Study of the Value of Using a Honey Dressing Compared to the Use of a Standard Dressing on the Toe Amputation Wound in the Diabetic Patient
MELIDIAB
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Numerous scientific publications in France and internationally have described the healing, anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and immuno-modulating properties of honey. Honey is effective in the management of many infected or uninfected post-surgical wounds. This study focuses on post surgical wounds after toe amputation in diabetic patients. The main objective of this study is to compare the rate of epidermisation at six months for these wounds, between honey dressing and other dressing devices used according to the french Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2021
CompletedJune 22, 2022
June 1, 2022
2.6 years
April 4, 2019
June 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Epidermization rate at 6 months.
the relative difference between the volume of the wound in mm3 during the first rehabilitation of the post-operative dressing (J0) and this volume six months after (M6), on the volume of the wound in mm3 at J0. (TM6 = (VD0 - VM6) /VD0)
6 months after amputation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Epidermization rate at 12 months
12 months after amputation
pain during dressing change: verbal scale of pain
inclusion, 1month, 2 months, 3months, 4months, 5 months, 6 months,7months,8months, 8months ,9months 10months, 11months, 12 months after amputation up to cicatrization
average length of wound cicatrization
from date of amputation until the date of the first documented complete cicatrization, assessed up to 12 months
the satisfaction of professionals for the use of honey dressing
12 months after amputation or at study completion, whichever came first
Epidermization rate at 1 month
1 month after amputation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HAS dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients included in the "HAS dressing" arm will receive the best available dressing according to the HAS recommendations. HAS is the french National Authority for Health (HAS) .
Honey dressing
EXPERIMENTALthe honey used in this study is the Melectis G dressing. This is a combination of thyme honey (99.8%) and hyaluronic acid (0.2%). The patient will benefit from the honey dressing until complete healing and/or until the end of the study (maximum 12 months).
Interventions
The protocol includes rinsing the wound with the saline, gently drying the edge of the wound, applying a thin Mélectis®G film to the entire wound surface and covering with a secondary dressing. Dressings will be rehabilitated based on the evolution of the wound and clinical judgement of the investigator or nurse at home as recommended.
Patients included in the standard arm will receive the best available dressing according to the HAS recommendations. Dressings will be rehabilitated based on the evolution of the wound and clinical judgement of the investigator or nurse at home as recommended.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diabetic patients
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to honey, hyaluronic acid, guar gum, pectin and/or zinc oxide.
- Insipid Diabètes
- patient eligible for a dressing by Vacuum Assisted Closure therapy (VAC therapy)
- transmetatarsal amputation
- Patient with sutured wound
- Patient already included in the study, for a previous amputation for wich the wound has not healed.
- Failure to comply with protocol requirements
- Person protect by article L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Health Public.
- Patient include in an other clinical study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hélène Blaise
Chambéry, 73011, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2019
First Posted
May 1, 2019
Study Start
June 27, 2018
Primary Completion
February 8, 2021
Study Completion
February 8, 2021
Last Updated
June 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share