Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine v.s Bupivacaine
Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will look into the incidence of Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) after the intrathecal use of lidocaine in comparison to intrathecal Bupivacaine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 5, 2019
March 1, 2019
1.1 years
February 19, 2019
March 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Transient Neurological Symptoms
To determine the incidence of TNS following the use of intrathecal Lidocaine as compared with Bupivacaine
Day 1
Transient Neurological Symptoms
To determine the incidence of TNS following the use of intrathecal Lidocaine as compared with Bupivacaine
Day 3
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Transient Neurological Symptoms
Day 1 and day 3 postoperative
Transient Neurological Symptoms
Day 1 and day 3 postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Intrathecal Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive spinal anesthesia in the sitting position under strict sterile conditions in the operating room. Using a median or paramedian approach, the spinal needle will be inserted into the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace to reach the subarachnoid space. After confirming the space by free flow of CSF, 60 mg of isobaric preservative-free Lidocaine 2% will be injected. Sedation using propofol infusion (50-100 mcg/kg/min) and fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg) will be given throughout the procedure as required.
Intrathecal Bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive spinal anesthesia in the sitting position under strict sterile conditions in the operating room. Using a median/paramedian approach, the spinal needle will be inserted into the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace to reach the subarachnoid space. After confirming the space by free flow of CSF, 6 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine will be injected. Sedation using propofol infusion (50-100 mcg/kg/min) and fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg) will be given throughout the procedure as required.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-III male and female patients aged between 18 to 80 years old, who will receive spinal anesthesia for surgeries lasting less than one hour.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 years old.
- ASA physical status \>3.
- Immunosuppression or high risk of infection.
- Contraindications to receiving spinal anesthesia (e.g. coagulation impairment).
- Patients with psychosis
- Patients with preexisting back pain.
- Patients with cognitive impairment
- Allergies to local anesthetics, analgesics or any medication used in the study.
- Patients with chronic regular opioid usage
- Presence of preexisting neurological symptoms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2019
First Posted
March 5, 2019
Study Start
November 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF