Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
Clinical Evaluation of a Moist Bonding Self-Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive System Versus Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Caries Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With limited evidence-based information in literature about using self-adhering flowable composite in conservative class V restorations, it was found beneficial to evaluate the newly introduced material using a randomized controlled clinical trial to test the null hypothesis that moist bonding self-adhering flowable composite with and without adhesive system will have the same clinical performance as conventional flowable composite in cervical caries lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 29, 2020
October 1, 2020
8 months
February 12, 2019
October 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the clinical performance using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of the direct restoration. (FDI) criteria includes
Biological properties (Postoperative hypersensitivity \& tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion \& abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth),Adjacent mucosa, Oral \& general health). Esthetic properties (Surface luster, Staining (surface \&margin),Color match \& translucency \& Esthetic anatomical form). Functional properties (Fracture or material retention, Marginal integrity, Occlusal contour \&wear (quantitatively \& qualitatively), Proximal anatomical form(contact point \&contour), Radiographic examination(when applicable) \&Patient's view For each criteria one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor). Subscales will not be combined
Change from the baseline at 6 months and12 months]
Study Arms (3)
flowable resin-composite
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3M flowable composite is a conventional restoration to treat anterior carious cervical lesions. considered to be the gold standard of the flowable composites. other names: ''flowable composite ''
self-adhering flowable
EXPERIMENTALintervention one is moist bonding self adhering flowable composite that binds to tooth without an adhesive system
self-adhering flowable with adhesive
EXPERIMENTALintervention two moist bonding self adhering flowable composite that binds to tooth with the aid of adhesive system to improve the clinical performance
Interventions
gold standard
moist bonding self adhering flowable composite
moist bonding self adhering flowable composite with the aid of an adhesive system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with anterior cervical carious lesions.
- Pulp asymptomatic vital carious anterior teeth.
- Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy.
- Disabilities.
- Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
- Deep extensive carious cavities that may lead to the fracture of the tooth or pulpal affection.
- Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
- Heavy smokers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Giza, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
June 20, 2020
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10