NCT03338608

Brief Summary

The anterior cervical fusion and decompression (ACDF) surgery provides direct access to symptomatic areas of the cervical spine. Cosmesis, including factors like wound healing, is an important issue for patients who undergo surgery on anterior neck structures. One significant factor that impacts cosmetic healing in patients who undergo the ACDF surgery is whether a vertical or transverse incision of the platysma muscle in the neck was used to access the cervical spine. The purpose of the present study is to compare cosmetic outcomes in vertical versus transverse platysmal incisions for anterior cervical spine exposures. Researchers intend to analyze this effect with a prospective comparative study model. A targeted number of 100 patients who undergo anterior cervical surgery, as part of their standard of care, will be randomized to receive either a transverse or vertical platysmal incision during the exposure part of their procedure. Informed consent for inclusion in the study, as approved by the Institutional Review Board, will be obtained from all patients in addition to consent for the surgical procedure. Regardless of the platysmal incision, all patients will receive a standard transverse skin incision, as is done routinely in anterior cervical exposures. After the surgery, all closures will be done in a standard manner. These patients will be followed up in the clinic at two weeks, three months, six months, and one year. They will be evaluated for wound healing and incision cosmesis using a modification of The Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale. Clinical photographs of the patients' necks will be captured during these visits in a manner that does not reveal any patient identifiers in any way. The incisions and overall cosmesis will be graded using the scale mentioned above. The data will be analyzed to determine if a transverse platysmal incision offers better cosmetic results than a vertical platysmal incision, or vice versa, and will also be used to validate the modified wound evaluation scale.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 26, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

November 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

CosmesisWound HealingAnterior Cervical Decompression and FusionACDFPlatysma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Modified version of the Hollander wound evaluation scale

    Includes several factors of cosmetic wound healing (skin puckering, patient satisfaction, etc.). Based on photographic and patient follow-up information

    2 week follow up visit

  • Modified version of the Hollander wound evaluation scale

    Includes several factors of cosmetic wound healing (skin puckering, patient satisfaction, etc.). Based on photographic and patient follow-up information

    3 months follow up visit

  • Modified version of the Hollander wound evaluation scale

    Includes several factors of cosmetic wound healing (skin puckering, patient satisfaction, etc.). Based on photographic and patient follow-up information

    6 months follow up visit

  • Modified version of the Hollander wound evaluation scale

    Includes several factors of cosmetic wound healing (skin puckering, patient satisfaction, etc.). Based on photographic and patient follow-up information

    1 year follow up visit

Study Arms (2)

Vertical Platysma Incision

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this arm who have anterior cervical decompression and fusion will receive the vertical platysma incision.

Procedure: Anterior Cervical Decompression and FusionProcedure: Vertical Platysma Incision

Transverse Platysma Incision

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this arm who have anterior cervical decompression and fusion will receive the transverse platysma incision.

Procedure: Anterior Cervical Decompression and FusionProcedure: Transverse Platysma Incision

Interventions

Patients will receive the anterior cervical decompression and fusion as part of their standard of care. They will be randomized to either receive the vertical or transverse platysma incision.

Transverse Platysma IncisionVertical Platysma Incision

A vertical platysma Incision will be used for the anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgical procedure

Vertical Platysma Incision

A transverse platysma incision will be used for the anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgical procedure

Transverse Platysma Incision

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients undergoing elective Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion surgery for degenerative spinal pathologies by Dr. Tony Tannoury or Dr. Chadi Tannoury at Boston Medical Center as part of their standard of care.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing revision anterior cervical spine surgeries with a pre-existing scar. Patients with cervical spine tumors/neoplastic pathologies. Patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine trauma.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Denaro V, Di Martino A. Cervical spine surgery: an historical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):639-48. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1752-3.

    PMID: 21213087BACKGROUND
  • Fransen P. A simplified technique for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a screw-plate implanted over the Caspar distractor pins. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Aug;76(4):546-8.

    PMID: 20973364BACKGROUND
  • Fehlings MG, Arvin B. Surgical management of cervical degenerative disease: the evidence related to indications, impact, and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):97-100. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE09210.

    PMID: 19769487BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Gene Fusion

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Recombination, GeneticGenetic Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Chadi Tannoury, MD

    Boston Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: There are two groups. One group will have the vertical platysma incision and the other group will have the transverse incision.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2017

First Posted

November 9, 2017

Study Start

November 26, 2018

Primary Completion

September 15, 2019

Study Completion

September 15, 2019

Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations