NCT03880331

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial which is designed to determine whether aggressive and frequent debridement of an acute post-surgical wound shortens healing time.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 3, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Secondary intentionWound care methods

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to healing

    Time to complete healing as determined by one of the study investigators

    0-16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Patient satisfaction with scar: Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ)

    0-16 weeks. NOTE: The PSAQ will be completed by the patient once their wound is determined to be completely healed by the study investigators; usually between 6-8 weeks.

  • Cosmetic Appearance

    0-16 weeks. NOTE: A photograph of the the patient's final healed wound will be evaluated by a blinded investigator after the wound is determined to be completely healed by the study investigators; usually between 6-8 weeks

  • Number of required debridements

    0-16 weeks

  • Number of treatment failures

    Through study completion, an average of 6-8 weeks

  • Complications

    0-16 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Aggressive Debridement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Aggressive and frequent debridement of fibrin and crust from the wound base down to pinpoint bleeding, both by the patient as part of daily wound care at home, and also by the clinician (either physician or experienced dermatologic surgery nurse) during follow-up visits. Silver nitrate will be used to treat excessive granulation tissue only if the granulation tissue is higher than the level of surrounding skin. Patients will return weekly until healed. Patients will be provided with detailed instructions and guidelines to help determine whether healing has taken place.

Procedure: Debridement

Minimal Debridement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

No debridement of fibrin by the patient or the clinician. Exceptions include debridement of dried crust or eschar. Silver nitrate will be used to treat excessive granulation tissue only if the granulation tissue is higher than the level of surrounding skin. Patients will return every two weeks until healed. In between visits at weekly intervals, the patient will be contacted by phone to determine if healing has occurred in between clinic visits11. Patients will be provided with detailed instructions and guidelines to help determine whether healing has taken place.

Procedure: Debridement

Interventions

DebridementPROCEDURE

Aggressive vs Minimal Debridement

Aggressive DebridementMinimal Debridement

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Dermatology patients at Lahey Clinic:
  • who have undergone Mohs surgery or excision
  • who are older than 18 years
  • who are able to give consent
  • who had postoperative defects allowed to heal by secondary intention on the a) head and neck, b) trunk and upper extremities, c) lower extremities
  • who are willing and able to return to clinic in Peabody, MA, for all wound care visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to consent (due to language barrier or mental status)
  • Unable to perform daily wound care
  • Unwilling or unable to return for follow-up
  • Have baseline venous stasis or pitting edema of the affected limb
  • Wear compression stockings or require use of a compressive bandage (such as an Unna Boot) at baseline.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lahey Medical Center Peabody

Peabody, Massachusetts, 01960, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Saap LJ, Falanga V. Debridement performance index and its correlation with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002 Nov-Dec;10(6):354-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10603.x.

    PMID: 12453138BACKGROUND
  • Steed DL. Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5A):71S-74S. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00307-6.

    PMID: 15147995BACKGROUND
  • Hess CT, Kirsner RS. Orchestrating wound healing: assessing and preparing the wound bed. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):246-57; quiz 258-9. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200309000-00015.

    PMID: 14581817BACKGROUND
  • Fonder MA, Lazarus GS, Cowan DA, Aronson-Cook B, Kohli AR, Mamelak AJ. Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Feb;58(2):185-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.048.

    PMID: 18222318BACKGROUND
  • Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Phillips TJ, Miller OF, Margolis DJ, Marston W, Woo K, Romanelli M, Kirsner RS. What's new: Management of venous leg ulcers: Treating venous leg ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Apr;74(4):643-64; quiz 665-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.059.

    PMID: 26979355BACKGROUND
  • Wilcox JR, Carter MJ, Covington S. Frequency of debridements and time to heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Sep;149(9):1050-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960.

    PMID: 23884238BACKGROUND
  • Luft HS. Becoming accountable-opportunities and obstacles for ACOs. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1389-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1009380. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20925539BACKGROUND
  • Gloster HM Jr. The use of second-intention healing for partial-thickness Mohs defects involving the vermilion and/or mucosal surfaces of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Dec;47(6):893-7. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.125065.

    PMID: 12451375BACKGROUND
  • Gohari S, Gambla C, Healey M, Spaulding G, Gordon KB, Swan J, Cook B, West DP, Lapiere JC. Evaluation of tissue-engineered skin (human skin substitute) and secondary intention healing in the treatment of full thickness wounds after Mohs micrographic or excisional surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):1107-14; discussion 1114. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02130.x.

    PMID: 12472488BACKGROUND
  • Dodson MK, Magann EF, Meeks GR. A randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):321-4.

    PMID: 1495686BACKGROUND
  • Joo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Omlin K, Kappel ST, Eisen DB. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.

    PMID: 25372450BACKGROUND
  • Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 May;123(5):1481-1489. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205de.

    PMID: 19407619BACKGROUND
  • Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.

    PMID: 20596233BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound

Interventions

Debridement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey B Tiger, MD

    Lahey Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinded investigator will assess photographs of completely healed wounds
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2019

First Posted

March 19, 2019

Study Start

December 3, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

March 1, 2021

Last Updated

March 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Final results will be shared with another investigator who will not be participating in the clinical trial but will author the paper. All individual participant data will be de-identified before sharing with this investigator.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
Data will become available once the final patient has finished the study and the data has been compiled and de-identified. It will be available until the paper is accepted for publication.
Access Criteria
Investigator will have access to the results as needed to author the paper.

Locations