NCT03883568

Brief Summary

Rationale: Despite a large and growing disease burden in osteoarthritis (OA), many pharmaceutical companies have abandoned OA drug development. This is mainly due to the lack of appropriate outcome measures that can robustly identify patients that can benefit from a specific therapy. Different phenotypes of OA may benefit from different types of treatment. Therefore, novel markers to identify selected phenotypes of osteoarthritis may encourage drug development. Objective: To prospectively describe in detail pre-identified progressing phenotypes of patients with knee OA by use of conventional and novel clinical, imaging, and biochemical (bio)markers, and to validate and refine a predictive model for these (and new) progressing phenotypes based on these markers. Study design: APPROACH is an exploratory, European, five-centre, 2-year prospective follow-up, cohort study, with extensive measurements. In this study patients are treated according to regular care by their own physician with no study related treatment prescribed. Study related diagnostic and/or monitoring procedures are applied to the patients. Study population: Patients with tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis, according to the clinical ACR classification criteria, pre-identified based on demographic (e.g. age), clinical (e.g. Pain NRS) and tissue structure (e.g. radiographic joint space width) parameters. Main study parameters/endpoints: Joint tissue structure based on radiographs, MRI, and biochemical (bio)markers as well as symptoms (pain, function) and quality of life by questionnaires. Secondary parameters: A multitude of (novel and conventional) clinical, imaging, and biochemical parameters related to osteoarthritis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The participants will not have any direct benefit from their participation in this study other than that their OA is maximally diagnosed and followed in detail for up to 2 years (screening, baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months).

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
297

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
4 countries

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 19, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2019

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 3, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

July 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

phenotypes(bio)markers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • OA structural progression of the index knee

    radiographic joint space width in mm

    over two years

  • OA pain progression of the index knee

    increase in points in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain (0-100; 0 worst, 100 best condition)

    over two years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • OA progression of the index knee

    over two years

  • OA progression

    over two years

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis, according to the clinical ACR classification criteria, pre-identified based on demographic (e.g. age), clinical (e.g. Pain NRS) and tissue structure (e.g. radiographic joint space width) parameters.

You may qualify if:

  • Informed consent obtained.
  • Ambulatory (able to walk unassisted)
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Capable of understanding the study
  • Capable of writing and reading in local language
  • Predominantly tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis and satisfy the clinical classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR): Knee pain and three of the following criteria: over 50 years age, less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness, crepitus on active motion, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, or no palpable warmth.
  • Highest probability to progress based on the algorithm based on the following parameters:
  • Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
  • BMI (in recording height and weight)
  • Pain NRS of the index knee at the moment of the screening visit
  • Pain NRS of the index knee during the last week before the screening visit
  • Age
  • Gender
  • KIDA parameters of the index knee, based on standardized weight-bearing (KIDA) radiograph, measured \< 3 months (patients with a Joint Space Width (JSW) \< 2 mm of the index knee will not be included)

You may not qualify if:

  • Not being able to comply to the protocol
  • Participating in a trial with local therapeutic intervention for index knee OA (pharmaceutical or surgical) or systemic Disease Modifying OsteoArthritic Drugs (DMOADs) or potential DMOADs treatments for OA at the same time or within the past 6 months or anticipated in the forthcoming; participation in non-interventional registries or epidemiological studies is allowed.
  • Surgery of the index knee in the past 6 months (to avoid interferences with imaging)
  • Scheduled or expected surgery of the index knee in the next 2 years (to avoid interferences with imaging)
  • Pregnancy (child bearing woman) because of imaging (radiation and MRI, risks)
  • Predominantly patellar femoral knee OA (clinical judgment)
  • The following secondary osteoarthritis of the knee: clinically significant deformities of the lower limbs (varus \>10°, valgus \>10°), septic arthritis, inflammatory joint disease, gout, major chondrocalcinosis (pseudogout), Paget's disease of the bone, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, rheumatic symptoms due to malignancies, primary osteochondromatosis, osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans, haemophilia
  • Generalized pain syndrome, for example fibromyalgia
  • Patients with contra indication to MRI or CT
  • Hip replacement or expected hip replacement within 6 months
  • Osteosynthesis material near the knee joint
  • Self-reported severe Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration or facet OA

