Neural Mechanisms of Cannabinoid-impaired Decision-Making in Emerging Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emerging adults are a particularly vulnerable group for experiencing the immediate and potentially lifelong negative impacts of habitual cannabis use, and trends suggest that cannabis use disorder (CUD) will soon escalate in this population. The proposed research will combine clinical pharmacology, non-invasive brain stimulation, and neuroimaging techniques to establish the brain mechanisms of cannabinoid-impaired decision-making processes in emerging adults with CUD. Results from this project will inform CUD prevention/treatment efforts in this high-risk group and address a growing public health concern.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 13, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 5, 2024
CompletedApril 5, 2024
March 1, 2024
6.4 years
May 6, 2019
December 14, 2023
March 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Alpha Learning Rate
In a Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning Choice (PRLC) task, two stimuli are presented and choosing either could result in a monetary reinforcer, but the reinforcement probabilities of the stimuli differ, and change throughout the task. Individuals attempt to optimize choices according to learned probabilities and track changing probabilities over time. PRLC performance allows mathematical modeling of trial-by-trial data under "real-world" uncertainty and yields computational parameters, such as the learning rate. Choice data were analyzed using a Rescorla-Wanger learning model with an alpha learning rate, beta inverse temperature, and perseveration global parameters. Model-derived learning rates are indicative of an individual's ability to learn from previous choice outcomes to update future decision-making. For this task, learning rates range from 0-1 with lower values indicative of more optimal learning.
Measure collected at 2 time points: Baseline (0HR) and Post TMS Administration (3HR)
Self-Report Subjective "High"
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the acute subjective effects of THC at varying doses (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). Responses are made for VAS items along a 100-unit scale anchored on the extremes by "Not At All" (0) and "Extremely" (100) with a higher score meaning more of the effect. Participants were instructed to select "Not At All" (0) for all baseline (0HR) measures. Post-TMS administration (real or sham), participant self-reported their subjective "high" on the VAS with higher values indicating a more intense sensation of "high".
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and 3 hours (3HR) after capsule administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg)
Elasticity of Demand
Elasticity of Demand was measured by the Cannabis Purchase Task (CPT) where participants are asked how many "hits" of cannabis they would consume at 16 different price points in ascending order ($0-$140). Higher elasticity values indicate a greater sensitivity to changing price points resulting in a reduced demand for "hits" of THC at increasing price points.
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).
Working Memory Performance
Working memory (WM), the ability to hold a finite amount of information for a set amount of time, is measured by the N-Back task. Here, participants were presented with a sequence of letters and must indicate when the letter currently being viewed matches the one from N steps earlier in the sequence. The load factor "N" is adjusted between 0, 1, and 2 to adjust the difficulty of the task (0-Back = no WM load, 1-Back = minimal WM load, 2-Back = greater WM load) where a higher score means better memory performance. Outcomes are reported as the Total Accuracy Percentage (Correct Choices/Total Choices) x 100%
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).
Study Arms (2)
Excitatory TMS
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals assigned to this group will receive excitatory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC.
Inhibitory TMS
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals assigned to this group will receive inhibitory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC.
Interventions
Individuals will receive placebo dose and sham TMS.
Individuals will receive 10mg dose and sham TMS.
Individuals will receive 30mg dose and sham TMS.
Individuals will receive placebo and real TMS.
Individuals will receive10mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Individuals will receive 30mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Habitual cannabis use problems
- Body Mass Index ≤30
You may not qualify if:
- Past or current serious physical or mental health
- Sesame seed oil allergy
- Irregular health issues identified by the Study Physician
- Lack of affective form of birth control (females)
- Pregnancy (females)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Michael J. Wesley, PhDlead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Neurobehavioral Systems Lab of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine
Lexington, Kentucky, 40507, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Michael J Wesley
- Organization
- University of Kentucky
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J Wesley, PhD
University of Kentucky
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Functionality will be tested following combinations of THC and TMS will be tested in randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled experiments.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2019
First Posted
May 10, 2019
Study Start
July 15, 2017
Primary Completion
December 13, 2023
Study Completion
December 13, 2023
Last Updated
April 5, 2024
Results First Posted
April 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share