NCT03926533

Brief Summary

Although more than 50% of survivors of critical illness experience one or more post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) problems, there are still no validated interventions for the management of PICS. The long-term goal of this study is to develop and refine in-person and telehealth strategies for the delivery of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) recovery care for the treatment of PICS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
91

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 24, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2019

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 3, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Post-Intensive Care Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptability

    participants will complete the 4-item Likert response Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) of perceived intervention acceptability. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree = 1 Completely Agree = 5 ). Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. Scores are based on calculated mean.

    6 months

  • participants will complete the 4-item Likert response Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    participants will complete the 4-item Likert response Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) of perceived intervention feasibility. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree = 1 Completely Agree = 5 ). Higher scores indicate greater feasibility. Scores are based on calculated mean.

    6 months

  • Appropriateness

    participants will complete the 4-item Likert response Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) of perceived intervention appropriateness. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree = 1 Completely Agree = 5 ). Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness. Scores are based on calculated mean.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • cognitive impairment

    6 months

  • depression

    6 months

  • physical impairments

    6 months

  • QOL

    6 months

  • anxiety

    6 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Telehealth ICU Recovery Program

EXPERIMENTAL

Components of the ICU RC telehealth visit will be structured parallel to what is done during a typical in-person clinic visit. The telehealth intervention consists of 5 chronological components conducted during two 1.5 hour telehealth clinic visits (the same time required for an in-person visit). Upon completion of the pre-intervention baseline assessment, the study coordinator will contact patients randomized to the intervention arm to schedule the first telehealth visit. Study visits will occur at 3 weeks and 3 months following hospital discharge.

Other: Telehealth

Standard Recovery Conditions

NO INTERVENTION

participants assigned to the standard of care control group will be contacted by the study coordinator to ensure the patient has a primary care and/or specialist appointment scheduled. At this time, patients will also receive an electronic PICS guide for ICU survivors created by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Patients will be directed to use the information provided in the PICS guide for ICU survivors to connect with resources.

Interventions

Telehealth visits will be conducted from a private telehealth lab room in the Vanderbilt ICU Recovery Center using a live and interactive approach where providers and patients interact and communicate in real-time using Zoom, a secure video-conferencing platform recommended by Vanderbilt Telehealth.

Telehealth ICU Recovery Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • index ICU stay with a diagnosis of sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome projected to be discharged alive as these patients are at the highest risk for developing PICS

You may not qualify if:

  • no access to computer, electronic device (e.g., tablet, smartphone), and/or internet connection for virtual clinic visit,
  • primary care received outside of VUMC network,
  • hospice care at discharge,
  • substance abuse or psychiatric disorder that prevents independent living,
  • blind, deaf, unable to speak English, or
  • severe dementia prior to index hospitalization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37129, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Boehm LM, Danesh V, LaNoue M, Trochez RJ, Jones AC, Kimpel CC, Sevin CM. Factors Influencing Engagement with in-Person Intensive Care Unit Recovery Clinic Services. J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;38(4):375-381. doi: 10.1177/08850666221127154. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

    PMID: 36128790BACKGROUND
  • Boehm LM, Danesh V, Eaton TL, McPeake J, Pena MA, Bonnet KR, Stollings JL, Jones AC, Schlundt DG, Sevin CM. Multidisciplinary ICU Recovery Clinic Visits: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Provider Dialogues. Chest. 2023 Apr;163(4):843-854. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

  • Kovaleva MA, Jones AC, Kimpel CC, Lauderdale J, Sevin CM, Stollings JL, Jackson JC, Boehm LM. Patient and caregiver experiences with a telemedicine intensive care unit recovery clinic. Heart Lung. 2023 Mar-Apr;58:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

  • Kovaleva MA, Jones AC, Kimpel CC, Lauderdale JL, Sevin CM, Boehm LM. Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions of Intensive Care Unit Hospitalization and Recovery. Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jul 1;31(4):319-323. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022945.

  • Eaton TL, Danesh V, Jones AC, Kimpel CC, Sevin CM, Su H, Toth KM, Valley TS, Iwashyna TJ, Boehm LM, McPeake J. Clinician and Patient Responses to US Health Insurers' Policies: A Qualitative Study of Higher Risk Patients. Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun;60(3):e14615. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14615. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

  • Hussain AA, Jones AC, Hosey MM, Kiehl A, Danesh V, McPeake J, Toth K, Eaton TL, Su H, Jackson JC, Boehm LM. Patient-psychologist telemedicine interactions in an intensive care unit recovery clinic: Qualitative secondary analysis. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103886. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103886. Epub 2024 Nov 21.

  • Carter SJ, Lauderdale J, Stollings JL, Sevin CM, Cunningham-Erves J, Kokoy S, Clouse K, Boehm LM. Factors Influencing Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making in the Post-ICU Period: A Secondary Analysis. CHEST Crit Care. 2023 Dec;1(3):100027. doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100027. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

  • Danesh V, McDonald AD, McPeake J, Eaton TL, Potter K, Su H, Jackson JC, Boehm LM. Driving decisions after critical illness: Qualitative analysis of patient-provider reviews during ICU recovery clinic assessments. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Oct;146:104560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104560. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessRespiratory Distress SyndromeShock, Septicpostintensive care syndrome

Interventions

Telemedicine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersSepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationShock

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Posted

April 24, 2019

Study Start

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 31, 2023

Study Completion

February 28, 2023

Last Updated

August 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations