NCT03750279

Brief Summary

This study is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 19, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2018

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 24, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 24, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 8, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritisInflammationPhotobiomodulationLow-level laser therapyDouble-blindRandomized clinical trialRCT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain on movement

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced on movement using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Pain at night

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced in bed at night using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Pain at rest

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced at rest in sitting position using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Pain in general

    Pain in general is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire pain subscale. The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories. The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Physical function in daily living

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Physical function in sports and recreational activities

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Quality of life

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • Global health status assessment

    8 weeks after randomization

  • Real time ultrasonography assessment of effusion

    0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Exercise therapy + LLLT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Exercise therapy 3 times per week for 8 weeks from baseline. * LLLT applied to the knee 3 times per week for 3 weeks from baseline.

Other: Exercise therapyOther: LLLT

Exercise therapy + sham LLLT

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

* Exercise therapy 3 times per week for 8 weeks from baseline. * Sham LLLT applied to the knee 3 times per week for 3 weeks from baseline.

Other: Exercise therapyOther: Sham LLLT

Interventions

* 5 min. warm up with light exercises for the lower limb prior to strength/endurance exercise therapy. * Strength/endurance exercise therapy including level 1 or 2 per session: Level 1: Pelvic lifts (2x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (2x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may progress from level 1 to level 2. Level 2: Pelvic lifts (3x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (3x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg), sideways slide (2x10 rep. per leg), and backwards slide (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may regress from level 2 to level 1.

Exercise therapy + LLLTExercise therapy + sham LLLT
LLLTOTHER

\- LLLT (60 mW mean output per probe, 904 nm wavelength) applied to the knee in adherence with the recommendations by World Association for Laser Therapy, in terms of dosage per treatment spot.

Exercise therapy + LLLT

\- Same procedure as in the LLLT group with the exception of laser irradiation (0 mW mean output power).

Exercise therapy + sham LLLT

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Any gender
  • Age ≥ 50 years
  • Pain on movement ≥ 40 mm Visual Analog Scale
  • Knee pain for the last ≥ 3 months
  • KOA verified with the American College of Rheumatology criteria using a history and physical examination, i.e. knee pain and at least three of the following: ≥ 50 years old, ≤ 30 minutes of morning stiffness, crepitus on active range of motion, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, and no palpable warmth of synovia

You may not qualify if:

  • Knee alloplastic
  • Total meniscectomy
  • Intra-articular steroid injection and/or oral steroid treatment within the last six months
  • Cancer
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe cognitive deficit
  • Neurological deficits affecting the knee
  • Inability to speak and understand English/Norwegian

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Bergen

Bergen, 5018, Norway

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeInflammation

Interventions

Exercise TherapyLow-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesLaser TherapyPhototherapy

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Two laser devices of the same appearance are used, i.e. one with 3x60 mW output power and one with 0 mW output power (sham). Participants in one group is treated with the sham laser device and the other group is treated with laser. The laser beam is invisible for the eye (wavelength 904 nm) and of such low power that heat is not detected. Thus, the participants, therapists and assessors are unaware of which laser device is active/inactive. The laser devices were randomly coded by a secretary who is not otherwise involved in the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2018

First Posted

November 23, 2018

Study Start

April 19, 2018

Primary Completion

August 24, 2021

Study Completion

August 24, 2021

Last Updated

December 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations