Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Secondary Intention Wound Care Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial which is designed to determine whether aggressive and frequent debridement of an acute post-surgical wound shortens healing time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 23, 2021
March 1, 2021
7 months
February 12, 2019
March 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to healing
Time to complete healing as determined by one of the study investigators
0-16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient satisfaction with scar: Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ)
0-16 weeks. NOTE: The PSAQ will be completed by the patient once their wound is determined to be completely healed by the study investigators; usually between 6-8 weeks.
Cosmetic Appearance
0-16 weeks. NOTE: A photograph of the the patient's final healed wound will be evaluated by a blinded investigator after the wound is determined to be completely healed by the study investigators; usually between 6-8 weeks
Number of required debridements
0-16 weeks
Number of treatment failures
Through study completion, an average of 6-8 weeks
Complications
0-16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Aggressive Debridement
ACTIVE COMPARATORAggressive and frequent debridement of fibrin and crust from the wound base down to pinpoint bleeding, both by the patient as part of daily wound care at home, and also by the clinician (either physician or experienced dermatologic surgery nurse) during follow-up visits. Silver nitrate will be used to treat excessive granulation tissue only if the granulation tissue is higher than the level of surrounding skin. Patients will return weekly until healed. Patients will be provided with detailed instructions and guidelines to help determine whether healing has taken place.
Minimal Debridement
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo debridement of fibrin by the patient or the clinician. Exceptions include debridement of dried crust or eschar. Silver nitrate will be used to treat excessive granulation tissue only if the granulation tissue is higher than the level of surrounding skin. Patients will return every two weeks until healed. In between visits at weekly intervals, the patient will be contacted by phone to determine if healing has occurred in between clinic visits11. Patients will be provided with detailed instructions and guidelines to help determine whether healing has taken place.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dermatology patients at Lahey Clinic:
- who have undergone Mohs surgery or excision
- who are older than 18 years
- who are able to give consent
- who had postoperative defects allowed to heal by secondary intention on the a) head and neck, b) trunk and upper extremities, c) lower extremities
- who are willing and able to return to clinic in Peabody, MA, for all wound care visits
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to consent (due to language barrier or mental status)
- Unable to perform daily wound care
- Unwilling or unable to return for follow-up
- Have baseline venous stasis or pitting edema of the affected limb
- Wear compression stockings or require use of a compressive bandage (such as an Unna Boot) at baseline.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lahey Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Lahey Medical Center Peabody
Peabody, Massachusetts, 01960, United States
Related Publications (13)
Saap LJ, Falanga V. Debridement performance index and its correlation with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002 Nov-Dec;10(6):354-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10603.x.
PMID: 12453138BACKGROUNDSteed DL. Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5A):71S-74S. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00307-6.
PMID: 15147995BACKGROUNDHess CT, Kirsner RS. Orchestrating wound healing: assessing and preparing the wound bed. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):246-57; quiz 258-9. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200309000-00015.
PMID: 14581817BACKGROUNDFonder MA, Lazarus GS, Cowan DA, Aronson-Cook B, Kohli AR, Mamelak AJ. Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Feb;58(2):185-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.048.
PMID: 18222318BACKGROUNDAlavi A, Sibbald RG, Phillips TJ, Miller OF, Margolis DJ, Marston W, Woo K, Romanelli M, Kirsner RS. What's new: Management of venous leg ulcers: Treating venous leg ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Apr;74(4):643-64; quiz 665-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.059.
PMID: 26979355BACKGROUNDWilcox JR, Carter MJ, Covington S. Frequency of debridements and time to heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Sep;149(9):1050-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960.
PMID: 23884238BACKGROUNDLuft HS. Becoming accountable-opportunities and obstacles for ACOs. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1389-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1009380. No abstract available.
PMID: 20925539BACKGROUNDGloster HM Jr. The use of second-intention healing for partial-thickness Mohs defects involving the vermilion and/or mucosal surfaces of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Dec;47(6):893-7. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.125065.
PMID: 12451375BACKGROUNDGohari S, Gambla C, Healey M, Spaulding G, Gordon KB, Swan J, Cook B, West DP, Lapiere JC. Evaluation of tissue-engineered skin (human skin substitute) and secondary intention healing in the treatment of full thickness wounds after Mohs micrographic or excisional surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):1107-14; discussion 1114. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02130.x.
PMID: 12472488BACKGROUNDDodson MK, Magann EF, Meeks GR. A randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):321-4.
PMID: 1495686BACKGROUNDJoo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Omlin K, Kappel ST, Eisen DB. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.
PMID: 25372450BACKGROUNDDurani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 May;123(5):1481-1489. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205de.
PMID: 19407619BACKGROUNDFearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
PMID: 20596233BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey B Tiger, MD
Lahey Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded investigator will assess photographs of completely healed wounds
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2019
First Posted
March 19, 2019
Study Start
December 3, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data will become available once the final patient has finished the study and the data has been compiled and de-identified. It will be available until the paper is accepted for publication.
- Access Criteria
- Investigator will have access to the results as needed to author the paper.
Final results will be shared with another investigator who will not be participating in the clinical trial but will author the paper. All individual participant data will be de-identified before sharing with this investigator.