Center-based Physical Therapy and Home-based Physical Therapy After Platelet Rich Plasm Injection
Investigating of Difference Between Center-based Physical Therapy and Home-based Physical Therapy After Platelet Rich Plasm Injection in Women With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a chronic disease characterized by pain, reduced range of motion, instability and effusion in the joint. Moreover, no study has investigated the effect of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) in comparison with that of a placebo injection in the same patient with bilateral knee OA. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy and home exercises after PRP injection in patients with knee OA. The investigator hypothesized that the supervised physiotherapy program would be more effective in decreasing pain and improving muscle strength, physical function, and quality of life than home exercises following PRP injection in patients with knee OA. A total of 30 patients with complete follow-up to 6 weeks post-intervention; 17 patients randomized to the supervised exercise group and 13 patients randomized to the home exercise group. Subjects were recruited from who had radiographic evidence (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II-III) of knee OA and ranged from 45 to 70 years of age. Measurements including pain during rest and activity, muscle strength assessment, self-estimated functions of the affected knee and functional performance tests for lower extremity strength were performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2021
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
August 1, 2021
1 year
May 31, 2021
August 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visuel analogue scale
Visual Analog Scale was used to assess the subjects' pain during rest and activity. A 10 cm line was driven and subjects was wanted to mark the point (0; no pain, 10; worst imaginable pain) as representing the pain during rest and activity
6 weeks
Muscle Strenght
Quadriceps, hamstring muscles and the hip stability isometric test (HipSIT) strength were measured with a hand-held digital dynamometer. Each subject was verbally informed before the test in order to ensure correct movement and subjects were asked to perform submaximal contraction against the evaluator's hand before testing. ''Break test'' technique was performed for the strength measurement.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Physical Function
6 weeks
Knee Function
6 weeks
Weight
6 weeks
Height
6 weeks
Body mass index (BMI)
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Center-based Exercise
EXPERIMENTALpatients did exercises with a physical therapist in a clinic 3 days and 45 minute in a week for 6 weeks. The exercise programe included strenghtening and streching exercises. Strenghtening exercises for lower extremity and streching exercises for hamstrings.
Home-based exercise
EXPERIMENTALPatients did exercises at home every day and 3 times per day. The exercise programe included strenghtening and streching exercises. Strenghtening exercises for lower extremity and streching exercises for hamstrings.
Interventions
Exercise therapy with a physical therapist in a clinic.
Patients did exercises at home every day and 3 times per day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with knee osteoarthritis
- Patients with PRP injections
You may not qualify if:
- have any neurologic disease
- have any oncologic disease
- have any other intraarticular injection last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hacettepe University
Ankara, Samanpazari, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hande Güney Deniz, Assoc.,Prof
Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc, Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2021
First Posted
September 5, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share