Sensory Motor Lateralization as Handwriting Intervention in School-Based OT
SML
Handwriting Intervention, With vs. Without a Rightward Bias, in a Junior High School-A Randomized Controlled Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
16
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Children who attend School-Based Occupational Therapy (SBOT) show mixed dominance and a liable decreased in the structural and functional differentiation between the two hemispheres. The lack of right-left disparity has been found to link to mirror invariance, poor spatial organization, fragmentary reversals, and handwriting difficulty. This study intends to find out, whether, Sensory Motor Lateralization (SML), "With" a rightward bias, profits handwriting more than the conventional (CON) "Without".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2019
CompletedApril 9, 2019
April 1, 2019
4 months
April 3, 2019
April 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
SML excels CON in manuscript letter legibility
Assess by the percent accuracy score of manuscript letter legibility derived from the Wold Sentence Copying Test (WSCT). TThe letter legibility score was calculated by counting the total number of letters the participant wrote minus the writing errors per THS-R criteria, divided by the total number of characters written, and multiplied by 100. The minimum is 0, and the maximum is 100. The higher values represent better treatment outcome.
Change from Baseline percent accuracy score at 3 months
SML excels CON in script letter legibility
Assess by the percent accuracy score of script letter legibility derived from the Wold Sentence Copying Test (WSCT). The letter legibility score was calculated by counting the total number of letters the participant wrote minus the writing errors per THS-R criteria, divided by the total number of characters written, and multiplied by 100. The minimum is 0, and the maximum is 100. The higher values represent better treatment outcome.
Change from Baseline percent accuracy score at 3 months
SML excels CON in manuscript transcription speed
Assess by WSCT.Speed was derived from the total number of letters written timed 60, divided by the total number of seconds used, and recorded as number of letters per minute. The minimum is 0, and there is no maximum. The higher values represent better treatment outcome.
Change from Baseline letters per minute at 3 months
SML excels CON in script transcription speed
Assess by WSCT. Speed was derived from the total number of letters written timed 60, divided by the total number of seconds used, and recorded as number of letters per minute. The minimum is 0, and there is no maximum. The higher values represent better treatment outcome.
Change from Baseline letters per minute at 3 months
Other Outcomes (3)
SML excels CON in Visual Motor Integration
Change from Baseline raw score at 3 months
SML excels CON in Visual Perception
Change from Baseline raw score at 3 months
SML excels CON in Motor Coordination
Change from Baseline raw score at 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Sensory Motor Lateralization (SML)
EXPERIMENTALThis was a group of 8 junior high school students who received SML in school for handwriting difficulty during the 2012-13 School Year. The participants received left eye-and-ear occlusion, fitness exercises, fine motor speed training, and handwriting practice on their right hand only.
Conventional School-Based OT (CON)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis was a group of 8 junior high school students who received conventional school-based Occupational Therapy service for handwriting difficulty during the 2012-13 School Year. The participants received a like fitness exercises, fine motor speed training, and handwriting practice on their dominant hand instead.
Interventions
SML consists of supervised handwriting practice, fitness exercises, and fine motor speed drills that preferentially belabor a participant's right eye, ear, hand and leg during therapy.
CON consists of supervised handwriting practice, fitness exercises, and fine motor speed drills on the participant's dominant hand.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any Special or Regular Education students with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), OT mandates, and handwriting goals.
- Has Intelligence Quotient (IQ) equal to or above 60.
- Ambulatory.
- Proficient in English, and fluent in naming, identifying, and accessing the sequence of letters in the alphabet.
- The students who attend Physical Therapy (PT), Adaptive Physical Education (PE), and any other programs are included, if the programs being provided are skill-, theme-, or task-oriented, not involving any muscle strengthening activities.
You may not qualify if:
- All are excluded, if the study candidates have any medical condition(s) that would prohibit them from the full physical participation in school.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mary H. Tenglead
Related Publications (23)
Adi-Japha E, Landau YE, Frenkel L, Teicher M, Gross-Tsur V, Shalev RS. ADHD and dysgraphia: underlying mechanisms. Cortex. 2007 Aug;43(6):700-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70499-4.
PMID: 17710822BACKGROUNDAnguera JA, Russell CA, Noll DC, Seidler RD. Neural correlates associated with intermanual transfer of sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Res. 2007 Dec 14;1185:136-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.088. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
PMID: 17996854BACKGROUNDAssmus A, Marshall JC, Noth J, Zilles K, Fink GR. Difficulty of perceptual spatiotemporal integration modulates the neural activity of left inferior parietal cortex. Neuroscience. 2005;132(4):923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.047.
PMID: 15857698BACKGROUNDBryden PJ, Bruyn J, Fletcher P. Handedness and health: an examination of the association between different handedness classifications and health disorders. Laterality. 2005 Sep;10(5):429-40. doi: 10.1080/13576500442000193.
PMID: 16191813BACKGROUNDCoghill RC, Gilron I, Iadarola MJ. Hemispheric lateralization of somatosensory processing. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2602-12. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.6.2602.
PMID: 11387404BACKGROUNDCorbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15. doi: 10.1038/nrn755.
PMID: 11994752BACKGROUNDDavidson RJ, Jackson DC, Kalin NH. Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):890-909. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.890.
PMID: 11107881BACKGROUNDHirnstein M, Bayer U, Ellison A, Hausmann M. TMS over the left angular gyrus impairs the ability to discriminate left from right. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.028. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
PMID: 21035475BACKGROUNDHirnstein M, Hugdahl K, Hausmann M. How brain asymmetry relates to performance - a large-scale dichotic listening study. Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 2;4:997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00997. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24427151BACKGROUNDHoy MM, Egan MY, Feder KP. A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Can J Occup Ther. 2011 Feb;78(1):13-25. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3.
PMID: 21395194BACKGROUNDHughes CM, Reissig P, Seegelke C. Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
PMID: 21663882BACKGROUNDDundas EM, Plaut DC, Behrmann M. The joint development of hemispheric lateralization for words and faces. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):348-58. doi: 10.1037/a0029503. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
PMID: 22866684BACKGROUNDHlustik P, Solodkin A, Gullapalli RP, Noll DC, Small SL. Functional lateralization of the human premotor cortex during sequential movements. Brain Cogn. 2002 Jun;49(1):54-62. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1483.
PMID: 12027392BACKGROUNDJancke L. A differential effect of concurrent verbal activity on right arm movements rightwards and leftwards. Cortex. 1993 Mar;29(1):161-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80221-3.
PMID: 8472554BACKGROUNDGranert O, Peller M, Gaser C, Groppa S, Hallett M, Knutzen A, Deuschl G, Zeuner KE, Siebner HR. Manual activity shapes structure and function in contralateral human motor hand area. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
PMID: 20708692BACKGROUNDSchott GD. Mirror writing: neurological reflections on an unusual phenomenon. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;78(1):5-13. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.094870. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
PMID: 16963501BACKGROUNDSabate M, Gonzalez B, Rodriguez M. Brain lateralization of motor imagery: motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1041-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.015.
PMID: 15093143BACKGROUNDSaugstad LF. Cerebral lateralisation and rate of maturation. Int J Psychophysiol. 1998 Jan;28(1):37-62. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00063-9.
PMID: 9506310BACKGROUNDLee DR, Kim YH, Kim DA, Lee JA, Hwang PW, Lee MJ, You SH. Innovative strength training-induced neuroplasticity and increased muscle size and strength in children with spastic cerebral palsy: an experimenter-blind case study--three-month follow-up. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(1):131-6. doi: 10.3233/NRE-131036.
PMID: 24419014BACKGROUNDMazziotta JC, Phelps ME. Human sensory stimulation and deprivation: positron emission tomographic results and strategies. Ann Neurol. 1984;15 Suppl:S50-60. doi: 10.1002/ana.410150711.
PMID: 6611127BACKGROUNDPeters M, Reimers S, Manning JT. Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: the BBC internet study. Brain Cogn. 2006 Nov;62(2):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
PMID: 16797814BACKGROUNDVingerhoets G, Acke F, Alderweireldt AS, Nys J, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Apr;33(4):763-77. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21247. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
PMID: 21500314BACKGROUNDVingerhoets G, Sarrechia I. Individual differences in degree of handedness and somesthetic asymmetry predict individual differences in left-right confusion. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 1;204(1):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
PMID: 19523492BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Bédard, P., Wu, M., \& Sanes, J. N. (2011). Brain Activation Related to Combinations of Gaze Position, Visual Input, and Goal-Directed Hand Movements. Cerebral Cortex, 21(6), 1273-1282.
- Corballis, M. C. (2014). Left brain, right brain: facts and fantasies. PLoS Biology, 12(1), e1001767.
- Frey, S. H. (2008). Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Archives of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 363, 1951-7.
- Guerraz, M., Blouin, J., \& Vercher, J. L. (2003). From head orientation to head control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing. Experimental Brain research, 150, 40-9.
- Heilman, K. M., Howell, G., Valenstein, E., \& Rothi, L. (1980). Mirror-reading and writing in association with right-left spatial disorientation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 43(9), 774-80.
- Sibley, B. A. and Jennifer L. Etnier, J. L. (2003). The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: A meta-analysis. Review Article. Pediatric Exercise Science, 15, 243-256.
- Weintraub, N., \& Graham, S. (2000). The contribution of gender, orthographic, finger function, and visual-motor processes to the prediction of handwriting status. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20(2), 121-140
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary H Teng, MS, OTR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In this study, since the Principal Investigator was the intervener to both study groups, and also the data collector, an effort was made to ensure that both the pre- and posttest were administered in the presence of one other Occupational Therapist, Registered (OTR) and/or a Physical Therapist, who shared the use of the room with Mrs. Teng, test booklets were encrypted, and, that the participants, parents, test graders (one different OTR to each test instrument), and statisticians were kept blind to the group assignment of each participant.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2019
First Posted
April 4, 2019
Study Start
September 12, 2012
Primary Completion
January 4, 2013
Study Completion
June 12, 2013
Last Updated
April 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- I intend to publish this study. I'll make IPD available to other researchers afterwards.
- Access Criteria
- I intend to publish this study. I'll make IPD available to other researchers afterwards.
I intend to publish this study. I'll make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers afterwards.