Testing the Effectiveness of a Parent and Child Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Child Venipuncture
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Both Parents and Children During Child Venipuncture
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study investigates the impact of mindfulness-based intervention for children undergoing a blood-draw and their accompanying parent on (a) child ratings of pain and fear, (b) parent and child ratings of parent distress, and (c) parent perceptions of child pain and fear. Half of the parent-child pairs will receive the mindfulness-based intervention, while half will receive an unfocused-attention task to serve as a comparison with no active component.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 13, 2020
CompletedJune 1, 2022
May 1, 2022
5 months
May 5, 2019
May 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Child pain during the needle: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Between group changes in child self-reported pain as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess pain intensity in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Pagé, Stinson, Campbell, Isaac, \& Katz, 2013; Vervoort et al., 2011).The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("a lot of pain").
Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
Child fear during the needle
Between group changes in child self-reported fear as rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS has been used to assess child fear in children aged 7 and older during acutely painful procedures (Hsieh et al., 2017; Vervoort et al., 2011). The NRS is rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 ("not scared") to 10 ("very scared").
Within two minutes following the needle-poke.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Child perceptions of parent distress
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Parent distress
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Other Outcomes (2)
Parent perceptions of child pain
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Parent perceptions of child fear
Within five minutes following the needle-poke.
Study Arms (2)
Mindfulness-Based Condition
EXPERIMENTALParents and children in the mindfulness intervention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of a mindfulness activity. There is a parent and child version of the mindfulness intervention. Both scripts were developed by Siegel and Bryson (2011), and include a parent and child version of a mindfulness activity targeting worries and anxiety. Adjustments to the child script were informed by the work of Petter and colleagues (2013). Adjustments to the parent script were informed by the work of Garland and colleagues (2015). This activity will last 5-minutes.
Unfocused attention Condition
SHAM COMPARATORParents and children in the unfocused attention condition will be provided with a tablet and accompanying headphones, and will listen to pre-recorded audio of an unfocused attention activity. There is a parent and child version of this activity. The parent version has been validated in other research with healthy adults as a control for a mindfulness intervention (Garland, Hanley, Farb, \& Froeliger, 2015). This script was condensed in time from the original reading. The child version of the activity was developed for the current study, and was adapted from a mind-wandering script used for children aged 7-12 in past research (Spann, 2016). It was also informed by the unfocused attention script used for parents (Garland, Hanley, Farb, \& Froeliger, 2015), and work by Cahn and Polich (2009). This activity will last 5-mintues.
Interventions
Each script for the mindfulness-based intervention was slightly modified to fit the context of a venipuncture, and begins with instructions to take deep breaths. Both scripts aim to cultivate present moment awareness of experiences, curiosity, nonjudgement, and acceptance of experiences as they unfold. In particular, the scripts ask that the participant visualize their worries and feelings as a cloud in the sky, and probes for curious thoughts about these experiences. The temporary nature of sensations is described, and the participant is asked to keep this openness and curiosity during the venipuncture.
Each script for the unfocused attention task instructs participants to allow their mind and thoughts to roam. The aim is to encourage the participant to continue thinking and mind wandering as they typically would.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Proficiency in English
You may not qualify if:
- Major developmental delays in child
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Hsieh LY, Chen YR, Lu MC. Efficacy of cold application on pain during chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial: A CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008642.
PMID: 29145288BACKGROUNDPage MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Identification of pain-related psychological risk factors for the development and maintenance of pediatric chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res. 2013;6:167-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S40846. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
PMID: 23503375BACKGROUNDVervoort T, Goubert L, Vandenbossche H, Van Aken S, Matthys D, Crombez G. Child's and parents' catastrophizing about pain is associated with procedural fear in children: a study in children with diabetes and their mothers. Psychol Rep. 2011 Dec;109(3):879-95. doi: 10.2466/07.15.16.21.PR0.109.6.879-895.
PMID: 22420118BACKGROUNDSpann, C. A. (2016). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: the impact of brief interventions on child affect, arousal, and cognition. The University of Texas at Arlington. Retrieved from https://uta-ir.tdl.org/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/25806/SPANN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
BACKGROUNDCahn BR, Polich J. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
PMID: 18845193BACKGROUNDGarland EL, Hanley A, Farb NA, Froeliger BE. State Mindfulness During Meditation Predicts Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal. Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Apr 1;6(2):234-242. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0250-6.
PMID: 26085851BACKGROUNDPetter M, Chambers CT, MacLaren Chorney J. The effects of mindfulness-based attention on cold pressor pain in children. Pain Res Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1155/2013/857045.
PMID: 23457685BACKGROUNDSiegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2011). The whole-brain child : 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. Delacorte Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books/about/The_Whole_Brain_Child.html?id=APzgCL8mgHUC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
BACKGROUNDConstantin KL, Moline RL, Pillai Riddell R, Spence JR, Fiacconi CM, Lupo-Flewelling K, McMurtry CM. Parent and child self- and co-regulation during pediatric venipuncture: Exploring heart rate variability and the effects of a mindfulness intervention. Dev Psychobiol. 2022 Jul;64(5):e22277. doi: 10.1002/dev.22277.
PMID: 35603416DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
C. Meghan McMurtry, PhD
University of Guelph
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be made explicitly aware of which group (intervention or control) that they have been allocated. Participants in each group will be provided with a tablet and guided through an audio activity. Further, participants will not be made aware of the kind of intervention being used, however, it is possible that participants may become aware of the nature of their treatment allocation in the mindfulness group.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2019
First Posted
May 8, 2019
Study Start
October 4, 2019
Primary Completion
March 13, 2020
Study Completion
March 13, 2020
Last Updated
June 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share