NCT03946059

Brief Summary

This is a study to determine whether particular forms of brain-stimulation, applied to superior frontal cortex/preSMA can affect cognition and associated frontal theta oscillations. To perform this study, the investigators first measure brain activity and cognitive performance using "BrainE", a cognitive task platform that assesses cognition on sustained attention, response inhibition, working memory, interference processing and emotion processing assessments. Next, the investigators apply brain-stimulation over a mid-frontal region associated with these tasks (mid-line frontal activity overlying superior frontal cortex/pre-SMA area). Finally, human subjects perform the "BrainE" task assessments again immediately after the brain-stimulation. The investigators compare the effects of brain stimulation on average frontal activity evoked across the cognitive tasks, and on the cognitive performance averaged across tasks. The investigators primarily compare the effects of two types of brain-stimulation against each other: intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (a protocol designed to excite brain activity) and continuous Theta-Burst-Stimulation (a stimulation protocol designed to inhibit brain activity).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 7, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 9, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

May 7, 2019

Results QC Date

September 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post vs. Pre Change in Mid-frontal Theta Oscillations for iTBS vs. cTBS Stimulation

    Change in superior frontal stimulus-evoked theta oscillations were measure on a set of cognitive tasks, specifically selective attention, response inhibition, working memory, interference processing and emotion processing tasks. The evoked EEG response (mid-frontal theta FCz as a source for superior frontal theta) was averaged across all cognitive tasks to yield a global cognitive task-averaged signal that was measured immediately before (Pre) and immediately after (Post) iTBS, and similarly immediately before (Pre) and immediately after (Post) cTBS.

    (Post-Pre) iTBS and (Post-Pre) cTBS signals were measured one week apart.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Post vs. Pre Change in Cognitive Performance

    (Post-Pre) iTBS and (Post-Pre) cTBS cognitive performance levels were measured one week apart.

Study Arms (2)

iTBS then cTBS

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm first receive the iTBS brain stimulation in week 1, then have a one-week washout period and then receive cTBS brain stimulation in week 2. intermittent Theta-Burst-Stimulation (iTBS) entails a 2 second train of stimuli (stimuli occurring as a 50 Hz burst of three pulses separated by 200ms). Each 2 second train is followed by an 8 second pause, followed by another 2 second train. In total, 20 trains will be delivered, for a total of 200 bursts and 600 total pulses. continuous Theta-Burst-Stimulation (cTBS) consists of a continuous stimulus train (stimuli occurring as a 50 Hz burst of three pulses separated by 200ms). In total, 200 bursts and 600 total pulses will be delivered.

Device: iTBS then cTBS

cTBS then iTBS

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm first receive the cTBS brain stimulation in week 1, then have a one-week washout period and then receive iTBS brain stimulation in week 2.

Device: cTBS then iTBS

Interventions

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied with intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 1 and continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 2.

iTBS then cTBS

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied with continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 1 and intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol applied in week 2.

cTBS then iTBS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adequate decisional capacity to make a choice about participating in this research study.

You may not qualify if:

  • No major active neurologic/psychiatric disease
  • No contraindications for rTMS
  • No behavioral/medical factors that increase risk of seizure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Altman Clinical & Translational Research Institute

La Jolla, California, 92037, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jyoti Mishra
Organization
University of California San Diego

Study Officials

  • Jyoti Mishra, PhD

    University of California, San Diego

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Investigators will assess for each subject whether they have any guess, a priori, as to hypothesized effects of the iTBS vs. cTBS protocols (improve, impair or no change on cognition). Participant/care provider will know which stimulation is being applied (iTBS, cTBS based on labels A \& B), but will not know the hypothesized effects of these two protocols. iTBS and cTBS protocols will be masked as "treatment A" and "treatment B", prior to handing the data over to PI/outcomes assessor. Analyses will thus be performed to assess whether treatment "A" or treatment "B" has an effect on cognition; and whether there are differences between these treatment protocols.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The investigators will test the effects of two different interventions (iTBS, cTBS) on cognitive control. Each participant will receive both interventions, labeled A \& B, separated a week apart.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst Professor IR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2019

First Posted

May 10, 2019

Study Start

April 30, 2019

Primary Completion

October 30, 2019

Study Completion

October 30, 2019

Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Results First Posted

March 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Locations