Pre) and immediately after (Post) cTBS.
(Post-Pre) iTBS and (Post-Pre) cTBS signals were measured one week apart.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Post vs. Pre Change in Cognitive Performance
(Post-Pre) iTBS and (Post-Pre) cTBS cognitive performance levels were measured one week apart.
Study Arms (2)
iTBS then cTBS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm first receive the iTBS brain stimulation in week 1, then have a one-week washout period and then receive cTBS brain stimulation in week 2. intermittent Theta-Burst-Stimulation (iTBS) entails a 2 second train of stimuli (stimuli occurring as a 50 Hz burst of three pulses separated by 200ms). Each 2 second train is followed by an 8 second pause, followed by another 2 second train. In total, 20 trains will be delivered, for a total of 200 bursts and 600 total pulses. continuous Theta-Burst-Stimulation (cTBS) consists of a continuous stimulus train (stimuli occurring as a 50 Hz burst of three pulses separated by 200ms). In total, 200 bursts and 600 total pulses will be delivered.
cTBS then iTBS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm first receive the cTBS brain stimulation in week 1, then have a one-week washout period and then receive iTBS brain stimulation in week 2.
Interventions
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied with intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 1 and continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 2.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied with continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 1 and intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adequate decisional capacity to make a choice about participating in this research study.
You may not qualify if:
- No major active neurologic/psychiatric disease
- No contraindications for rTMS
- No behavioral/medical factors that increase risk of seizure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Altman Clinical & Translational Research Institute
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jyoti Mishra
- Organization
- University of California San Diego
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jyoti Mishra, PhD
University of California, San Diego
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigators will assess for each subject whether they have any guess, a priori, as to hypothesized effects of the iTBS vs. cTBS protocols (improve, impair or no change on cognition). Participant/care provider will know which stimulation is being applied (iTBS, cTBS based on labels A \& B), but will not know the hypothesized effects of these two protocols. iTBS and cTBS protocols will be masked as "treatment A" and "treatment B", prior to handing the data over to PI/outcomes assessor. Analyses will thus be performed to assess whether treatment "A" or treatment "B" has an effect on cognition; and whether there are differences between these treatment protocols.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst Professor IR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2019
First Posted
May 10, 2019
Study Start
April 30, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Results First Posted
March 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02