Study Stopped
PI- Dr. Jellish passed away. The study was terminated with the IRB
Postoperative Pain and Headache After Craniotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of an anesthetic technique which is not synthetic opioid based, on postoperative pain modulation and development of post craniotomy headache against a cohort of patients where an opioid based standard anesthetic technique was used for craniotomy. The hypothesis that is tested is that the use of agents other than synthetic short acting opioids will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and the incidence of headache after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_2 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 2, 2022
CompletedJune 12, 2020
June 1, 2020
2 years
March 29, 2019
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Post craniotomy pain
Assessed via a Verbal Analog Scale from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced
6 months
Headache intensity
Assessed via qualitative rating of sharp, dull, pressure, or incisional pain
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard of Care patients will be given an infusion of remifentanil 0.15-0.25 mcg/kg/min as part of their intraoperative anesthetic regimen. The infusion will be maintained until the end of surgery and will be discontinued upon emergence. Prior to emergence, 100-200 mcg of fentanyl will be titrated for additional analgesia after emergence.
Methadone
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals in this group will receive an identical anesthetic without the addition of remifentanil. They will be given methadone 0.2 mg/kg IV at the beginning of the anesthetic. A lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg will be given with induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion of lidocaine at 2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery.
Interventions
Individuals in this group will receive an identical anesthetic without the addition of remifentanil. They will be given methadone 0.2 mg/kg IV at the beginning of the anesthetic. A lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg will be given with induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion of lidocaine at 2 mg/kg/hr until the end of surgery.
Standard of Care patients will be given an infusion of remifentanil 0.15-0.25 mcg/kg/min as part of their intraoperative anesthetic regimen. The infusion will be maintained until the end of surgery and will be discontinued upon emergence. Prior to emergence, 100-200 mcg of fentanyl will be titrated for additional analgesia after emergence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing Supratentorial, Infratentorial or Skull Base Tumor resection.
- Age 18 to 75
- ASA physical status I to III
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status IV or V
- Allergies to the medication used for the study
- Pregnant
- Undergoing Emergency, Neurovascular, or Trigeminal Nerve pain procedure
- Liver or renal failure
- Unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Steven Edelsteinlead
Study Sites (1)
Loyola Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60156, United States
Related Publications (10)
De Benedittis G, Lorenzetti A, Migliore M, Spagnoli D, Tiberio F, Villani RM. Postoperative pain in neurosurgery: a pilot study in brain surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996 Mar;38(3):466-9; discussion 469-70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00008.
PMID: 8837797BACKGROUNDde Gray LC, Matta BF. Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy: a review. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):693-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.03997.x.
PMID: 15960721BACKGROUNDMosek AC, Dodick DW, Ebersold MJ, Swanson JW. Headache after resection of acoustic neuroma. Headache. 1999 Feb;39(2):89-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3902089.x.
PMID: 15613200BACKGROUNDKoperer H, Deinsberger W, Jodicke A, Boker DK. Postoperative headache after the lateral suboccipital approach: craniotomy versus craniectomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1999 Dec;42(4):175-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1053393.
PMID: 10667820BACKGROUNDPedrosa CA, Ahern DK, McKenna MJ, Ojemann RG, Acquadro MA. Determinants and impact of headache after acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15(6):793-7.
PMID: 8572094BACKGROUNDVijayan N. Postoperative headache in acoustic neuroma. Headache. 1995 Feb;35(2):98-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3502098.x.
PMID: 7737870BACKGROUNDLai J, Porreca F, Hunter JC, Gold MS. Voltage-gated sodium channels and hyperalgesia. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;44:371-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121627.
PMID: 14744251BACKGROUNDInouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.
PMID: 2240918BACKGROUNDJellish WS, Leonetti JP, Sawicki K, Anderson D, Origitano TC. Morphine/ondansetron PCA for postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting after skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.02.027.
PMID: 16890064BACKGROUNDHawthorne G, Sansoni J, Hayes L, Marosszeky N, Sansoni E. Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.010.
PMID: 24698296BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Walter Jellish, MD/Ph.D
Loyola University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Steven Edelstein, MD
Loyola University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Study participant will be blinded
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology, Vice-Chairman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2019
First Posted
April 9, 2019
Study Start
January 2, 2019
Primary Completion
January 2, 2021
Study Completion
January 2, 2022
Last Updated
June 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share individual Data.