Electroceutical Dressing Technology (EDT) Against Wound Microbial Biofilm Infection
EDT BioFilm
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
3
Brief Summary
There are currently limited treatments available that show anti-biofilm efficacy for wound infection management Biofilms account for over 80% of infections and approximately 65% of nosocomial infections caused by microorganisms in the developed world involve biofilms. There clearly is a need for cost effective, highly stable, easily obtained biofilm targeted strategies for treatment of chronic wound biofilm infections. The information generated from this project has the potential of providing considerable benefits to wound care by determining the efficacy of EDT dressing in managing wound biofilm infection and efficacy in wound healing and closure. Such knowledge could help therapeutic strategies and could provide information for future clinical studies to further understanding -of EDT wound dressings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 7, 2023
CompletedOctober 3, 2023
September 1, 2023
2.1 years
February 25, 2021
September 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response to the use of EDT treatment in prevention of wound biofilm infection
Impact of EDT treatment in prevention of incidence of wound biofilm infection
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
rate of wound closure 6 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline
6 weeks
wound microbiome in SoC and SoC+ EDT treatment.
3 weeks
Percent of patients with response to EDT treatment on week 6 as compared to SoC only group
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care Only
NO INTERVENTIONThis will be group 1
SOC and PED-10 +Procellera
EXPERIMENTALIn group 2, in addition to SoC, the patients will apply the EDThi dressing (PED-10) on the wound(s) for the first 3 weeks following enrollment followed by Procellera® or EDTlo for additional 3 weeks. The use of dressings will be discontinued anytime if complete wound closure is achieved.
Interventions
Use of EDThi for 3 weeks post enrollment
Use of EDTlo (Procellera®) for additional 3 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18 years and older
- subjects willing and able to provide informed consent
- patients with infected chronic trauma or surgical wounds
- wound(s) must be able to be covered by the EDT dressing
- All patients, with wounds below the knee, must have wound tissue oxygenation adequate to support wound healing per provider discretion, this may be defined by one or more of the following perfusion values within 6 months on enrollment: peri-wound transcutaneous oxygen measurements ≥ 25 mmHg (TCOM),Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) \>0.7, or a Toe pressure (TP) \> 40 mmHg, If none of these tests were performed during standard of care, then a trained study team member may obtain a TCOM measurement after the patient has consented and before they are enrolled. If there are multiple perfusion values that conflict, then a physician will review and determine if they are eligible for enrollment. If a patient has had a recent re-vascularization, the patient may be enrolled once adequate perfusion has been verified.
- Subjects must be able to read and understand English.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who are deemed unable to understand the procedures, risks and benefits of the study, ie. Informed consent will be excluded
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- Wound tissue not available for analysis
- Patient with known sensitivity or allergic reaction to zinc or silver
- Current active diagnosis of Osteomyelitis at the target wound site, that is untreated, based on clinical diagnosis per EMR.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Indiana Universitylead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- Naval Medical Research Centercollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Eskenazi Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46228, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sashwati Roy, PhD
Indiana University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- to avoid bias, the personnel performing the biofilm analysis (Primary outcome) will be blinded towards the study groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2021
First Posted
March 12, 2021
Study Start
June 3, 2021
Primary Completion
July 7, 2023
Study Completion
July 7, 2023
Last Updated
October 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share