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Saint-Antoine hospital, AP-HP

Paris, France

Location

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, Netherlands

Location

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands

Location

Diakonhjemmet hospital

Oslo, Norway

Location

SERGAS

A Coruña, Spain

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Jansen MP, Wirth W, Bacardit J, van Helvoort EM, Marijnissen ACA, Kloppenburg M, Blanco FJ, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Ladel CH, Loef M, Lafeber FPJG, Welsing PM, Mastbergen SC, Roemer FW. Machine-learning predicted and actual 2-year structural progression in the IMI-APPROACH cohort. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 May 1;13(5):3298-3306. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-949. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

  • Brett A, Bowes MA, Conaghan PG. Comparison of 3D quantitative osteoarthritis imaging biomarkers from paired CT and MR images: data from the IMI-APPROACH study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 30;24(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06187-2.

  • Roemer FW, Jansen M, Marijnissen ACA, Guermazi A, Heiss R, Maschek S, Lalande A, Blanco FJ, Berenbaum F, van de Stadt LA, Kloppenburg M, Haugen IK, Ladel CH, Bacardit J, Wisser A, Eckstein F, Lafeber FPJG, Weinans HH, Wirth W. Structural tissue damage and 24-month progression of semi-quantitative MRI biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis in the IMI-APPROACH cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05926-1.

  • Wirth W, Maschek S, Marijnissen ACA, Lalande A, Blanco FJ, Berenbaum F, van de Stadt LA, Kloppenburg M, Haugen IK, Ladel CH, Bacardit J, Wisser A, Eckstein F, Roemer FW, Lafeber FPJG, Weinans HH, Jansen M. Test-retest precision and longitudinal cartilage thickness loss in the IMI-APPROACH cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Feb;31(2):238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

  • van Helvoort EM, Jansen MP, Marijnissen ACA, Kloppenburg M, Blanco FJ, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Bay-Jensen AC, Ladel C, Lalande A, Larkin J, Loughlin J, Mobasheri A, Weinans HH, Widera P, Bacardit J, Welsing PMJ, Lafeber FPJG. Predicted and actual 2-year structural and pain progression in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Dec 23;62(1):147-157. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac292.

  • Angelini F, Widera P, Mobasheri A, Blair J, Struglics A, Uebelhoer M, Henrotin Y, Marijnissen AC, Kloppenburg M, Blanco FJ, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Ladel C, Larkin J, Bay-Jensen AC, Bacardit J. Osteoarthritis endotype discovery via clustering of biochemical marker data. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 May;81(5):666-675. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221763. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

  • van Helvoort EM, Welsing PMJ, Jansen MP, Gielis WP, Loef M, Kloppenburg M, Blanco F, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Bay-Jensen AC, Ladel C, Lalande A, Larkin J, Loughlin J, Mobasheri A, Weinans H, Lafeber F, Eijkelkamp N, Mastbergen S. Neuropathic pain in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort: prevalence and phenotyping. RMD Open. 2021 Dec;7(3):e002025. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002025.

  • Taylor J, Dekker S, Jurg D, Skandsen J, Grossman M, Marijnissen AK, Ladel C, Mobasheri A, Larkin J, Weinans H, Kanter-Schlifke I; APPROACH research consortium and APPROACH Principal Investigators. Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH). Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 10;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0.

  • van Helvoort EM, van Spil WE, Jansen MP, Welsing PMJ, Kloppenburg M, Loef M, Blanco FJ, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Bacardit J, Ladel CH, Loughlin J, Bay-Jensen AC, Mobasheri A, Larkin J, Boere J, Weinans HH, Lalande A, Marijnissen ACA, Lafeber FPJG. Cohort profile: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) study: a 2-year, European, cohort study to describe, validate and predict phenotypes of osteoarthritis using clinical, imaging and biochemical markers. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 28;10(7):e035101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035101.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

serum, plasma, blood DNA, blood RNA, urine

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Floris PJ Lafeber, PhD

    UMC Utrecht

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, director of research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2018

First Posted

March 21, 2019

Study Start

January 19, 2018

Primary Completion

April 3, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

June 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Locations